“Why police reform is so hard?” This is the content of a essay from The
Conversation website (http://theconversation.com). It is akin to the old chestnut, “Are you still beating your wife?” The very statement assumes the conclusion. In the police case, the statement assumes the
police need reforming, and that it is not only difficult but nearly impossible.
Always, we see more training is the
prescription to correct these egregious offenses.
What has happened is that police now live on the
defensive. Pro-active policing is feared
by the probability of racist accusations. Crowd control is diminished by the
probability of being charged with brutality. Domestic disturbance interventions are
diminished by the possibility of excessive force charges. The perpetrators make their charges with the
simple goal of making their case tried in the press – usually against law
enforcement. The result is always that
more sensitivity training is needed.
Police, from the onset of any nonviolent or even semi-violent
movement, take a defensive stance, giving ground, backing down, and going
underground for many social demonstrations, domestic disputes, and downright
robberies. Tactics have changed. Chasing
violators pertaining to anything concerning race and social issues is
diminished. The focus now is upon traffic violations of all flavors. While this no doubt has merit, much could
substantially be monitored by far less expensive roadway technology.
Police commissioners, like school superintendents, live at
the vagaries and perceptions of the voters.
They obey.
The police have become traffic cops. Expect more speeding, tail-light out, smog
emissions, and other statute or code violations. Safety for them.
Comments
Post a Comment
Please Comment.