Skip to main content

Scorecard for Planet Earth


What’s good about the world? 

We’re not looking for miracles or final results. We are looking for improvement.  Let’s not look at the world we don’t have now, but look more at the far and recent past where almost nothing was possible, available, accessible, and the like. 

Our list does not include everyone everywhere.  Progress is not constant nor uniform.  In some places forward steps come in leaps while in others backward steps seem the rule. 

With all we hear daily of riots here, wars there, violence in the streets, intrigue in the palace, assassinations,  subversions, perversions, and all others, we take a pause and consider what we have is far, far beyond the situations of almost all only a century or two ago.   

 We now live in a world where most people---
  • Have some civil rights.
  • Have basic schooling.
  • Have machines to make life easier.
  • Have food produced by an agricultural bounty.
  • Have some rights to practice a religion of choice.
  • Are neither slaves nor indentured.
  • Can vote.
  • Can seek desirable employment or self-employment.
  • Can gravitate toward a better life.
  • Can live in peace.
  • Can read to better understand life.
  • Can travel, explore, and select a personal lifestyle.
  • Enjoy clean air, water, and sanitation.
  • Know torture is not a lever of compliance.

It is remarkable that some decline these gains in favor of a Utopian conquest. It is remarkable that some see only faults and depressing conditions.  This is not an appeal to globalism which has its own entire set of unexpected and unintended consequences, nor simplistic policies of open borders, one government for all, pure capitalistic measures, or rule by the barrel of a gun – all being projections of complexity to understandable simplicity.

What is important is to keep a scorecard transcending your lifetime, before and beyond.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Human Simulation is Possible - by Humans

  Human Simulation: Agent-Based Modeling and the Computational Case for Our Reality   1.       Introduction In the essay, we introduce the notion that humanity could be a deliberate simulation based on an extremely simple single-celled organism, hardly anything more complex than that. This will allow an (apparently) new interpretation of the notion that humanity is simulated, but that there is no master engineer at a massive number of dials and switches, responsible for every twist and turn of our universe and lives. We begin with the notion that the universe exists and operates under its own laws. So, given the Earth [2] , when and where life first began, it was infused with a living agent, self-actualized, reproductive, and with other basic rules for its operations, interactions, and much of what single-celled organisms do today. The idea from this occurred some years back when writing code in ActionScript (formerly Flash), I was able to create...

The Calculus of Ideas and Patterns

  Introduction. When dealing with ideas, patterns, intuition, and brainstorming, we need operations or rules not unlike those of arithmetic. The goal is not proof, a finished device, or a fait accompli , but rather a foundation for further investigation and study. In some cases, these operations may yield a proposition, that is, something capable of being proved. In this sense, they form a practical logic of intuition. The article concludes with a few select examples from a variety of venues. Setting. We are working with a given idea, problem, or project, or simply just thinking. Our aim is to discover pathways, patterns, or conceptual connections that may be useful. The following operations describe ways in which ideas and patterns can be generated, transformed, or refined. These also work toward understanding the imagination. Yet, this framework is distinguished from formal logic and proof. We are tempted to call them as “soft logic” because while nothing is proved, reasons...

Freedom of Speech

  Think of freedom of speech as a living organism. Then think of what is required for it to survive. Coming to mind are a population agreeable to its constitution (its environment) and the institutions (its nutrients) that keep it healthy. Currently, many institutions, including some political parties, question unfettered freedom of speech and are working to deny it, claiming it is unhealthy for the body politic. Yes? No?