We made
it through the last election cycle, I think, finally. The balance of power has
shifted just a bit. Yet, it is in no way
clear what will happen. The three
preceding sentences could have been written in many years past. So, we at least biennially get the new
crop. Not chemically enhanced,
genetically engineered, nor fertilized, much less vaccinated, this crop is much the same as
always. In the parley of cookery, we call the
outcome pot luck.
We’re at
that time of the season to discuss what’s for dinner. Our chefs are local and we trust their
excellence. Let’s suppose this time we’re
preparing a (nice juicy) politician as the main course. This happens you know. When families get together, politics may not come
from the kitchen but sit there at the table, offering food for dispute, often
helping with indigestion.
Let’s
make a top ten list of these
political birds and what we want to see.
And let’s try to do it without politics.
Maybe that’s like ordering fries without salt, but today we try for
nutrition first of all. As usual, let’s
do it by the numbers, talking both to the cook and the politician.
10. Ability
to raise funds. If you
can't raise a nickel, you'll have none to spend to promote your candidacy. On the other hand if raising money is your only
skill, you are unsuitable, as then everything is money.
9. A
very thick skin. Criticize,
criticize, let nothing done escape the eyes.
Whatever you've done has a negative spin, and your opponent will
attack. You live under siege. Does the “drumstick” kick back?
8. General
knowledge of history. As the
great philosopher George Santayana instructs us, if we don't “remember history we
are condemned to repeat it.” Lately,
we've seen too many repeats. Indeed, too
many politicians, many who rely only on talking points, seem to know abysmally little
history.
7. Ability
to win or lose gracefully. Once in
the election loop, your chance of losing is substantial. Can you lose?
But also, can you humbly win without the proverbial finger point in the
opponent's eye? In the current year most
losers do lose well. Not all.
6. Understanding
of people’s needs.
Do you understand the needs of people, not
just their desires? Do you understand how business functions? Do you conflate
your ideology with what people need?
Better not or you’ll be well overdone.
5. Record
of ability to work with others.
Show me, show me, show me how you have worked
with others on projects. Too many new elected haven’t really worked on anything
with anyone, except to get elected.
4. Knowledge
of political process. You
really should know how to make a bill and engineer its way through the
political process. How to gain support?
Too many not hold the line to do it my way only. Compromise is nearly dead.
3. Strong
consideration for public good. Language
used indicates this as a principle consideration. Do you have a balanced
understanding of what public good actually is?
It transcends just regulations, laws, and rules. We are moving away from the measurable toward
the emotional.
2. Record
of tangible accomplishments. Not
theory, not ideology, not speeches, not books, not op-eds, but something
actually done. No record implies we expect little, or less, or nothing at all.
And the number one criteria
for preparing the juiciest politician comes off with the final product cooked
and served. It can be hard to detect before the election, though always claimed
at the top.
1. Love
and care for people and country. Something
not quite measurable but the discriminating voter feels. Not enough of such
folks ever run for office. If the politician doesn’t love people and country,
other factors motivate action and service – many undesirable.
Comments
Post a Comment
Please Comment.