Skip to main content

No one owes you anything

At my high school (Pulaski) graduation in Milwaukee many years ago, the guest speaker was a local judge, Christ D. Seraphim.  Odd name I know – thought so even back then.  But one comment he made has served me well over the decades.  He instructed us with, “No one owes you anything.”  This advice, I know, is totally out of fashion now, but it served me well.

We now live in a world where many expect the government to give them opportunity, safety,  and success. It is also counter to the admonition that came just a few years later at the Presidential inauguration speech of John F. Kennedy, when he counseled us, “Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country.”  Widely quoted for years afterward, this resonant call is hardly heard anymore.



Conditions in the USA have changed fundamentally from an era of independence and self-reliance to one of dependence and safe-spaces, and yes, variations of self-styled utopias*. 

In fact, I do not feel I’m presently in a safe-space when the youth of this time demand safety be granted gratuitously and success be guaranteed without condition, both without the slightest comprehension of what makes  either of them even remotely possible.

We live in a time where rights dominate strife, where confusion between freedom and liberty is rampant, where constitutional amendments can be selected or rejected by choice, and where, by fiat, there is a correct manner of life – no exceptions.  


*Indeed, Plato, in his The Republic, created a theology that simply will not go away, that of a caretaker priesthood of governance. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Human Simulation is Possible - by Humans

  Human Simulation: Agent-Based Modeling and the Computational Case for Our Reality   1.       Introduction In the essay, we introduce the notion that humanity could be a deliberate simulation based on an extremely simple single-celled organism, hardly anything more complex than that. This will allow an (apparently) new interpretation of the notion that humanity is simulated, but that there is no master engineer at a massive number of dials and switches, responsible for every twist and turn of our universe and lives. We begin with the notion that the universe exists and operates under its own laws. So, given the Earth [2] , when and where life first began, it was infused with a living agent, self-actualized, reproductive, and with other basic rules for its operations, interactions, and much of what single-celled organisms do today. The idea from this occurred some years back when writing code in ActionScript (formerly Flash), I was able to create...

The Calculus of Ideas and Patterns

  Introduction. When dealing with ideas, patterns, intuition, and brainstorming, we need operations or rules not unlike those of arithmetic. The goal is not proof, a finished device, or a fait accompli , but rather a foundation for further investigation and study. In some cases, these operations may yield a proposition, that is, something capable of being proved. In this sense, they form a practical logic of intuition. The article concludes with a few select examples from a variety of venues. Setting. We are working with a given idea, problem, or project, or simply just thinking. Our aim is to discover pathways, patterns, or conceptual connections that may be useful. The following operations describe ways in which ideas and patterns can be generated, transformed, or refined. These also work toward understanding the imagination. Yet, this framework is distinguished from formal logic and proof. We are tempted to call them as “soft logic” because while nothing is proved, reasons...

Freedom of Speech

  Think of freedom of speech as a living organism. Then think of what is required for it to survive. Coming to mind are a population agreeable to its constitution (its environment) and the institutions (its nutrients) that keep it healthy. Currently, many institutions, including some political parties, question unfettered freedom of speech and are working to deny it, claiming it is unhealthy for the body politic. Yes? No?