Skip to main content

Gossip, Innuendo, and Worse



As with many occupations, many use similar methods though applied to differing venues. For example, teachers of different subjects. Ditto for engineers, psychologists, law enforcers, attorneys, and more. Today, it is the turn for public commentators – all stripes.

The gossip columnist needs to be correct only occasionally. In accuracy, most need only to be close -  like in horseshoes, but out of slander’s reach. This makes for a lucrative life whose subjects know what fear and gossip can do.  Such is the brutal world of public individuals whose lives can be wrecked by a single shot. 

News pundits, and junior versions, need only be plausible and have a constituency. Each needs only to avoid totally blatant, provable lies, concentrating on rumor and innuendo with a few selected truths mixed in.  Freedom of speech grants this right to everyone.  You or I cannot take advantage except at home, but many make a living on innuendo, in the press, on TV, in books, in blogs, and interviews.

Having even a less burden are the business analysts.  They need only suggest directions, stocks, or trends.  They have alt-cover by another projecting and suggesting the exact opposite.  With the vagueness of market meanderings, anyone is potentially correct at least half the time.  Anyway, the business climate is so volatile, projections are soon forgotten, if they are believed in the first place.

Worst of all are the politicians, for whom gossip, rumor, and innuendo are mother’s milk.  For these folks, downright lies and deceit are the common fair.  Slander in small doses is even ok.  Low cal and fat free, their communications give meaning to old-fashioned demagoguery. Make a voter afraid or make the public cower is a recipe for success.  

With a bit of self-reflection, we arrive at the deep bottom.  The Blogger follows no rules of accuracy, truth, or whatever. Anything goes. The strongest requirement is slight, that of approximately 8th grade grammar.

The world of gossip, rumor, innuendo, suggestion, projection, and downright lies enjoys a large population with thousands possessing or applying for lucrative jobs. Why insist on knowing like the scientist, they ask, when you can do as well with mere hints?

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please Comment.

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Where is AI (Artificial Intelligence) Going?

  How to view Artificial Intelligence (AI).  Imagine you go to the store to buy a TV, but all they have are 1950s models, black and white, circular screens, picture rolls, and picture imperfect, no remote. You’d say no thanks. Back in the day, they sold wildly. The TV was a must-have for everyone with $250 to spend* (about $3000 today). Compared to where AI is today, this is more or less where TVs were 70 years ago. In only a few decades AI will be advanced beyond comprehension, just like TVs today are from the 50s viewpoint. Just like we could not imagine where the video concept was going back then, we cannot really imagine where AI is going. Buckle up. But it will be spectacular.    *Back then minimum wage was $0.75/hr. Thus, a TV cost more than eight weeks' wages. ------------------------- 
Post a Comment
Read more

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...
Post a Comment
Read more