Skip to main content

Shadows of Time


Time is a really big four-letter word.  We talk about it, write about it, measure it, but really no one quite knows what it is.  Consider by analogy the fish living in water.  Does it know or recognize the water.  For the fish, water is almost unrecognized and surely unknown. Like time is for us.

It is not known whether time has a direction.  This means we don’t know if time is reversible.  Most think time does have the proverbial arrow – no reversal.  Physicists are especially interested in time, and what it means. Railroads live by it.  Airlines mostly ignore it. Doctors never heard of it.

Sometimes what a thing means is reflected in how we use it or modify it, as with an adjective. For time, there is a long list of at least fifty modifiers.  Here are some of them. They betray both our confusion and our understanding of time.  Look at all our needs for this basic quantity/concept in our lives.
ample
 first
 long
 olden
 short
 appointed
 full
 longer
 part
 shorter
 considerable
 future
 longest
 past
 shortest
 difficult
 hard
 lose
 precious
 spare
 down
 hold
 lost
 present
 spend
 due
 idle
 make
 proper
 sufficient
 elapsed
 last
 mean
 reasonable
 third
 enough
 later
 more
 regulate
 tough
 equal
 lead
 much
 same
 valuable
 extra
 less
 next
 second
 waste

Don’t forget “schedule” and “wrong.” There are more...

Now to measure time, we need a lot of descriptors, from nanoseconds to millennia, eons, and epochs. Did you know that scientists don’t know what happens to time when the length you measure is less than 10^(-42) seconds. That would be a micro-micro-micro-micro-micro-micro-micro second.  So, time may be quantum in its nature. No one knows.

In sum, we haven’t defined time per se, we’ve merely looked at its shadows on the wall. Don’t you think it’s “high” time to “take” time to “spend” time to learn more “about” time?

After all, you live in it, or do you swim in it?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Human Simulation is Possible - by Humans

  Human Simulation: Agent-Based Modeling and the Computational Case for Our Reality   1.       Introduction In the essay, we introduce the notion that humanity could be a deliberate simulation based on an extremely simple single-celled organism, hardly anything more complex than that. This will allow an (apparently) new interpretation of the notion that humanity is simulated, but that there is no master engineer at a massive number of dials and switches, responsible for every twist and turn of our universe and lives. We begin with the notion that the universe exists and operates under its own laws. So, given the Earth [2] , when and where life first began, it was infused with a living agent, self-actualized, reproductive, and with other basic rules for its operations, interactions, and much of what single-celled organisms do today. The idea from this occurred some years back when writing code in ActionScript (formerly Flash), I was able to create...

The Calculus of Ideas and Patterns

  Introduction. When dealing with ideas, patterns, intuition, and brainstorming, we need operations or rules not unlike those of arithmetic. The goal is not proof, a finished device, or a fait accompli , but rather a foundation for further investigation and study. In some cases, these operations may yield a proposition, that is, something capable of being proved. In this sense, they form a practical logic of intuition. The article concludes with a few select examples from a variety of venues. Setting. We are working with a given idea, problem, or project, or simply just thinking. Our aim is to discover pathways, patterns, or conceptual connections that may be useful. The following operations describe ways in which ideas and patterns can be generated, transformed, or refined. These also work toward understanding the imagination. Yet, this framework is distinguished from formal logic and proof. We are tempted to call them as “soft logic” because while nothing is proved, reasons...

Freedom of Speech

  Think of freedom of speech as a living organism. Then think of what is required for it to survive. Coming to mind are a population agreeable to its constitution (its environment) and the institutions (its nutrients) that keep it healthy. Currently, many institutions, including some political parties, question unfettered freedom of speech and are working to deny it, claiming it is unhealthy for the body politic. Yes? No?