Skip to main content

Vaccinations - good or bad


Vaccines are here. At first, and with their inventor Pasteur, vaccines were suspect. Then they were accepted. By 1855, the first required vaccines for school children were instituted in Massachusetts. They had a good run, with public trust almost complete.  Then came the first problem with a vaccine that couldn’t track a tricky disease, influenza. Then came a correlation of a vaccine with a worse condition, autism.  Now vaccines again are suspect once again.
  
Case A. We see a decline in flu cases as the use of flu vaccines increase.  Too complicated for many is this simple relation. They see only the first part, the “decline in flu cases,” and so getting the flu vaccine is unnecessary and always inconvenient. So, they don’t. So, more flu cases occur. This initiates a cycle via this simple rule: Fewer flu cases this year implies fewer flu shots next year implies more flu cases. Surprised?

Case B. In another situation, recall the 1998 (false) report that the MMR (Measles-mumps-rubella) vaccine causes autism.  Many “enlightened” parents then declined to have their children so vaccinated. Even after the report was summarily debunked, some parents still continued to deny MMR for their kids. The result was an increase in these diseases in children. 

In the first case we have a false feedback logic and in the second, uninformed reasoning. One problem is that statistical evidence is never 100%.  Give injections of purified water to twenty million and some side effects will occur, statistically insignificant to be sure, but some will read causation in there.  

Currently, required vaccinations for children are true saviors of our very lives:
Diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (DTaP)
Inactivated polio vaccine (IPV)
Measles-mumps-rubella (MMR)
Varicella (chickenpox)
Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib)
Pneumococcal conjugate (PCV13)
Hepatitis B (Hep B)
We would be in deep, really deep, trouble if these vaccines required annual booster shots.

The Pros and Cons of vaccinations are well studied.  At the website https://vaccines.procon.org/, you can find a balanced and reasonable set of both. For example, on the pro side, vaccinations have a huge multiplier effect in costs saved and earned.  Money is always big!  As well, general health is strongly supported by vaccinations. However, each pro and each con consumes a full paragraph of information.  Multiply each by ten, and “everyman” becomes overloaded.  What is important these days is that many people will select just one of these and magnify it to become the one and only pro or con, forgetting the others.

Vaccines are not only here, they are here to stay.

BTW. If you have a vaccination preference, you may be called a “vaxxer” or “antivaxxer.”

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please Comment.

Popular posts from this blog

UNCERTAINTY IS CERTAIN

  Uncertainty is Certain G. Donald Allen 12/12/2024 1.       Introduction . This short essay is about uncertainty in people from both secular and nonsecular viewpoints. One point that will emerge is that randomly based uncertainty can be a driver for religious structure. Many groups facing uncertainty about their future are deeply religious or rely on faith as a source of comfort, resilience, and guidance. The intersection of uncertainty and religiosity often stems from the human need to find meaning, hope, and stability in the face of unpredictable or challenging circumstances. We first take up the connections of uncertainty to religion for the first real profession, farming, noting that hunting has many similar uncertainties. Below are groups that commonly lean on religious beliefs amidst uncertainty.   This short essay is a follow-up to a previous piece on certainty (https://used-ideas.blogspot.com/2024/12/certainty-is-also-emotion.html). U...
Post a Comment
Read more

Problem Solving? Then Find Those Gaps

  Problem Solving - Finding Gaps 12/28/2024 Introduction. Solving complex problems often arises from the presence of gaps in knowledge, resources, understanding, or perspectives. These gaps introduce uncertainty, ambiguity, or constraints, making solutions difficult to achieve. Below, we explore the primary types of gaps that complicate problem-solving and their implications. Many are of the technical, informational, theoretical, and social nature. You may discover some of these gaps are also sources of uncertainty in problem-solving, in that they supply us with another list of things that can go wrong based on something missing. Gaps also form a type of impossible problem, that will be discussed in a later chapter. Finally, this essay is about all problems and solutions, not just those of science. Contents Comprehension Gaps Consistency Gaps Solution-Type Gaps Invisible Gaps   Knowledge and Evidence Gaps   Methodological and Technological Gaps Ethical and Cult...
Post a Comment
Read more

CERTAINTY IS ALSO AN EMOTION

  Certainty is also a Feeling Certainty is often viewed as a mental state tied to knowledge and confidence, but it also functions as a feeling with distinct emotional and physiological components. While it arises from cognitive processes, certainty also has a subjective and emotional quality that makes it more than just a rational judgment. It provides a sense of assurance and security that shapes human experience in profound ways. Emotional Dimension . At its core, certainty evokes emotions that influence how we perceive and interact with the world. When someone feels certain, they often experience relief, comfort, or empowerment. These emotions are particularly strong when uncertainty or doubt is resolved, offering a sense of closure. For example, solving a complex problem or having a belief validated by evidence brings not just intellectual satisfaction but also emotional reassurance. Subjectivity. Certainty is inherently personal and subjective. It depends on individual...
Post a Comment
Read more