Skip to main content

The Suicidal Middle East

One foreign policy problem the US faces comes from the concept, “Only we can fix it.”

We messed up Middle East stability by toppling Saddam Hussein, a tyrant of the first order. Yet he understood his turf.  The USA invasion opened the door to Iran. Enter Iran, not exactly a softball team.  Now we’re trying hard to close that door. And failing.

In another failing of the US is it always underestimates just how much pain, suffering, and starvation despots will accept on behalf of their people. Under current sanctions, every day Iranians are in dire straits.  Venezuelan citizens have access to even less without concern by their government. North Koreans endure impoverished lives for the glory of the controlling regime. Russians suffer calmly as only they can.

The latest Middle East attempt from the US is to unleash Turkey, whose boss, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, is brimming for big power. Trump has now given him the chance. So, Erdoğan, accustomed to only small-time opposition, goes to school. How many lives will be lost to his learn-on-the-job classes? Happiy, he already completed his first class, Brutality, online. Upcoming are classes in Treachery and Slaughter. A most popular elective is “Starving Your Enemy.”

 We wrestle with the morality of deserting the Kurds, but didn’t we leave the huge country of Iraq to its corrupt understructure? Indeed, corruption is the perma-structure of Iraq. Iran sees Yemen as a supported murderous nuisance to the South.  Hezbollah and Hamas are vassals of Iranian terror further North.  

Others in the US want us to dump Israel totally. More want to dump Saudi Arabia over a single (i.e. just one) death, journalist Jamal Khashoggi. Trivial! Tentative, big boom or big bust policies have condemned thousands of oppositional forces and their families to death in Syria.

The Middle East is not unlike an impossible maze from which there may be no exit. Turn this way or that, and there is yet another conflict.  Maybe Trump is aware and just wants out. Full stop! But to the contrary, there is an unlikely and uncommon bi-partisan agreement to disagree (with Trump).

The US always wants to take the moral high ground but stumbles badly in regions it does not understand.  Europe also takes the moral high ground by doing nothing. They argue of course that doing nothing is better than doing something. So we have nothing vs. something in this bizarre philosophical hierarchy.  China forgets morality altogether in the interests of business. Russia, mostly stupid in business, is still pretending it is the Soviet Union of old - just killing and moving in. Go Vlad.

In this part of the world, the overwhelming losers are the people. If only the oil would dry up,  then everybody would go home.

I hate to say it, but maybe there will be no resolution until someone sets off the big one. But who gets it?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

Where is AI (Artificial Intelligence) Going?

  How to view Artificial Intelligence (AI).  Imagine you go to the store to buy a TV, but all they have are 1950s models, black and white, circular screens, picture rolls, and picture imperfect, no remote. You’d say no thanks. Back in the day, they sold wildly. The TV was a must-have for everyone with $250 to spend* (about $3000 today). Compared to where AI is today, this is more or less where TVs were 70 years ago. In only a few decades AI will be advanced beyond comprehension, just like TVs today are from the 50s viewpoint. Just like we could not imagine where the video concept was going back then, we cannot really imagine where AI is going. Buckle up. But it will be spectacular.    *Back then minimum wage was $0.75/hr. Thus, a TV cost more than eight weeks' wages. ------------------------- 

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...