Skip to main content

An Explanation Arrives - What To Do?


You hear an explanation of something almost everyday.  What do you do? 
First of all, you consider it mostly on the surface of the brain.  Some new input, as it were. Then comes the decision.  You can
  • Understand what was explained
  • Believe what was explained
  • Accept what was explained.


These three key words, understand, believe, and accept comprise a gross summary. But they typify three principles by which the brain or mind holds explanations. There are variations, exceptions, and exclusions. Just one is important now, and that is you may take the explanation as an example of several others in your mind, none of which have any of the attributes.  It sort of sits there awaiting further processing.

Before getting to the picayune details, note that understand, believe, and accept are mostly exclusive, meaning one does not imply the other.  For example, you may accept global warming into the future, but neither understand nor believe it.  Similarly, you may believe in God but not understand who this God might be. You may accept the nature of economic theory, supply-side or government managed, but neither believe nor understand it.   Another, currently challenging notion is that of abortion.  Many understand and accept the issues but don’t really believe any of them. As well, you may accept black holes but neither understand nor really believe they exist.

The notions evolve.  For example, if someone suggested, plate tectonics only a half-century ago, it may have been neither understood nor believed, but accepted provisionally as a hypothesis.  Now, with more information, it is widely accepted, understood, and believed.

Most desired is that all three concepts coalesce. Example. A ball falling from the table hits the ground.  You accept, believe, and mainly understand it,  But wait, to understand this, you need to understand gravity.  But who really understands gravity?  For many of us, understanding gravity is akin to a fish understanding water.  It’s there all around us.… Is this understanding?

When all three coalesce, we border on the absolute, and very difficult to achieve. Newton’s gravitational theories once had this status, but along came the quantum universe.

Not so clear are political, economic, religious, psychological, and many other explanations. They remain in a flux-state, with one of two of the three key words confirmed but the other(s) still open.

These three options are important to consider, at least personally, for whatever comes through the door. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Accepting Fake Information

Every day, we are all bombarded with information, especially on news channels.  One group claims it's false; another calls it the truth. How can we know when to accept it or alternatively how can we know it's false? There are several factors which influence acceptance of fake or false information. Here are the big four.  Some just don’t have the knowledge to discern fact/truth from fiction/fact/false*. Some fake information is cleverly disguised and simply appears to be correct. Some fake information is accepted because the person wants to believe it. Some fake information is accepted because there is no other information to the contrary. However, the acceptance of  information  of any kind become a kind of  truth , and this is a well studied topic. In the link below is an essay on “The Truth About Truth.” This shows simply that what is your point of view, different types of information are generally accepted, fake or not.   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/g-donald-allen-420b03

Your Brain Within Your Brain

  Your Bicameral Brain by Don Allen Have you ever gone to another room to get something, but when you got there you forgot what you were after? Have you ever experienced a flash of insight, but when you went to look it up online, you couldn’t even remember the keyword? You think you forgot it completely. How can it happen so fast? You worry your memory is failing. Are you merely absent-minded? You try to be amused. But maybe you didn’t forget.   Just maybe that flash of insight, clear and present for an instant, was never given in the verbal form, but another type of intelligence you possess, that you use, and that communicates only to you. We are trained to live in a verbal world, where words matter most. Aside from emotions, we are unable to conjure up other, nonverbal, forms of intelligence we primitively, pre-verbally, possess but don’t know how to use. Alas, we live in a world of words, stewing in the alphabet, sleeping under pages of paragraphs, almost ignoring one of

Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious?

  Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious? I truly like the study of consciousness, though it is safe to say no one really knows what it is. Some philosophers has avoided the problem by claiming consciousness simply doesn’t exist. It's the ultimate escape clause. However, the "therefore, it does not exist" argument also applies to "truth", "God", and even "reality" all quite beyond a consensus description for at least three millennia. For each issue or problem defying description or understanding, simply escape the problem by claiming it doesn’t exist. Problem solved or problem avoided? Alternately, as Daniel Dennett explains consciousness as an account of the various calculations occurring in the brain at close to the same time. However, he goes on to say that consciousness is so insignificant, especially compared to our exalted notions of it, that it might as well not exist [1] . Oh, well. Getting back to consciousness, most of us have view