Skip to main content

An Explanation Arrives - What To Do?


You hear an explanation of something almost everyday.  What do you do? 
First of all, you consider it mostly on the surface of the brain.  Some new input, as it were. Then comes the decision.  You can
  • Understand what was explained
  • Believe what was explained
  • Accept what was explained.


These three key words, understand, believe, and accept comprise a gross summary. But they typify three principles by which the brain or mind holds explanations. There are variations, exceptions, and exclusions. Just one is important now, and that is you may take the explanation as an example of several others in your mind, none of which have any of the attributes.  It sort of sits there awaiting further processing.

Before getting to the picayune details, note that understand, believe, and accept are mostly exclusive, meaning one does not imply the other.  For example, you may accept global warming into the future, but neither understand nor believe it.  Similarly, you may believe in God but not understand who this God might be. You may accept the nature of economic theory, supply-side or government managed, but neither believe nor understand it.   Another, currently challenging notion is that of abortion.  Many understand and accept the issues but don’t really believe any of them. As well, you may accept black holes but neither understand nor really believe they exist.

The notions evolve.  For example, if someone suggested, plate tectonics only a half-century ago, it may have been neither understood nor believed, but accepted provisionally as a hypothesis.  Now, with more information, it is widely accepted, understood, and believed.

Most desired is that all three concepts coalesce. Example. A ball falling from the table hits the ground.  You accept, believe, and mainly understand it,  But wait, to understand this, you need to understand gravity.  But who really understands gravity?  For many of us, understanding gravity is akin to a fish understanding water.  It’s there all around us.… Is this understanding?

When all three coalesce, we border on the absolute, and very difficult to achieve. Newton’s gravitational theories once had this status, but along came the quantum universe.

Not so clear are political, economic, religious, psychological, and many other explanations. They remain in a flux-state, with one of two of the three key words confirmed but the other(s) still open.

These three options are important to consider, at least personally, for whatever comes through the door. 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please Comment.

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Lemming Instinct

  In certain vital domains, a pervasive mediocrity among practitioners can stifle genuine advancement. When the intellectual output of a field is predominantly average, it inevitably produces research of corresponding quality. Nevertheless, some of these ideas, by sheer chance or perhaps through effective dissemination, will inevitably gain traction. A significant number of scholars and researchers will gravitate towards these trends, contributing to and propagating further work along these established lines. Such a trajectory allows an initially flawed concept to ascend to the status of mainstream orthodoxy. However, over an extended period, these prevailing ideas invariably fail to withstand rigorous scrutiny; they are ultimately and conclusively disproven. The disheartening pattern then reveals itself: rather than genuine progress, an equally unvalidated or incorrect idea often supplants the discredited one, swiftly establishing its own dominance. This cycle perpetuates, ensurin...
Post a Comment
Read more

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...
Post a Comment
Read more