Skip to main content

Climate Risk?

I'm not talking about climate change or global warming here.  Our discussion is about climate risk.  Just a couple of decades past, all the buzz was about global cooling. Now it is about warming.  

Unhappily politicians have become involved.  You must ask yourself, and answer honestly.  If I support party A and they claim this, do I believe them?  Or if I support party B, and they believe the opposite, do I believe that?  Short answer.  Believe neither. 


Any politician supporting or denying "climate risk" is being political, not scientific.  NOBODY understands it.  If you really want to know, here's a very short list what to do and know.

  • Remove most of the $$$.
  • Establish theories of reflectivity of solar energy by atmospheric particle suspension, particulate and aerosol (micro and nano).
  • Understand the nature of oceanic currents, historic and current.
  • Establish consistent locations and equipment for thermal measurements.
  • Understand the effects of atmospheric conditions.
  • Accurately measure the cyclicity of historic temperature variations and glaciation.
  • Stop the claims: a. Yesterday's horrible hurricane is climate change proved. b. Last year's cold winter was predicted by the models.  If your model predicts everything that will happen, you're as scientific as an astrologer.
  • And then come the anthropomorphic issues - where all the power resides.  Sketchy and belief based only are these.  It comes to pseudo-statistics implying causality.  
  • Know this: if politicians are involved, there is inherent corruption.

It is just plain impossible to be expert at all of the scientific areas of the above list. To understand climate well enough to make predictions is currently beyond the scope of (honest) science. Scientists are trying, but they are tainted by politics and $$$.

If you don't really understand, don't confuse what you want to believe and what is true.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

UNCERTAINTY IS CERTAIN

  Uncertainty is Certain G. Donald Allen 12/12/2024 1.       Introduction . This short essay is about uncertainty in people from both secular and nonsecular viewpoints. One point that will emerge is that randomly based uncertainty can be a driver for religious structure. Many groups facing uncertainty about their future are deeply religious or rely on faith as a source of comfort, resilience, and guidance. The intersection of uncertainty and religiosity often stems from the human need to find meaning, hope, and stability in the face of unpredictable or challenging circumstances. We first take up the connections of uncertainty to religion for the first real profession, farming, noting that hunting has many similar uncertainties. Below are groups that commonly lean on religious beliefs amidst uncertainty.   This short essay is a follow-up to a previous piece on certainty (https://used-ideas.blogspot.com/2024/12/certainty-is-also-emotion.html). U...

CERTAINTY IS ALSO AN EMOTION

  Certainty is also a Feeling Certainty is often viewed as a mental state tied to knowledge and confidence, but it also functions as a feeling with distinct emotional and physiological components. While it arises from cognitive processes, certainty also has a subjective and emotional quality that makes it more than just a rational judgment. It provides a sense of assurance and security that shapes human experience in profound ways. Emotional Dimension . At its core, certainty evokes emotions that influence how we perceive and interact with the world. When someone feels certain, they often experience relief, comfort, or empowerment. These emotions are particularly strong when uncertainty or doubt is resolved, offering a sense of closure. For example, solving a complex problem or having a belief validated by evidence brings not just intellectual satisfaction but also emotional reassurance. Subjectivity. Certainty is inherently personal and subjective. It depends on individual...

Lies, Deceit, and the National Agenda

The world you grew up in is no more.  The world of reasonable honesty and reasonable lies has been replaced by abject dishonesty and blatant lies. Lies.  Yes. People have always told them.  You have told them; so have I.   We need lies; they are a foundational structure of social living.  They both deceive and protect.  Children tell them to their parents to avoid consequences, like punishment.  Adults tell them to their bosses, to enhance their position and/or avoid consequences of poor performance.  Our bosses tell them to their boards to suggest business is good, the project is on target, or the detractors are wrong.  The boards tell them to shareholders to protect their own credibility and most importantly, stock values.   Our politicians tell lies to their constituents, though sometimes innocently with them not actually knowing much more than they've been told.  They enhance their positio...