Skip to main content

Congressional Types


Congressional Hearings
Have you watched Congressional (or Senate) hearings lately?  I have.  They're not pretty. Unlike only a few decades ago, most Congressional interrogators come armed only with talking points or staff generated questions.  The quality is usually poor; the delivery automatic; the responses are either submissive or arrogant. 
Television does not help the quality of the event, diminishing the findings mostly because it gives national exposure.
We offer several categories of questioners.  Most are dedicated to various forms of grandstanding, emotional displays, partisan attacks, and irrational utterances. All questioners are given only a few minutes to make points or make questions. They must be quick. Nimble? Forget that.
The List.
A. Pepper spray – Offering a barrage of questions giving little or no time for answers.
B. Passion fruit – I feel so intense about this injustice to the American people and want to make you accountable. You bad person, you.
C. Gotcha – Explain this horrible thing you’ve done. Unrelenting charges, often emotional.
D. Campaigner – To make a mini-speech for the home crowd. Usually prepared.
E. Analytical – To offer well reasoned questions to gain specific information on the topic at hand. (Rare)
F. New Tune – Use of time to make points about something completely off-tune from the current subject.
G. Cry baby – To appear to be so choked up over the issue that even tears issue forth. Halting speech is common.
H. Outrage – Usually this technique is applied to interrupt another questioner during their allotted time.
>>>What we haven’t seen YET is a variation of the “Occupy the Hearing” movement, where one party is so disruptive as to totally the shut down the business of the hearing. This is coming.<<<

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please Comment.

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Lemming Instinct

  In certain vital domains, a pervasive mediocrity among practitioners can stifle genuine advancement. When the intellectual output of a field is predominantly average, it inevitably produces research of corresponding quality. Nevertheless, some of these ideas, by sheer chance or perhaps through effective dissemination, will inevitably gain traction. A significant number of scholars and researchers will gravitate towards these trends, contributing to and propagating further work along these established lines. Such a trajectory allows an initially flawed concept to ascend to the status of mainstream orthodoxy. However, over an extended period, these prevailing ideas invariably fail to withstand rigorous scrutiny; they are ultimately and conclusively disproven. The disheartening pattern then reveals itself: rather than genuine progress, an equally unvalidated or incorrect idea often supplants the discredited one, swiftly establishing its own dominance. This cycle perpetuates, ensurin...
Post a Comment
Read more

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...
Post a Comment
Read more