Winning. Have you ever wondered
about just how many games must your team win to know, guaranteed, it has won a
certain number of consecutive games?
This is, not likely to have
won a certain number of consecutive games.
But actual consecutive wins. Thinking a bit
combinatorially we can determine this with a simple formula. Notation:
n
=
number of games in a season
r = number of consecutive wins desired
r = number of consecutive wins desired
Let n/r = m R k.
That is m is the integer
divisor of n by r, which is 0, 1, 2,…, and k
is the remainder, 0 ,1,…, r-1.
For example 53/5 = 10 R 3, or 21/6 = 3 R 3. Then we
have the minimum number of games that must be won to guarantee r consecutive wins W sometime during a season is given by
W
= m(r-1) + k + 1
In the table below, we give some examples for various
sports.Of course, when r = 2, that value is the next highest number greater than half the number of games when n is even.
Number of games played
|
Run of consecutive
wins
|
Minimum wins needed
|
Winning percentage
|
Sport
|
160
|
2
|
81
|
50.6%
|
Baseball
|
80
|
2
|
41
|
51.3%
|
Basketball
|
38
|
2
|
20
|
52.6%
|
Soccer*
|
16
|
2
|
9
|
56.3%
|
Football (American)
|
160
|
3
|
108
|
67.5%
|
Baseball
|
80
|
3
|
55
|
68.8%
|
Basketball
|
38
|
3
|
27
|
71.1%
|
Soccer*
|
16
|
3
|
12
|
75.0%
|
Football (American)
|
160
|
4
|
121
|
75.6%
|
Baseball
|
80
|
4
|
61
|
76.3%
|
Basketball
|
38
|
4
|
30
|
78.9%
|
Soccer*
|
16
|
4
|
13
|
81.3%
|
Football (American)
|
160
|
5
|
129
|
80.6%
|
Baseball
|
80
|
5
|
65
|
81.3%
|
Basketball
|
38
|
5
|
32
|
84.2%
|
Soccer*
|
16
|
5
|
14
|
87.5%
|
Football (American)
|
* A win is exactly that; tie counts as a
non-win
|
Now to solve the same problem over two seasons or more
you merely select twice the season length.
Thus, while to win five consecutive wins over two seasons of 80 games
each, take n to be 160, which gives the
requirement to 129 wins. There is a slight possibility that a team could win
the last three games of one season and the first two of the next season to get
to five. This forces the win requirement
to be slightly smaller than double the previous value.
P.S. Thanks to John A. for reviewing the problem for clarity
Comments
Post a Comment
Please Comment.