Skip to main content

Solving Personal Problems



You have personal problems; I have personal problems. In some cases, the “we” have problems. Secular personal problems have difficulties all their own. How do you solve them, or where do you get help?  Aside from medication, which ultimately fails long term, four solution methods are available.  For problems related to health or work, other methods are used.

A.    (Reverberation model). Two friends meet to discuss problems.  Both talk continuously about their personal problems and talk over the other, with hardly a murmur about the other.  Yet, each nods, smiles, or frowns as appropriate.  During the cacophony of chatter, each has the illusion of giving help.  Such pairs are usually self-absorbed to the point they are scarcely aware of the other. Who knows if any problem is solved, but just talking them through often helps.

B.    (Sounding Board model). Here we have the one explaining problems to the other, with only a nod or head shake are needed.  This person is listening to herself; any value comes from hearing this “external” voice.  Needed is a good listener.  The reverberation model could be also called a noisy sounding board.

C.    (Feedback Loop).  Here we have the one telling the problems to another and the listener is trying to help by clarifying, by suggesting, by concluding, and by questioning.  Needed is a good but intelligent listener, as it is so easy to get bad advice.  Giving bad advice is a career choice with job title “counselor.”  High schools are full of them.  What the listener must understand is the personal responsibility coming from giving advice.  What if it is taken?  On the other hand, those problem-burdened must select carefully from whom to seek advice. Professional psychologists, friends, and clergymen are common sources.  For a few, it may the barber, barrister, or bartender. As with most illness, many problems dissolve or disappear in time’s course.

D.    (Echo Chamber model). You have a problem and you think it through and through, echoing it over and back your mind. Finally, possible solutions or resolutions occur. You consider these solutions through and through, possibly electing one of them. Go.  But sometimes nothing. The problem remains.  One risk is you can think yourself into a corner where the problem is constant, continual, maybe worse, but never solved.

In each, a considered trust is vested in the listener for both confidentiality and any advice offered. Bad advice acts more like a poison than merely a bad meal.  In the echo chamber, there is an implied trust in one’s own ability to solve the problem.  If by analogy, you live your life traveling down raging rapids, it may be difficult to imagine any solution placing you in a blue lagoon.

Which side of the conversation are you on, reverb, sounding board,  or feedback?  Perhaps you live in your own echo chamber.  Always, it is good to know.  Indeed, some use all, depending on the problem.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

Where is AI (Artificial Intelligence) Going?

  How to view Artificial Intelligence (AI).  Imagine you go to the store to buy a TV, but all they have are 1950s models, black and white, circular screens, picture rolls, and picture imperfect, no remote. You’d say no thanks. Back in the day, they sold wildly. The TV was a must-have for everyone with $250 to spend* (about $3000 today). Compared to where AI is today, this is more or less where TVs were 70 years ago. In only a few decades AI will be advanced beyond comprehension, just like TVs today are from the 50s viewpoint. Just like we could not imagine where the video concept was going back then, we cannot really imagine where AI is going. Buckle up. But it will be spectacular.    *Back then minimum wage was $0.75/hr. Thus, a TV cost more than eight weeks' wages. ------------------------- 

Fake News

If you've been following the news the last couple of days, you will note the flurry of copy devoted to fake news.  Both sides are blaming whatever has befallen them the consequence of fake news.  Let's look at this phenomenon a bit.    When I was a student years ago, a friend climbed some mountain in Peru.   A article was written in the local newspaper about the event.   In only three column inches, the newspaper made about six errors.   An easy article to write you say?   Just interview and reproduce.   Yet so many errors?   The question is this: was this fake news or bad reporting?   The idea here is that fake news comes in various flavors. Bad reporting – errors made by the author or editor Opinion presented as news     Deliberate creation of falsehoods to favor a point of view       The reporting of selected truths to favor a particular point of view Now we have the big social media ...