Skip to main content

The Logic of Hate



If hate is a disease, it is virile, vile, contagious, and lethal.  It has sanctioned all varieties of murderous activity, including war and the destruction of entire groups, ethnically, religiously, and politically.  This emotion of destruction compels those infected with a single-mindedness overwhelming any sense of propriety.  It defeats normal logic and decency.
Associated,  there is a logic, and it’s simple.  Call it the first order propositional logic of hate

"If A hates B and B loves C, then A hates C."

This is also a type of converse transitivity.  Aristotle, of course, would be dismayed. You may say the logic of hate is ridiculous.  Yet, the philosophers have constructed quite an interesting and complete logic of belief.  It even has a name, Doxastic logic. Just Google it.

Applications:
a. Let A = Catholics, B = Protestants, and C = Martin Luther.  (maybe a little dated)
b. Let A= Muslims, B = Infidels, and C = Baptists or any religion.
c. Let A = Party I, B =  Party II, and C = Party II rules
d. Let A = DEMS, B = Trump, and C = Any Appointment
e. Let A = Election loser, B = Election winner, and C = New policies
f. Let A = Hatfields, B = McCoys, and C = Just about anything.
g. Let A= Anarchist, B= Government, and C = Order

Not surprising that some of these have religious overtones. Statues and other laws forbid its application elsewhere.  For example, the Police are not often allowed to use it in making arrests. Nor are the courts in convicting the accused. Mostly.

Thousands of novels and hundreds of movies have been produced where the logic of hate is the undertow if not the full basis of the plot.

The logic of hatred is not always applied blindly on its face. Self-proclaimed intellectuals, politicians,  and officials would feel silly admitting it.  Thus, its adherence requires alternate reasons for the transitivity to C. It could be a sexual charge, a subversion of accepted scripture, or other prototypical examples.   It is reminiscent of that the old logic about American Indians, “The only good Indian is a dead Indian,” is based on a couple of atrocities.

Important to note is that hate and love are not opposites, nor is the one a negation of the other, but rather extremes of emotion. Thus, the logic is a somewhat non standard.  For example, it is not transitive, as in If A hates B and B hates C, then A hates C. As well it is not symmetric as in If A hates B, then B hates A, a proscription of many religions. Thus, the logic of hate is nonlinear. As well it is multidimensional, both in concordance with the nature of emotions. 

On basic logic, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-order_logic#Provable_identities

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Accepting Fake Information

Every day, we are all bombarded with information, especially on news channels.  One group claims it's false; another calls it the truth. How can we know when to accept it or alternatively how can we know it's false? There are several factors which influence acceptance of fake or false information. Here are the big four.  Some just don’t have the knowledge to discern fact/truth from fiction/fact/false*. Some fake information is cleverly disguised and simply appears to be correct. Some fake information is accepted because the person wants to believe it. Some fake information is accepted because there is no other information to the contrary. However, the acceptance of  information  of any kind become a kind of  truth , and this is a well studied topic. In the link below is an essay on “The Truth About Truth.” This shows simply that what is your point of view, different types of information are generally accepted, fake or not.   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/g-donald-allen-420b03

Your Brain Within Your Brain

  Your Bicameral Brain by Don Allen Have you ever gone to another room to get something, but when you got there you forgot what you were after? Have you ever experienced a flash of insight, but when you went to look it up online, you couldn’t even remember the keyword? You think you forgot it completely. How can it happen so fast? You worry your memory is failing. Are you merely absent-minded? You try to be amused. But maybe you didn’t forget.   Just maybe that flash of insight, clear and present for an instant, was never given in the verbal form, but another type of intelligence you possess, that you use, and that communicates only to you. We are trained to live in a verbal world, where words matter most. Aside from emotions, we are unable to conjure up other, nonverbal, forms of intelligence we primitively, pre-verbally, possess but don’t know how to use. Alas, we live in a world of words, stewing in the alphabet, sleeping under pages of paragraphs, almost ignoring one of

Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious?

  Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious? I truly like the study of consciousness, though it is safe to say no one really knows what it is. Some philosophers has avoided the problem by claiming consciousness simply doesn’t exist. It's the ultimate escape clause. However, the "therefore, it does not exist" argument also applies to "truth", "God", and even "reality" all quite beyond a consensus description for at least three millennia. For each issue or problem defying description or understanding, simply escape the problem by claiming it doesn’t exist. Problem solved or problem avoided? Alternately, as Daniel Dennett explains consciousness as an account of the various calculations occurring in the brain at close to the same time. However, he goes on to say that consciousness is so insignificant, especially compared to our exalted notions of it, that it might as well not exist [1] . Oh, well. Getting back to consciousness, most of us have view