Skip to main content

The Latest Telephone Scam.


The latest telephone scam. 

I’m not sure what their profit was to be, or how they would use information, but here is what happened to me. 

A call came in on my cell phone.  The caller told me that someone (and gave a name) was trying to set up a separate account on my cell phone charges.  What I needed to do was give her the security code from T-Mobile to prevent this. Presto, the code was sent by text to my phone.  Do I give the code number to this voice?

Note, keep in mind the voice was muffled, and I had trouble hearing everything she said.  So, I said I would not send any info.  I asked for her name. It was Marie Homhs. When I asked for her phone number, the line went dead.  End of call. Conclusion? A scam - for sure.  Probably, I would be authorizing a new account, and this scammer would be making possible thousands of calls on my account. 

It pays to be circumspect about giving information. To anyone. For anything. Online or by phone.

-------------------
Obama Legacy?

I’m not sure if you’ll consider this good or bad, pro or con, but most insurance companies these days advertise you only have to pay for what you need.  (Recall, Obamacare was “one size fits all.”)  Alternatively, they advertise a plan that’s “right for you.” Mostly this is automobile insurance.

BTW, insurance companies are among the most prolific advertisers on television.  To the point of oboxiouness. Also, insurance companies have lots of money to advertise.

---------------------
Hong Kong

Written on a wall at a campus in Hong Kong, "Ideas are Bulletproof." Yet, there is a never ending stream of those who prefer using bullets.
----------------------------

Are you a Velveeta American?

Do you celebrate bulk cheese goo, or volume of salty taste, or artificial taste, or inexpensive cost?  If yes, you may be a Velveeta American.  Forget your cheddar afficiandos, your gooda good feelings, or your mozzarella manifestations. Break out the crackers, load them up with gobs of melted Velveeta and enjoy the game. 
Now for Velveeta politics?  Do you confuse taste with quality, or quality with bulk, or bulk with deliciousness?  Then you’re party is the Velveeticans.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...

The Lemming Instinct

  In certain vital domains, a pervasive mediocrity among practitioners can stifle genuine advancement. When the intellectual output of a field is predominantly average, it inevitably produces research of corresponding quality. Nevertheless, some of these ideas, by sheer chance or perhaps through effective dissemination, will inevitably gain traction. A significant number of scholars and researchers will gravitate towards these trends, contributing to and propagating further work along these established lines. Such a trajectory allows an initially flawed concept to ascend to the status of mainstream orthodoxy. However, over an extended period, these prevailing ideas invariably fail to withstand rigorous scrutiny; they are ultimately and conclusively disproven. The disheartening pattern then reveals itself: rather than genuine progress, an equally unvalidated or incorrect idea often supplants the discredited one, swiftly establishing its own dominance. This cycle perpetuates, ensurin...