Skip to main content

Solving Personal Problems



You have personal problems; I have personal problems. In some cases, the “we” have problems. Secular personal problems have difficulties all their own. How do you solve them, or where do you get help?  Aside from medication, which ultimately fails long term, four solution methods are available.  For problems related to health or work, other methods are used.

A.    (Reverberation model). Two friends meet to discuss problems.  Both talk continuously about their personal problems and talk over the other, with hardly a murmur about the other.  Yet, each nods, smiles, or frowns as appropriate.  During the cacophony of chatter, each has the illusion of giving help.  Such pairs are usually self-absorbed to the point they are scarcely aware of the other. Who knows if any problem is solved, but just talking them through often helps.

B.    (Sounding Board model). Here we have the one explaining problems to the other, with only a nod or head shake are needed.  This person is listening to herself; any value comes from hearing this “external” voice.  Needed is a good listener.  The reverberation model could be also called a noisy sounding board.

C.    (Feedback Loop).  Here we have the one telling the problems to another and the listener is trying to help by clarifying, by suggesting, by concluding, and by questioning.  Needed is a good but intelligent listener, as it is so easy to get bad advice.  Giving bad advice is a career choice with job title “counselor.”  High schools are full of them.  What the listener must understand is the personal responsibility coming from giving advice.  What if it is taken?  On the other hand, those problem-burdened must select carefully from whom to seek advice. Professional psychologists, friends, and clergymen are common sources.  For a few, it may the barber, barrister, or bartender. As with most illness, many problems dissolve or disappear in time’s course.

D.    (Echo Chamber model). You have a problem and you think it through and through, echoing it over and back your mind. Finally, possible solutions or resolutions occur. You consider these solutions through and through, possibly electing one of them. Go.  But sometimes nothing. The problem remains.  One risk is you can think yourself into a corner where the problem is constant, continual, maybe worse, but never solved.

In each, a considered trust is vested in the listener for both confidentiality and any advice offered. Bad advice acts more like a poison than merely a bad meal.  In the echo chamber, there is an implied trust in one’s own ability to solve the problem.  If by analogy, you live your life traveling down raging rapids, it may be difficult to imagine any solution placing you in a blue lagoon.

Which side of the conversation are you on, reverb, sounding board,  or feedback?  Perhaps you live in your own echo chamber.  Always, it is good to know.  Indeed, some use all, depending on the problem.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Accepting Fake Information

Every day, we are all bombarded with information, especially on news channels.  One group claims it's false; another calls it the truth. How can we know when to accept it or alternatively how can we know it's false? There are several factors which influence acceptance of fake or false information. Here are the big four.  Some just don’t have the knowledge to discern fact/truth from fiction/fact/false*. Some fake information is cleverly disguised and simply appears to be correct. Some fake information is accepted because the person wants to believe it. Some fake information is accepted because there is no other information to the contrary. However, the acceptance of  information  of any kind become a kind of  truth , and this is a well studied topic. In the link below is an essay on “The Truth About Truth.” This shows simply that what is your point of view, different types of information are generally accepted, fake or not.   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/g-donald-allen-420b03

Your Brain Within Your Brain

  Your Bicameral Brain by Don Allen Have you ever gone to another room to get something, but when you got there you forgot what you were after? Have you ever experienced a flash of insight, but when you went to look it up online, you couldn’t even remember the keyword? You think you forgot it completely. How can it happen so fast? You worry your memory is failing. Are you merely absent-minded? You try to be amused. But maybe you didn’t forget.   Just maybe that flash of insight, clear and present for an instant, was never given in the verbal form, but another type of intelligence you possess, that you use, and that communicates only to you. We are trained to live in a verbal world, where words matter most. Aside from emotions, we are unable to conjure up other, nonverbal, forms of intelligence we primitively, pre-verbally, possess but don’t know how to use. Alas, we live in a world of words, stewing in the alphabet, sleeping under pages of paragraphs, almost ignoring one of

Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious?

  Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious? I truly like the study of consciousness, though it is safe to say no one really knows what it is. Some philosophers has avoided the problem by claiming consciousness simply doesn’t exist. It's the ultimate escape clause. However, the "therefore, it does not exist" argument also applies to "truth", "God", and even "reality" all quite beyond a consensus description for at least three millennia. For each issue or problem defying description or understanding, simply escape the problem by claiming it doesn’t exist. Problem solved or problem avoided? Alternately, as Daniel Dennett explains consciousness as an account of the various calculations occurring in the brain at close to the same time. However, he goes on to say that consciousness is so insignificant, especially compared to our exalted notions of it, that it might as well not exist [1] . Oh, well. Getting back to consciousness, most of us have view