In retirement, I watch
a lot of business shows. Here the news
is mostly factual, not given to political rhetoric - thankfully. Most of the shows’ hosts bring in financial
leaders to forecast, to project, to explain investment strategies, and
otherwise discuss Wall Street comings and goings. The comments vary, from bull to bear, and
from optimistic to pessimistic, from data to anecdote
Almost without
variation most financial strategists follow first order cause-effect
policies. The market does this, we do
that. Seldom do you see a strategist
with an overall command of fiscal conditions. Their methods are simple and ad hoc. Sometimes, it seems like there
is a predictions club where all read what the others write. This could be a CYA symptom, as they have
high paying jobs and must at all times justify their salaries are well deserved. Some filter their comments through their politics, but either way, it’s useless.
From time to time,
they offer stock picks. Listening and
acting upon their advice is risky. For
example, Halliburton was recommended.
Sources indicated it to be a “buy.” I bought. Down it has come. In another, the stock Rewalk Robotics was
recommended. It was cheap. I bought.
Down it went, but just lately it went to the sky, making me some money.
Some know their stuff
and just how complicated the investment business is. You can just tell. Often, because of this complexity, their remarks
are difficult to follow. Blackstone CEO Stephen A. Schwarzman is typical. His message is complex and encompassing, but
well worth distillation efforts. Fox host Charles Payne is another. He grasps the difficulty and complexity of
analysis. One can learn from these guys,
JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon is another but he tends to speak in unhelpful
(for me) generality.
When you combine the crystal ball with data
analysis, with gut feelings, you typify business shows, and you accrue the
results you might expect.
Comments
Post a Comment
Please Comment.