Skip to main content

Gossip, Innuendo, and Worse



As with many occupations, many use similar methods though applied to differing venues. For example, teachers of different subjects. Ditto for engineers, psychologists, law enforcers, attorneys, and more. Today, it is the turn for public commentators – all stripes.

The gossip columnist needs to be correct only occasionally. In accuracy, most need only to be close -  like in horseshoes, but out of slander’s reach. This makes for a lucrative life whose subjects know what fear and gossip can do.  Such is the brutal world of public individuals whose lives can be wrecked by a single shot. 

News pundits, and junior versions, need only be plausible and have a constituency. Each needs only to avoid totally blatant, provable lies, concentrating on rumor and innuendo with a few selected truths mixed in.  Freedom of speech grants this right to everyone.  You or I cannot take advantage except at home, but many make a living on innuendo, in the press, on TV, in books, in blogs, and interviews.

Having even a less burden are the business analysts.  They need only suggest directions, stocks, or trends.  They have alt-cover by another projecting and suggesting the exact opposite.  With the vagueness of market meanderings, anyone is potentially correct at least half the time.  Anyway, the business climate is so volatile, projections are soon forgotten, if they are believed in the first place.

Worst of all are the politicians, for whom gossip, rumor, and innuendo are mother’s milk.  For these folks, downright lies and deceit are the common fair.  Slander in small doses is even ok.  Low cal and fat free, their communications give meaning to old-fashioned demagoguery. Make a voter afraid or make the public cower is a recipe for success.  

With a bit of self-reflection, we arrive at the deep bottom.  The Blogger follows no rules of accuracy, truth, or whatever. Anything goes. The strongest requirement is slight, that of approximately 8th grade grammar.

The world of gossip, rumor, innuendo, suggestion, projection, and downright lies enjoys a large population with thousands possessing or applying for lucrative jobs. Why insist on knowing like the scientist, they ask, when you can do as well with mere hints?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

UNCERTAINTY IS CERTAIN

  Uncertainty is Certain G. Donald Allen 12/12/2024 1.       Introduction . This short essay is about uncertainty in people from both secular and nonsecular viewpoints. One point that will emerge is that randomly based uncertainty can be a driver for religious structure. Many groups facing uncertainty about their future are deeply religious or rely on faith as a source of comfort, resilience, and guidance. The intersection of uncertainty and religiosity often stems from the human need to find meaning, hope, and stability in the face of unpredictable or challenging circumstances. We first take up the connections of uncertainty to religion for the first real profession, farming, noting that hunting has many similar uncertainties. Below are groups that commonly lean on religious beliefs amidst uncertainty.   This short essay is a follow-up to a previous piece on certainty (https://used-ideas.blogspot.com/2024/12/certainty-is-also-emotion.html). U...

Robin Hood and Cliven Bundy

  Actor Herbert Mundin, playing Munch in the 1938 film The Adventures of Robin Hood (starring Errol Flynn) is charged by Prince John's troops of slaying a royal deer in the royal Sherwood forest.  The punishment is death.  Though the events of this film are a portrayal of events dating to the 15th century, they became by the 19th century a "robbing from the rich for the poor" theme so often depicted in other film genres. The William Tell legend is another. The plot is simple.  A poor man desperate to survive tastes the forbidden fruits owned by the authority, and is condemned. I would love to hear this event debated on the current TV news shows.  On the one hand, Munch would be a champion in service to his family.  On the other hand, his legal rights are restricted by legal authority. so, the argument would proceed.  Legal scholars cite statutes chapter and verse, while others would root for the common man.  Fast forward to 2014. Parallels ...