Skip to main content

Lost Forever


If you consider all the knowledge, abilities, skills, and memories people possess, you note enormous knowledge resources contained by society, but maintained by individual agents.  However, when one of these agents passes, this information is abruptly lost forever. Not reclaimable, redeemable, or reconstructible, it is just gone. 

For example, the unrecorded thoughts of Socrates, Kant, and others are gone forever. Sir Isaac Newton, on the other hand, wrote thousands of words on his ideas in multiple notebooks (many bizarre).

Every day, individual deaths carry vast amounts of lost knowledge, factual, operational, skills, and data.  Over all time, you have wealth and knowledge, but you can’t take either along.  You can leave behind wealth but not your knowledge.  Your mind, with its lifetime of accumulations, is often the more valuable. What you know uniquely is lost and must be rediscovered.

So very much of my parents has been lost forever.

Such is the tragic loss to humanity, every day of every year. Yet it’s never much recognized because it has always been. To preserve wealth, we set up trusts, wills, bequeaths, etc. For knowledge, the best we can all do is to communicate with the living while we are living. Family events, writing, speeches, just conversation are a few pathways.  Showing, tutoring, and teaching are others. Loving, caring, and friendships are more still.  Yet, so much is lost, promised for a future day.

What else can we do? Plenty.  There is the trusty diary to record your random memories. You can make a blog to record all your thoughts*. There are now oral history apps you can use with your cell phone.  You could create a private channel on Youtube.com and make notes there.  With this option you can also make picture shows and upload them.

Incidentally, this knowledge loss must affect the entropy of all knowledge.  This has not been discussed in the literature, though the entropy of knowledge has.

*This blog was begun in 2012.

-----------------
For me... The best adjective descriptor of Russian President Vladimir Putin is “reptilian.”  Perfect.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please Comment.

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...
Post a Comment
Read more

UNCERTAINTY IS CERTAIN

  Uncertainty is Certain G. Donald Allen 12/12/2024 1.       Introduction . This short essay is about uncertainty in people from both secular and nonsecular viewpoints. One point that will emerge is that randomly based uncertainty can be a driver for religious structure. Many groups facing uncertainty about their future are deeply religious or rely on faith as a source of comfort, resilience, and guidance. The intersection of uncertainty and religiosity often stems from the human need to find meaning, hope, and stability in the face of unpredictable or challenging circumstances. We first take up the connections of uncertainty to religion for the first real profession, farming, noting that hunting has many similar uncertainties. Below are groups that commonly lean on religious beliefs amidst uncertainty.   This short essay is a follow-up to a previous piece on certainty (https://used-ideas.blogspot.com/2024/12/certainty-is-also-emotion.html). U...
Post a Comment
Read more

Robin Hood and Cliven Bundy

  Actor Herbert Mundin, playing Munch in the 1938 film The Adventures of Robin Hood (starring Errol Flynn) is charged by Prince John's troops of slaying a royal deer in the royal Sherwood forest.  The punishment is death.  Though the events of this film are a portrayal of events dating to the 15th century, they became by the 19th century a "robbing from the rich for the poor" theme so often depicted in other film genres. The William Tell legend is another. The plot is simple.  A poor man desperate to survive tastes the forbidden fruits owned by the authority, and is condemned. I would love to hear this event debated on the current TV news shows.  On the one hand, Munch would be a champion in service to his family.  On the other hand, his legal rights are restricted by legal authority. so, the argument would proceed.  Legal scholars cite statutes chapter and verse, while others would root for the common man.  Fast forward to 2014. Parallels ...
Post a Comment
Read more