Skip to main content

Fake Wine

It is the holiday season, and you wish to celebrate properly.  For your family, you want nothing but the best. For example, you think a bottle or two of Chateau Lafite Rothschild 1937, a so-so, medium  Bordeaux, would be suitable for the occasion.  Yet, at $2500 a bottle, you want to be sure you’re buying the real thing.  This is a serious testing problem.  After all you can’t open the bottle to peek inside. Nope, the bottle is sealed.  Then what? Ask an expert?  Until recently, that was all you could do.

But now, with many thanks to atomic physics, you can test what level of radioactivity from Cesium-137 is present.  This isotope of Cesium is manmade, not occurring in nature.  The first quantities were produced in 1952, and is now present in most wines produced after that time, owing to nuclear disasters such as the 2011 Fukushima nuclear power plant accident.  

So, if your Chateau Lafite ‘37 tests positive Cesium 137, you know it’s fake. 

I, for one, will never be so fooled ever again, since I bought a Cesium-137 detector for only $29,999 at Walmart.

Thank heaven for science.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...

The Lemming Instinct

  In certain vital domains, a pervasive mediocrity among practitioners can stifle genuine advancement. When the intellectual output of a field is predominantly average, it inevitably produces research of corresponding quality. Nevertheless, some of these ideas, by sheer chance or perhaps through effective dissemination, will inevitably gain traction. A significant number of scholars and researchers will gravitate towards these trends, contributing to and propagating further work along these established lines. Such a trajectory allows an initially flawed concept to ascend to the status of mainstream orthodoxy. However, over an extended period, these prevailing ideas invariably fail to withstand rigorous scrutiny; they are ultimately and conclusively disproven. The disheartening pattern then reveals itself: rather than genuine progress, an equally unvalidated or incorrect idea often supplants the discredited one, swiftly establishing its own dominance. This cycle perpetuates, ensurin...