Skip to main content

Preparing the Politician



We made it through the last election cycle, I think, finally. The balance of power has shifted just a bit.  Yet, it is in no way clear what will happen.  The three preceding sentences could have been written in many years past.  So, we at least biennially get the new crop.  Not chemically enhanced, genetically engineered, nor fertilized, much less vaccinated, this crop is much the same as always.  In the parley of cookery, we call the outcome pot luck

We’re at that time of the season to discuss what’s for dinner.  Our chefs are local and we trust their excellence.  Let’s suppose this time we’re preparing a (nice juicy) politician as the main course.  This happens you know.  When families get together, politics may not come from the kitchen but sit there at the table, offering food for dispute, often helping with indigestion. 

Let’s make a top ten list of these political birds and what we want to see.  And let’s try to do it without politics.  Maybe that’s like ordering fries without salt, but today we try for nutrition first of all.  As usual, let’s do it by the numbers, talking both to the cook and the politician.

10.  Ability to raise funds. If you can't raise a nickel, you'll have none to spend to promote your candidacy.  On the other hand if raising money is your only skill, you are unsuitable, as then everything is money.

9.  A very thick skin. Criticize, criticize, let nothing done escape the eyes.  Whatever you've done has a negative spin, and your opponent will attack.  You live under siege.  Does the “drumstick” kick back?

8.  General knowledge of history. As the great philosopher George Santayana instructs us, if we don't “remember history we are condemned to repeat it.”  Lately, we've seen too many repeats.  Indeed, too many politicians, many who rely only on talking points, seem to know abysmally little history. 

7.  Ability to win or lose gracefully. Once in the election loop, your chance of losing is substantial.  Can you lose?  But also, can you humbly win without the proverbial finger point in the opponent's eye?  In the current year most losers do lose well. Not all.

6.  Understanding of people’s needs.  Do you understand the needs of people, not just their desires? Do you understand how business functions? Do you conflate your ideology with what people need?  Better not or you’ll be well overdone.

5.  Record of ability to work with others.  Show me, show me, show me how you have worked with others on projects. Too many new elected haven’t really worked on anything with anyone, except to get elected. 

4.  Knowledge of political process. You really should know how to make a bill and engineer its way through the political process. How to gain support?  Too many not hold the line to do it my way only.  Compromise is nearly dead.

3.  Strong consideration for public good. Language used indicates this as a principle consideration. Do you have a balanced understanding of what public good actually is?  It transcends just regulations, laws, and rules.  We are moving away from the measurable toward the emotional.

2.  Record of tangible accomplishments. Not theory, not ideology, not speeches, not books, not op-eds, but something actually done. No record implies we expect little, or less, or nothing at all.

And the number one criteria for preparing the juiciest politician comes off with the final product cooked and served. It can be hard to detect before the election, though always claimed at the top.

1.  Love and care for people and country. Something not quite measurable but the discriminating voter feels. Not enough of such folks ever run for office. If the politician doesn’t love people and country, other factors motivate action and service – many undesirable.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Accepting Fake Information

Every day, we are all bombarded with information, especially on news channels.  One group claims it's false; another calls it the truth. How can we know when to accept it or alternatively how can we know it's false? There are several factors which influence acceptance of fake or false information. Here are the big four.  Some just don’t have the knowledge to discern fact/truth from fiction/fact/false*. Some fake information is cleverly disguised and simply appears to be correct. Some fake information is accepted because the person wants to believe it. Some fake information is accepted because there is no other information to the contrary. However, the acceptance of  information  of any kind become a kind of  truth , and this is a well studied topic. In the link below is an essay on “The Truth About Truth.” This shows simply that what is your point of view, different types of information are generally accepted, fake or not.   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/g-donald-allen-420b03

Your Brain Within Your Brain

  Your Bicameral Brain by Don Allen Have you ever gone to another room to get something, but when you got there you forgot what you were after? Have you ever experienced a flash of insight, but when you went to look it up online, you couldn’t even remember the keyword? You think you forgot it completely. How can it happen so fast? You worry your memory is failing. Are you merely absent-minded? You try to be amused. But maybe you didn’t forget.   Just maybe that flash of insight, clear and present for an instant, was never given in the verbal form, but another type of intelligence you possess, that you use, and that communicates only to you. We are trained to live in a verbal world, where words matter most. Aside from emotions, we are unable to conjure up other, nonverbal, forms of intelligence we primitively, pre-verbally, possess but don’t know how to use. Alas, we live in a world of words, stewing in the alphabet, sleeping under pages of paragraphs, almost ignoring one of

Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious?

  Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious? I truly like the study of consciousness, though it is safe to say no one really knows what it is. Some philosophers has avoided the problem by claiming consciousness simply doesn’t exist. It's the ultimate escape clause. However, the "therefore, it does not exist" argument also applies to "truth", "God", and even "reality" all quite beyond a consensus description for at least three millennia. For each issue or problem defying description or understanding, simply escape the problem by claiming it doesn’t exist. Problem solved or problem avoided? Alternately, as Daniel Dennett explains consciousness as an account of the various calculations occurring in the brain at close to the same time. However, he goes on to say that consciousness is so insignificant, especially compared to our exalted notions of it, that it might as well not exist [1] . Oh, well. Getting back to consciousness, most of us have view