Skip to main content

Shadows of Time


Time is a really big four-letter word.  We talk about it, write about it, measure it, but really no one quite knows what it is.  Consider by analogy the fish living in water.  Does it know or recognize the water.  For the fish, water is almost unrecognized and surely unknown. Like time is for us.

It is not known whether time has a direction.  This means we don’t know if time is reversible.  Most think time does have the proverbial arrow – no reversal.  Physicists are especially interested in time, and what it means. Railroads live by it.  Airlines mostly ignore it. Doctors never heard of it.

Sometimes what a thing means is reflected in how we use it or modify it, as with an adjective. For time, there is a long list of at least fifty modifiers.  Here are some of them. They betray both our confusion and our understanding of time.  Look at all our needs for this basic quantity/concept in our lives.
ample
 first
 long
 olden
 short
 appointed
 full
 longer
 part
 shorter
 considerable
 future
 longest
 past
 shortest
 difficult
 hard
 lose
 precious
 spare
 down
 hold
 lost
 present
 spend
 due
 idle
 make
 proper
 sufficient
 elapsed
 last
 mean
 reasonable
 third
 enough
 later
 more
 regulate
 tough
 equal
 lead
 much
 same
 valuable
 extra
 less
 next
 second
 waste

Don’t forget “schedule” and “wrong.” There are more...

Now to measure time, we need a lot of descriptors, from nanoseconds to millennia, eons, and epochs. Did you know that scientists don’t know what happens to time when the length you measure is less than 10^(-42) seconds. That would be a micro-micro-micro-micro-micro-micro-micro second.  So, time may be quantum in its nature. No one knows.

In sum, we haven’t defined time per se, we’ve merely looked at its shadows on the wall. Don’t you think it’s “high” time to “take” time to “spend” time to learn more “about” time?

After all, you live in it, or do you swim in it?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Accepting Fake Information

Every day, we are all bombarded with information, especially on news channels.  One group claims it's false; another calls it the truth. How can we know when to accept it or alternatively how can we know it's false? There are several factors which influence acceptance of fake or false information. Here are the big four.  Some just don’t have the knowledge to discern fact/truth from fiction/fact/false*. Some fake information is cleverly disguised and simply appears to be correct. Some fake information is accepted because the person wants to believe it. Some fake information is accepted because there is no other information to the contrary. However, the acceptance of  information  of any kind become a kind of  truth , and this is a well studied topic. In the link below is an essay on “The Truth About Truth.” This shows simply that what is your point of view, different types of information are generally accepted, fake or not.   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/g-donald-allen-420b03

Your Brain Within Your Brain

  Your Bicameral Brain by Don Allen Have you ever gone to another room to get something, but when you got there you forgot what you were after? Have you ever experienced a flash of insight, but when you went to look it up online, you couldn’t even remember the keyword? You think you forgot it completely. How can it happen so fast? You worry your memory is failing. Are you merely absent-minded? You try to be amused. But maybe you didn’t forget.   Just maybe that flash of insight, clear and present for an instant, was never given in the verbal form, but another type of intelligence you possess, that you use, and that communicates only to you. We are trained to live in a verbal world, where words matter most. Aside from emotions, we are unable to conjure up other, nonverbal, forms of intelligence we primitively, pre-verbally, possess but don’t know how to use. Alas, we live in a world of words, stewing in the alphabet, sleeping under pages of paragraphs, almost ignoring one of

Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious?

  Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious? I truly like the study of consciousness, though it is safe to say no one really knows what it is. Some philosophers has avoided the problem by claiming consciousness simply doesn’t exist. It's the ultimate escape clause. However, the "therefore, it does not exist" argument also applies to "truth", "God", and even "reality" all quite beyond a consensus description for at least three millennia. For each issue or problem defying description or understanding, simply escape the problem by claiming it doesn’t exist. Problem solved or problem avoided? Alternately, as Daniel Dennett explains consciousness as an account of the various calculations occurring in the brain at close to the same time. However, he goes on to say that consciousness is so insignificant, especially compared to our exalted notions of it, that it might as well not exist [1] . Oh, well. Getting back to consciousness, most of us have view