Skip to main content

Preparing the Politician



We made it through the last election cycle, I think, finally. The balance of power has shifted just a bit.  Yet, it is in no way clear what will happen.  The three preceding sentences could have been written in many years past.  So, we at least biennially get the new crop.  Not chemically enhanced, genetically engineered, nor fertilized, much less vaccinated, this crop is much the same as always.  In the parley of cookery, we call the outcome pot luck. 

We’re at that time of the season to discuss what’s for dinner.  Our chefs are local and we trust their excellence.  Let’s suppose this time we’re preparing a (nice juicy) politician as the main course.  This happens you know.  When families get together, politics may not come from the kitchen but sit there at the table, offering food for dispute, often helping with indigestion. 

Let’s make a top ten list of these political birds and what we want to see.  And let’s try to do it without politics.  Maybe that’s like ordering fries without salt, but today we try for nutrition first of all.  As usual, let’s do it by the numbers, talking both to the cook and the politician.

10.  Ability to raise funds. If you can't raise a nickel, you'll have none to spend to promote your candidacy.  On the other hand if raising money is your only skill, you are unsuitable, as then everything is money.

9.  A very thick skin. Criticize, criticize, let nothing done escape the eyes.  Whatever you've done has a negative spin, and your opponent will attack.  You live under siege.  Does the “drumstick” kick back?

8.  General knowledge of history. As the great philosopher George Santayana instructs us, if we don't “remember history we are condemned to repeat it.”  Lately, we've seen too many repeats.  Indeed, too many politicians, many who rely only on talking points, seem to know abysmally little history. 

7.  Ability to win or lose gracefully. Once in the election loop, your chance of losing is substantial.  Can you lose?  But also, can you humbly win without the proverbial finger point in the opponent's eye?  In the current year most losers do lose well. Not all.

6.  Understanding of people’s needs.  Do you understand the needs of people, not just their desires? Do you understand how business functions? Do you conflate your ideology with what people need?  Better not or you’ll be well overdone.

5.  Record of ability to work with others.  Show me, show me, show me how you have worked with others on projects. Too many new elected haven’t really worked on anything with anyone, except to get elected. 

4.  Knowledge of political process. You really should know how to make a bill and engineer its way through the political process. How to gain support?  Too many not hold the line to do it my way only.  Compromise is nearly dead.

3.  Strong consideration for public good. Language used indicates this as a principle consideration. Do you have a balanced understanding of what public good actually is?  It transcends just regulations, laws, and rules.  We are moving away from the measurable toward the emotional.

2.  Record of tangible accomplishments. Not theory, not ideology, not speeches, not books, not op-eds, but something actually done. No record implies we expect little, or less, or nothing at all.

And the number one criteria for preparing the juiciest politician comes off with the final product cooked and served. It can be hard to detect before the election, though always claimed at the top.

1.  Love and care for people and country. Something not quite measurable but the discriminating voter feels. Not enough of such folks ever run for office. If the politician doesn’t love people and country, other factors motivate action and service – many undesirable.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Human Simulation is Possible - by Humans

  Human Simulation: Agent-Based Modeling and the Computational Case for Our Reality   1.       Introduction In the essay, we introduce the notion that humanity could be a deliberate simulation based on an extremely simple single-celled organism, hardly anything more complex than that. This will allow an (apparently) new interpretation of the notion that humanity is simulated, but that there is no master engineer at a massive number of dials and switches, responsible for every twist and turn of our universe and lives. We begin with the notion that the universe exists and operates under its own laws. So, given the Earth [2] , when and where life first began, it was infused with a living agent, self-actualized, reproductive, and with other basic rules for its operations, interactions, and much of what single-celled organisms do today. The idea from this occurred some years back when writing code in ActionScript (formerly Flash), I was able to create...

The Calculus of Ideas and Patterns

  Introduction. When dealing with ideas, patterns, intuition, and brainstorming, we need operations or rules not unlike those of arithmetic. The goal is not proof, a finished device, or a fait accompli , but rather a foundation for further investigation and study. In some cases, these operations may yield a proposition, that is, something capable of being proved. In this sense, they form a practical logic of intuition. The article concludes with a few select examples from a variety of venues. Setting. We are working with a given idea, problem, or project, or simply just thinking. Our aim is to discover pathways, patterns, or conceptual connections that may be useful. The following operations describe ways in which ideas and patterns can be generated, transformed, or refined. These also work toward understanding the imagination. Yet, this framework is distinguished from formal logic and proof. We are tempted to call them as “soft logic” because while nothing is proved, reasons...

Freedom of Speech

  Think of freedom of speech as a living organism. Then think of what is required for it to survive. Coming to mind are a population agreeable to its constitution (its environment) and the institutions (its nutrients) that keep it healthy. Currently, many institutions, including some political parties, question unfettered freedom of speech and are working to deny it, claiming it is unhealthy for the body politic. Yes? No?