Skip to main content

The Political Scam

To friends of course, and to foes where ever....

I have given to political parties in the past.  The downside of so doing is that the parties then have your contact points and contact they do, over and over and over again.  Also, these become part of the public record, accessible to all.   This last point is my issue today.  The party is irrelevant.

Let me list a few observations.
  • I get frequent follow-up emails, sometimes a dozen per day from various named or unnamed senders.  This morning one identified himself as Bob.  That’s it.
  • I get several phone calls every week asking for contributions.
  • I often get multiple mailings from congressional candidates looking for contributions.

This goes on and on, day in and day out, weekly, monthly, and so on.  OK, these folks want money.  That is my value to them.  But where is the scam?

Finally, my point.  Two days ago I got a phone call from a friendly fellow supporting the governor, and asking for money.  Just a hundred was the first suggestion.  I said no.  Down went the suggestion until finally I agreed to $20, usually my max. That’s when it happened.  He wanted a credit card number.  I said no way was I going to give a credit card over the phone.  Send me an invoice by mail. He did not want this.  He persisted. (Actuially, when you agree to contribute they usually send you off to some boss for verification.  But NOT in this case.)  I insisted no credit card number.  No invoice, no deal!  Continue asking and I’ll hang up, I told him. He persisted on the credit card.  I said no deal. He insisted. I hung up.

What’s the matter here?  Answer. I was being scammed by someone or some group, I don’t know which. Tho opposing party, some general scammers???  My advice is not to give a credit card number over the phone to anyone or group you cannot verify!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Human Simulation is Possible - by Humans

  Human Simulation: Agent-Based Modeling and the Computational Case for Our Reality   1.       Introduction In the essay, we introduce the notion that humanity could be a deliberate simulation based on an extremely simple single-celled organism, hardly anything more complex than that. This will allow an (apparently) new interpretation of the notion that humanity is simulated, but that there is no master engineer at a massive number of dials and switches, responsible for every twist and turn of our universe and lives. We begin with the notion that the universe exists and operates under its own laws. So, given the Earth [2] , when and where life first began, it was infused with a living agent, self-actualized, reproductive, and with other basic rules for its operations, interactions, and much of what single-celled organisms do today. The idea from this occurred some years back when writing code in ActionScript (formerly Flash), I was able to create...

The Calculus of Ideas and Patterns

  Introduction. When dealing with ideas, patterns, intuition, and brainstorming, we need operations or rules not unlike those of arithmetic. The goal is not proof, a finished device, or a fait accompli , but rather a foundation for further investigation and study. In some cases, these operations may yield a proposition, that is, something capable of being proved. In this sense, they form a practical logic of intuition. The article concludes with a few select examples from a variety of venues. Setting. We are working with a given idea, problem, or project, or simply just thinking. Our aim is to discover pathways, patterns, or conceptual connections that may be useful. The following operations describe ways in which ideas and patterns can be generated, transformed, or refined. These also work toward understanding the imagination. Yet, this framework is distinguished from formal logic and proof. We are tempted to call them as “soft logic” because while nothing is proved, reasons...

Freedom of Speech

  Think of freedom of speech as a living organism. Then think of what is required for it to survive. Coming to mind are a population agreeable to its constitution (its environment) and the institutions (its nutrients) that keep it healthy. Currently, many institutions, including some political parties, question unfettered freedom of speech and are working to deny it, claiming it is unhealthy for the body politic. Yes? No?