Skip to main content

Gossip, Innuendo, and Worse



As with many occupations, many use similar methods though applied to differing venues. For example, teachers of different subjects. Ditto for engineers, psychologists, law enforcers, attorneys, and more. Today, it is the turn for public commentators – all stripes.

The gossip columnist needs to be correct only occasionally. In accuracy, most need only to be close -  like in horseshoes, but out of slander’s reach. This makes for a lucrative life whose subjects know what fear and gossip can do.  Such is the brutal world of public individuals whose lives can be wrecked by a single shot. 

News pundits, and junior versions, need only be plausible and have a constituency. Each needs only to avoid totally blatant, provable lies, concentrating on rumor and innuendo with a few selected truths mixed in.  Freedom of speech grants this right to everyone.  You or I cannot take advantage except at home, but many make a living on innuendo, in the press, on TV, in books, in blogs, and interviews.

Having even a less burden are the business analysts.  They need only suggest directions, stocks, or trends.  They have alt-cover by another projecting and suggesting the exact opposite.  With the vagueness of market meanderings, anyone is potentially correct at least half the time.  Anyway, the business climate is so volatile, projections are soon forgotten, if they are believed in the first place.

Worst of all are the politicians, for whom gossip, rumor, and innuendo are mother’s milk.  For these folks, downright lies and deceit are the common fair.  Slander in small doses is even ok.  Low cal and fat free, their communications give meaning to old-fashioned demagoguery. Make a voter afraid or make the public cower is a recipe for success.  

With a bit of self-reflection, we arrive at the deep bottom.  The Blogger follows no rules of accuracy, truth, or whatever. Anything goes. The strongest requirement is slight, that of approximately 8th grade grammar.

The world of gossip, rumor, innuendo, suggestion, projection, and downright lies enjoys a large population with thousands possessing or applying for lucrative jobs. Why insist on knowing like the scientist, they ask, when you can do as well with mere hints?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Accepting Fake Information

Every day, we are all bombarded with information, especially on news channels.  One group claims it's false; another calls it the truth. How can we know when to accept it or alternatively how can we know it's false? There are several factors which influence acceptance of fake or false information. Here are the big four.  Some just don’t have the knowledge to discern fact/truth from fiction/fact/false*. Some fake information is cleverly disguised and simply appears to be correct. Some fake information is accepted because the person wants to believe it. Some fake information is accepted because there is no other information to the contrary. However, the acceptance of  information  of any kind become a kind of  truth , and this is a well studied topic. In the link below is an essay on “The Truth About Truth.” This shows simply that what is your point of view, different types of information are generally accepted, fake or not.   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/g-donald-allen-420b03

Your Brain Within Your Brain

  Your Bicameral Brain by Don Allen Have you ever gone to another room to get something, but when you got there you forgot what you were after? Have you ever experienced a flash of insight, but when you went to look it up online, you couldn’t even remember the keyword? You think you forgot it completely. How can it happen so fast? You worry your memory is failing. Are you merely absent-minded? You try to be amused. But maybe you didn’t forget.   Just maybe that flash of insight, clear and present for an instant, was never given in the verbal form, but another type of intelligence you possess, that you use, and that communicates only to you. We are trained to live in a verbal world, where words matter most. Aside from emotions, we are unable to conjure up other, nonverbal, forms of intelligence we primitively, pre-verbally, possess but don’t know how to use. Alas, we live in a world of words, stewing in the alphabet, sleeping under pages of paragraphs, almost ignoring one of

Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious?

  Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious? I truly like the study of consciousness, though it is safe to say no one really knows what it is. Some philosophers has avoided the problem by claiming consciousness simply doesn’t exist. It's the ultimate escape clause. However, the "therefore, it does not exist" argument also applies to "truth", "God", and even "reality" all quite beyond a consensus description for at least three millennia. For each issue or problem defying description or understanding, simply escape the problem by claiming it doesn’t exist. Problem solved or problem avoided? Alternately, as Daniel Dennett explains consciousness as an account of the various calculations occurring in the brain at close to the same time. However, he goes on to say that consciousness is so insignificant, especially compared to our exalted notions of it, that it might as well not exist [1] . Oh, well. Getting back to consciousness, most of us have view