Skip to main content

I See You


Today, we are discussing all those cameras being placed all over our cities.  Officials tell us it's for our protection.  Citizens are worried. Movements are afoot to reduce this camera presence.  Is it justified?  Remember, its not just the picture, it what comes with it.
Pictures plus a thousand words?  Artificial Intelligence (AI) can put together your picture with all your personal data. Subversives should be nervous.  So should we all. Dossiers for all.
In the West we need to trust our government to restrain its natural instincts to use any information they have to stay in power.  The comes to ethics, and ethics is rapidly becoming a theoretical subject, a historical artifact, a quaint quality. Deprecated at last review.   
I don’t care what your politics.  Can you say with certainty your party would not use this information to track political opponents in looking for damaging information?  Like the old song, “Simply Irresistible.”
Want more?  Enter the hacker.  Government data systems are notoriously vulnerable.  This implies third parties can track anyone they want with full dossier.  Bottom line?  Except for the canonical nobody, there is somebody who wants to know what you’re doing – and now can.
Want still more?  China has this entire package in place.  Citizens get an annual score – with dire consequences for a low score. Even the bigshots get scanned, and do they know who’s looking in?  Big country, many eyes.
Cameras are good: terrorist deterent.  Cameras are bad: government surveillance. Can it be both?  Can both be good?

Plus-Plus-Plus-Plus-Plus-Plus-Plus-Plus-Plus-Plus-Plus-Plus-Plus-Plus-Plus-Plus
The greatest learning engine is problem solving.  Give a lecture and only a fraction learn. Ask for a group discussion and more learn.  Ask them to solve a problem, and they all learn.

Why is a diamond ring like ethics?  If you’re speeding along on a highway in your car and you toss out a diamond ring, you will probably never find it again.  It’s the same with ethics.  Throw them out while speeding through life, and they’re likely never to be found again. 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please Comment.

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...
Post a Comment
Read more

UNCERTAINTY IS CERTAIN

  Uncertainty is Certain G. Donald Allen 12/12/2024 1.       Introduction . This short essay is about uncertainty in people from both secular and nonsecular viewpoints. One point that will emerge is that randomly based uncertainty can be a driver for religious structure. Many groups facing uncertainty about their future are deeply religious or rely on faith as a source of comfort, resilience, and guidance. The intersection of uncertainty and religiosity often stems from the human need to find meaning, hope, and stability in the face of unpredictable or challenging circumstances. We first take up the connections of uncertainty to religion for the first real profession, farming, noting that hunting has many similar uncertainties. Below are groups that commonly lean on religious beliefs amidst uncertainty.   This short essay is a follow-up to a previous piece on certainty (https://used-ideas.blogspot.com/2024/12/certainty-is-also-emotion.html). U...
Post a Comment
Read more

Robin Hood and Cliven Bundy

  Actor Herbert Mundin, playing Munch in the 1938 film The Adventures of Robin Hood (starring Errol Flynn) is charged by Prince John's troops of slaying a royal deer in the royal Sherwood forest.  The punishment is death.  Though the events of this film are a portrayal of events dating to the 15th century, they became by the 19th century a "robbing from the rich for the poor" theme so often depicted in other film genres. The William Tell legend is another. The plot is simple.  A poor man desperate to survive tastes the forbidden fruits owned by the authority, and is condemned. I would love to hear this event debated on the current TV news shows.  On the one hand, Munch would be a champion in service to his family.  On the other hand, his legal rights are restricted by legal authority. so, the argument would proceed.  Legal scholars cite statutes chapter and verse, while others would root for the common man.  Fast forward to 2014. Parallels ...
Post a Comment
Read more