Skip to main content

Lost Forever


If you consider all the knowledge, abilities, skills, and memories people possess, you note enormous knowledge resources contained by society, but maintained by individual agents.  However, when one of these agents passes, this information is abruptly lost forever. Not reclaimable, redeemable, or reconstructible, it is just gone. 

For example, the unrecorded thoughts of Socrates, Kant, and others are gone forever. Sir Isaac Newton, on the other hand, wrote thousands of words on his ideas in multiple notebooks (many bizarre).

Every day, individual deaths carry vast amounts of lost knowledge, factual, operational, skills, and data.  Over all time, you have wealth and knowledge, but you can’t take either along.  You can leave behind wealth but not your knowledge.  Your mind, with its lifetime of accumulations, is often the more valuable. What you know uniquely is lost and must be rediscovered.

So very much of my parents has been lost forever.

Such is the tragic loss to humanity, every day of every year. Yet it’s never much recognized because it has always been. To preserve wealth, we set up trusts, wills, bequeaths, etc. For knowledge, the best we can all do is to communicate with the living while we are living. Family events, writing, speeches, just conversation are a few pathways.  Showing, tutoring, and teaching are others. Loving, caring, and friendships are more still.  Yet, so much is lost, promised for a future day.

What else can we do? Plenty.  There is the trusty diary to record your random memories. You can make a blog to record all your thoughts*. There are now oral history apps you can use with your cell phone.  You could create a private channel on Youtube.com and make notes there.  With this option you can also make picture shows and upload them.

Incidentally, this knowledge loss must affect the entropy of all knowledge.  This has not been discussed in the literature, though the entropy of knowledge has.

*This blog was begun in 2012.

-----------------
For me... The best adjective descriptor of Russian President Vladimir Putin is “reptilian.”  Perfect.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Accepting Fake Information

Every day, we are all bombarded with information, especially on news channels.  One group claims it's false; another calls it the truth. How can we know when to accept it or alternatively how can we know it's false? There are several factors which influence acceptance of fake or false information. Here are the big four.  Some just don’t have the knowledge to discern fact/truth from fiction/fact/false*. Some fake information is cleverly disguised and simply appears to be correct. Some fake information is accepted because the person wants to believe it. Some fake information is accepted because there is no other information to the contrary. However, the acceptance of  information  of any kind become a kind of  truth , and this is a well studied topic. In the link below is an essay on “The Truth About Truth.” This shows simply that what is your point of view, different types of information are generally accepted, fake or not.   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/g-donald-allen-420b03

Your Brain Within Your Brain

  Your Bicameral Brain by Don Allen Have you ever gone to another room to get something, but when you got there you forgot what you were after? Have you ever experienced a flash of insight, but when you went to look it up online, you couldn’t even remember the keyword? You think you forgot it completely. How can it happen so fast? You worry your memory is failing. Are you merely absent-minded? You try to be amused. But maybe you didn’t forget.   Just maybe that flash of insight, clear and present for an instant, was never given in the verbal form, but another type of intelligence you possess, that you use, and that communicates only to you. We are trained to live in a verbal world, where words matter most. Aside from emotions, we are unable to conjure up other, nonverbal, forms of intelligence we primitively, pre-verbally, possess but don’t know how to use. Alas, we live in a world of words, stewing in the alphabet, sleeping under pages of paragraphs, almost ignoring one of

Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious?

  Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious? I truly like the study of consciousness, though it is safe to say no one really knows what it is. Some philosophers has avoided the problem by claiming consciousness simply doesn’t exist. It's the ultimate escape clause. However, the "therefore, it does not exist" argument also applies to "truth", "God", and even "reality" all quite beyond a consensus description for at least three millennia. For each issue or problem defying description or understanding, simply escape the problem by claiming it doesn’t exist. Problem solved or problem avoided? Alternately, as Daniel Dennett explains consciousness as an account of the various calculations occurring in the brain at close to the same time. However, he goes on to say that consciousness is so insignificant, especially compared to our exalted notions of it, that it might as well not exist [1] . Oh, well. Getting back to consciousness, most of us have view