Skip to main content

The Suicidal Middle East

One foreign policy problem the US faces comes from the concept, “Only we can fix it.”

We messed up Middle East stability by toppling Saddam Hussein, a tyrant of the first order. Yet he understood his turf.  The USA invasion opened the door to Iran. Enter Iran, not exactly a softball team.  Now we’re trying hard to close that door. And failing.

In another failing of the US is it always underestimates just how much pain, suffering, and starvation despots will accept on behalf of their people. Under current sanctions, every day Iranians are in dire straits.  Venezuelan citizens have access to even less without concern by their government. North Koreans endure impoverished lives for the glory of the controlling regime. Russians suffer calmly as only they can.

The latest Middle East attempt from the US is to unleash Turkey, whose boss, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, is brimming for big power. Trump has now given him the chance. So, Erdoğan, accustomed to only small-time opposition, goes to school. How many lives will be lost to his learn-on-the-job classes? Happiy, he already completed his first class, Brutality, online. Upcoming are classes in Treachery and Slaughter. A most popular elective is “Starving Your Enemy.”

 We wrestle with the morality of deserting the Kurds, but didn’t we leave the huge country of Iraq to its corrupt understructure? Indeed, corruption is the perma-structure of Iraq. Iran sees Yemen as a supported murderous nuisance to the South.  Hezbollah and Hamas are vassals of Iranian terror further North.  

Others in the US want us to dump Israel totally. More want to dump Saudi Arabia over a single (i.e. just one) death, journalist Jamal Khashoggi. Trivial! Tentative, big boom or big bust policies have condemned thousands of oppositional forces and their families to death in Syria.

The Middle East is not unlike an impossible maze from which there may be no exit. Turn this way or that, and there is yet another conflict.  Maybe Trump is aware and just wants out. Full stop! But to the contrary, there is an unlikely and uncommon bi-partisan agreement to disagree (with Trump).

The US always wants to take the moral high ground but stumbles badly in regions it does not understand.  Europe also takes the moral high ground by doing nothing. They argue of course that doing nothing is better than doing something. So we have nothing vs. something in this bizarre philosophical hierarchy.  China forgets morality altogether in the interests of business. Russia, mostly stupid in business, is still pretending it is the Soviet Union of old - just killing and moving in. Go Vlad.

In this part of the world, the overwhelming losers are the people. If only the oil would dry up,  then everybody would go home.

I hate to say it, but maybe there will be no resolution until someone sets off the big one. But who gets it?
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please Comment.

Popular posts from this blog

Accepting Fake Information

Every day, we are all bombarded with information, especially on news channels.  One group claims it's false; another calls it the truth. How can we know when to accept it or alternatively how can we know it's false? There are several factors which influence acceptance of fake or false information. Here are the big four.  Some just don’t have the knowledge to discern fact/truth from fiction/fact/false*. Some fake information is cleverly disguised and simply appears to be correct. Some fake information is accepted because the person wants to believe it. Some fake information is accepted because there is no other information to the contrary. However, the acceptance of  information  of any kind become a kind of  truth , and this is a well studied topic. In the link below is an essay on “The Truth About Truth.” This shows simply that what is your point of view, different types of information are generally accepted, fake or not.   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/g-donald-allen-420b03
Post a Comment
Read more

Your Brain Within Your Brain

  Your Bicameral Brain by Don Allen Have you ever gone to another room to get something, but when you got there you forgot what you were after? Have you ever experienced a flash of insight, but when you went to look it up online, you couldn’t even remember the keyword? You think you forgot it completely. How can it happen so fast? You worry your memory is failing. Are you merely absent-minded? You try to be amused. But maybe you didn’t forget.   Just maybe that flash of insight, clear and present for an instant, was never given in the verbal form, but another type of intelligence you possess, that you use, and that communicates only to you. We are trained to live in a verbal world, where words matter most. Aside from emotions, we are unable to conjure up other, nonverbal, forms of intelligence we primitively, pre-verbally, possess but don’t know how to use. Alas, we live in a world of words, stewing in the alphabet, sleeping under pages of paragraphs, almost ignoring one of
Post a Comment
Read more

Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious?

  Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious? I truly like the study of consciousness, though it is safe to say no one really knows what it is. Some philosophers has avoided the problem by claiming consciousness simply doesn’t exist. It's the ultimate escape clause. However, the "therefore, it does not exist" argument also applies to "truth", "God", and even "reality" all quite beyond a consensus description for at least three millennia. For each issue or problem defying description or understanding, simply escape the problem by claiming it doesn’t exist. Problem solved or problem avoided? Alternately, as Daniel Dennett explains consciousness as an account of the various calculations occurring in the brain at close to the same time. However, he goes on to say that consciousness is so insignificant, especially compared to our exalted notions of it, that it might as well not exist [1] . Oh, well. Getting back to consciousness, most of us have view
Post a Comment
Read more