The extensible spring. Think of the shock absorber on your car. You hit a bump, the spring is compressed and
then releases its energy slowly to cushion the bump.
Now think of capital
markets in the same way. This time the
bump is a constant barrage of regulations.
They kept coming during the Obama administration. For good or bad, the spring kept
compressing. Under Trump, the regulations
have been relaxed, and the spring with all its stored up energy seems to be
releasing its energy in an explosion of expansion. This leads us to believe the markets have
expanded (30 new DOW records this year), not back to their reasonable
expression, but far beyond. It leads one
to think a rebound is possible, as it returns to where it should be.
And “should be,” on
the basis of growth and market, are the key words. We are led to believe the markets will settle
back to reasonable positions, and this may imply a correction is coming. A bumpy ride may be afoot.
Analogy is a wonderful
method to explain. Be aware of analogic
imperfections.
A final point rears its
unsmiling face. Both presidents, seeming
to live by executive action, can die by the same. What if, in the next cycle, the Dems come
back? It might well happen. Then, all those relaxed regulations could be
reinstated. It might well happen. Back go the
markets. This creates something
of an unstable condition in the markets.
As well, it expresses confusion and therefore instability about
investment. No matter who you support, this cannot be good. Instability is usually bad – unless you think
it controllable. Not wise think. Ping-pong, ping-pong.
Cycle-by-cycle, we
could endure regulation, repeal and back again. You want this?
I hate to say it but
Congress has devolved into a jumble of opinion minions, each staking out “moral”
or “ethical” positions, which allows them to do little, requiring the President
to make decisions they should have compromised upon to create law.
Comments
Post a Comment
Please Comment.