Skip to main content

Random Thoughts - 9

Ways we learn.
You want to learn?  You want to achieve?  You want to know?  Go to school, say the educators.  But there are other important ways to learn.

  •       First, we learn from reading books or being taught in the classroom. We learn by solving given problems. Practice and repetition, this is the role and scope of all school teaching. Occasionally, inspiration occurs.   
  •       Second we learn from examples and experience. Seeing many examples, some working and some not, and knowing why helps. These build our knowledge and intuition of reality.  Knowledge is a pathway to solving problems, while intuition provides a pathway to innovation.  More simply, we learn by doing.  Attending the school of hard knocks is an expression of this. 
  •       Third, we learn from mistakes*.  Make no mistake about it; this is a key way we learn.  How many times have you and I learned this or that of what *not* to do, or what doesn’t work.  However, this is the latest in actual academic research**.   An utterly remarkable finding, since everyone who’s done something or anything already knows it. So much for academic adventures.  Some actually do advance knowledge; some merely confirm what we know.
  •       Fourth, we learn from success, though sometimes it leads to a sense of unwarranted and unmitigated confidence. Success has several faces, not all good.  One is the super-inflated ego, but more subtle, one can lead us down pathways from which personal recovery may be difficult if not impossible. Success can also lead us to believe we can do things beyond our scope.  

Learning involves a complex of factors not all understood. Indeed, in any situation where there are multiple factors, understanding and learning is more difficult.  This clearly differentiates issues between the human and analytical sciences.

*But there is a caveat.  If one believes in what the outcome should be, the mistake revealed is ignored.  This is an example of the post-truth syndrome, wherein our emotional response contravenes recognition of the actual evidence observed.
**Janet, Metcalfe, Learning from Errors, Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 68:465-489 (Volume publication date January 2017) First published online as a Review in Advance on September 14, 2016 g/10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-

Definitions.

Affordable:  When used by a politician the term means “more expensive” than you want.   Ask the question, “Affordable?  By whom?” 

Hyperloop: a deep tunnel bored into the earth through which very high speed trains can travel. The hyperloop is promoted with hyperhype by hypertypes, who will have to solve hyperproblems to make their hyperprofits, the true and hypergoal.

FPG: (Frequent Political Guest) a term applied to Congressmen who love to appear on various news channels. Armed with talking points, they drone on, usually offering nothing new and usually against something.  Good copy, as they say.


B.S.: the intials of Bernie Sanders, the icon of any non military project, provided the government spends more doing it.   

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

The Lemming Instinct

  In certain vital domains, a pervasive mediocrity among practitioners can stifle genuine advancement. When the intellectual output of a field is predominantly average, it inevitably produces research of corresponding quality. Nevertheless, some of these ideas, by sheer chance or perhaps through effective dissemination, will inevitably gain traction. A significant number of scholars and researchers will gravitate towards these trends, contributing to and propagating further work along these established lines. Such a trajectory allows an initially flawed concept to ascend to the status of mainstream orthodoxy. However, over an extended period, these prevailing ideas invariably fail to withstand rigorous scrutiny; they are ultimately and conclusively disproven. The disheartening pattern then reveals itself: rather than genuine progress, an equally unvalidated or incorrect idea often supplants the discredited one, swiftly establishing its own dominance. This cycle perpetuates, ensurin...

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...