Skip to main content

An Explanation Arrives - What To Do?


You hear an explanation of something almost everyday.  What do you do? 
First of all, you consider it mostly on the surface of the brain.  Some new input, as it were. Then comes the decision.  You can
  • Understand what was explained
  • Believe what was explained
  • Accept what was explained.


These three key words, understand, believe, and accept comprise a gross summary. But they typify three principles by which the brain or mind holds explanations. There are variations, exceptions, and exclusions. Just one is important now, and that is you may take the explanation as an example of several others in your mind, none of which have any of the attributes.  It sort of sits there awaiting further processing.

Before getting to the picayune details, note that understand, believe, and accept are mostly exclusive, meaning one does not imply the other.  For example, you may accept global warming into the future, but neither understand nor believe it.  Similarly, you may believe in God but not understand who this God might be. You may accept the nature of economic theory, supply-side or government managed, but neither believe nor understand it.   Another, currently challenging notion is that of abortion.  Many understand and accept the issues but don’t really believe any of them. As well, you may accept black holes but neither understand nor really believe they exist.

The notions evolve.  For example, if someone suggested, plate tectonics only a half-century ago, it may have been neither understood nor believed, but accepted provisionally as a hypothesis.  Now, with more information, it is widely accepted, understood, and believed.

Most desired is that all three concepts coalesce. Example. A ball falling from the table hits the ground.  You accept, believe, and mainly understand it,  But wait, to understand this, you need to understand gravity.  But who really understands gravity?  For many of us, understanding gravity is akin to a fish understanding water.  It’s there all around us.… Is this understanding?

When all three coalesce, we border on the absolute, and very difficult to achieve. Newton’s gravitational theories once had this status, but along came the quantum universe.

Not so clear are political, economic, religious, psychological, and many other explanations. They remain in a flux-state, with one of two of the three key words confirmed but the other(s) still open.

These three options are important to consider, at least personally, for whatever comes through the door. 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please Comment.

Popular posts from this blog

UNCERTAINTY IS CERTAIN

  Uncertainty is Certain G. Donald Allen 12/12/2024 1.       Introduction . This short essay is about uncertainty in people from both secular and nonsecular viewpoints. One point that will emerge is that randomly based uncertainty can be a driver for religious structure. Many groups facing uncertainty about their future are deeply religious or rely on faith as a source of comfort, resilience, and guidance. The intersection of uncertainty and religiosity often stems from the human need to find meaning, hope, and stability in the face of unpredictable or challenging circumstances. We first take up the connections of uncertainty to religion for the first real profession, farming, noting that hunting has many similar uncertainties. Below are groups that commonly lean on religious beliefs amidst uncertainty.   This short essay is a follow-up to a previous piece on certainty (https://used-ideas.blogspot.com/2024/12/certainty-is-also-emotion.html). U...
Post a Comment
Read more

Where is AI (Artificial Intelligence) Going?

  How to view Artificial Intelligence (AI).  Imagine you go to the store to buy a TV, but all they have are 1950s models, black and white, circular screens, picture rolls, and picture imperfect, no remote. You’d say no thanks. Back in the day, they sold wildly. The TV was a must-have for everyone with $250 to spend* (about $3000 today). Compared to where AI is today, this is more or less where TVs were 70 years ago. In only a few decades AI will be advanced beyond comprehension, just like TVs today are from the 50s viewpoint. Just like we could not imagine where the video concept was going back then, we cannot really imagine where AI is going. Buckle up. But it will be spectacular.    *Back then minimum wage was $0.75/hr. Thus, a TV cost more than eight weeks' wages. ------------------------- 
Post a Comment
Read more

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...
Post a Comment
Read more