Skip to main content

The Modern Do-Gooder


On this earth, there are many who do good, doctors, nurses, teachers, ministers, and countless other warm-hearted people. Their helping sustains nations, making life livable, making life a joy while taking joy in selflessness, making honesty a constant virtue. 
Another class of citizens are the do-gooders, mostly with their goal to do good for themselves by doing something for others.  They gossip, cheat, preach, rumor, condemn, include, exclude, and depress all for their good.
For do-gooders, the “for me” dominates the “for you.”
These do-gooders are here forever.  Diving a little deeper…
If your goal is to do good, and you have no basis for what good is, you may execute simplistic acts for which there is little reason and particularly pragmatism.  You could be seduced by a facet or two of a logical, social, or political complex of great depth. 
Only when the need to do good is tempered on the anvil of contemplation can the result have lasting consequence and to be good.  Important to note is: Not all good has a material nature. Not all good comes from restructuring. Not all good comes from the destruction of history.  
Consider a short list of Mindless Goodness, where the appearance of “doing good” is likely in error. You know you are a  modern day do-gooder if you believe in…
  • Spreading money randomly
  • Lavish distributions without validated merit.
  • Deciding what should be learned and what should not.
  • Changing lives of others in accordance with yours.
  • Changing a culture substantially because you think it’s wrong.

The greatest danger from do-gooders is their promoting personally preferred ideas disguised as ultimate good.
The conqueror merely wants to occupy your lands. The do-gooder wants to conquer your life, even those of the troglodyte.
-------------------------
Be wary of modern do-gooders who insist there is free will, but equally insist on taking it from you.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Accepting Fake Information

Every day, we are all bombarded with information, especially on news channels.  One group claims it's false; another calls it the truth. How can we know when to accept it or alternatively how can we know it's false? There are several factors which influence acceptance of fake or false information. Here are the big four.  Some just don’t have the knowledge to discern fact/truth from fiction/fact/false*. Some fake information is cleverly disguised and simply appears to be correct. Some fake information is accepted because the person wants to believe it. Some fake information is accepted because there is no other information to the contrary. However, the acceptance of  information  of any kind become a kind of  truth , and this is a well studied topic. In the link below is an essay on “The Truth About Truth.” This shows simply that what is your point of view, different types of information are generally accepted, fake or not.   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/g-donald-allen-420b03

Your Brain Within Your Brain

  Your Bicameral Brain by Don Allen Have you ever gone to another room to get something, but when you got there you forgot what you were after? Have you ever experienced a flash of insight, but when you went to look it up online, you couldn’t even remember the keyword? You think you forgot it completely. How can it happen so fast? You worry your memory is failing. Are you merely absent-minded? You try to be amused. But maybe you didn’t forget.   Just maybe that flash of insight, clear and present for an instant, was never given in the verbal form, but another type of intelligence you possess, that you use, and that communicates only to you. We are trained to live in a verbal world, where words matter most. Aside from emotions, we are unable to conjure up other, nonverbal, forms of intelligence we primitively, pre-verbally, possess but don’t know how to use. Alas, we live in a world of words, stewing in the alphabet, sleeping under pages of paragraphs, almost ignoring one of

Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious?

  Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious? I truly like the study of consciousness, though it is safe to say no one really knows what it is. Some philosophers has avoided the problem by claiming consciousness simply doesn’t exist. It's the ultimate escape clause. However, the "therefore, it does not exist" argument also applies to "truth", "God", and even "reality" all quite beyond a consensus description for at least three millennia. For each issue or problem defying description or understanding, simply escape the problem by claiming it doesn’t exist. Problem solved or problem avoided? Alternately, as Daniel Dennett explains consciousness as an account of the various calculations occurring in the brain at close to the same time. However, he goes on to say that consciousness is so insignificant, especially compared to our exalted notions of it, that it might as well not exist [1] . Oh, well. Getting back to consciousness, most of us have view