Skip to main content

Investing by Television


In retirement, I watch a lot of business shows.  Here the news is mostly factual, not given to political rhetoric - thankfully.  Most of the shows’ hosts bring in financial leaders to forecast, to project, to explain investment strategies, and otherwise discuss Wall Street comings and goings.  The comments vary, from bull to bear, and from optimistic to pessimistic, from data to anecdote

Almost without variation most financial strategists follow first order cause-effect policies.  The market does this, we do that.  Seldom do you see a strategist with an overall command of fiscal conditions.  Their methods are simple and ad hoc. Sometimes, it seems like there is a predictions club where all read what the others write.  This could be a CYA symptom, as they have high paying jobs and must at all times justify their salaries are well deserved.   Some filter their comments through their politics, but either way, it’s useless.

From time to time, they offer stock picks.  Listening and acting upon their advice is risky.  For example, Halliburton was recommended.  Sources indicated it to be a “buy.” I bought.  Down it has come.  In another, the stock Rewalk Robotics was recommended.  It was cheap.  I bought.  Down it went, but just lately it went to the sky, making me some money. 

Some know their stuff and just how complicated the investment business is.  You can just tell.  Often, because of this complexity, their remarks are difficult to follow.  Blackstone CEO Stephen A. Schwarzman is typical.  His message is complex and encompassing, but well worth distillation efforts. Fox host Charles Payne is another.  He grasps the difficulty and complexity of analysis. One can learn from these guys,  JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon is another but he tends to speak in unhelpful (for me) generality. 

When you combine the crystal ball with data analysis, with gut feelings, you typify business shows, and you accrue the results you might expect.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please Comment.

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...
Post a Comment
Read more

UNCERTAINTY IS CERTAIN

  Uncertainty is Certain G. Donald Allen 12/12/2024 1.       Introduction . This short essay is about uncertainty in people from both secular and nonsecular viewpoints. One point that will emerge is that randomly based uncertainty can be a driver for religious structure. Many groups facing uncertainty about their future are deeply religious or rely on faith as a source of comfort, resilience, and guidance. The intersection of uncertainty and religiosity often stems from the human need to find meaning, hope, and stability in the face of unpredictable or challenging circumstances. We first take up the connections of uncertainty to religion for the first real profession, farming, noting that hunting has many similar uncertainties. Below are groups that commonly lean on religious beliefs amidst uncertainty.   This short essay is a follow-up to a previous piece on certainty (https://used-ideas.blogspot.com/2024/12/certainty-is-also-emotion.html). U...
Post a Comment
Read more

Robin Hood and Cliven Bundy

  Actor Herbert Mundin, playing Munch in the 1938 film The Adventures of Robin Hood (starring Errol Flynn) is charged by Prince John's troops of slaying a royal deer in the royal Sherwood forest.  The punishment is death.  Though the events of this film are a portrayal of events dating to the 15th century, they became by the 19th century a "robbing from the rich for the poor" theme so often depicted in other film genres. The William Tell legend is another. The plot is simple.  A poor man desperate to survive tastes the forbidden fruits owned by the authority, and is condemned. I would love to hear this event debated on the current TV news shows.  On the one hand, Munch would be a champion in service to his family.  On the other hand, his legal rights are restricted by legal authority. so, the argument would proceed.  Legal scholars cite statutes chapter and verse, while others would root for the common man.  Fast forward to 2014. Parallels ...
Post a Comment
Read more