Skip to main content

Winning

Winning.  Have you ever wondered about just how many games must your team win to know, guaranteed, it has won a certain number of consecutive games?  This is, not likely to have won a certain number of consecutive games.  But actual consecutive wins.  Thinking a bit combinatorially we can determine this with a simple formula.  Notation:

n = number of games in a season
r = number of consecutive wins desired

Let n/r = m R k.  That is m is the integer divisor of n by r, which is 0, 1, 2,…, and k is the remainder, 0 ,1,…,  r-1. 

For example 53/5 = 10 R 3, or 21/6 = 3 R 3. Then we have the minimum number of games that must be won to guarantee r consecutive wins W sometime during a season is given by

W = m(r-1) + k + 1

In the table below, we give some examples for various sports.Of course, when r = 2, that value is the next highest number greater than half the number of games when n is even.  
Number of games played
Run of consecutive wins
Minimum wins needed
Winning percentage
Sport
160
2
81
50.6%
Baseball
80
2
41
51.3%
Basketball
38
2
20
52.6%
Soccer*
16
2
9
56.3%
Football (American)
160
3
108
67.5%
Baseball
80
3
55
68.8%
Basketball
38
3
27
71.1%
Soccer*
16
3
12
75.0%
Football (American)
160
4
121
75.6%
Baseball
80
4
61
76.3%
Basketball
38
4
30
78.9%
Soccer*
16
4
13
81.3%
Football (American)
160
5
129
80.6%
Baseball
80
5
65
81.3%
Basketball
38
5
32
84.2%
Soccer*
16
5
14
87.5%
Football (American)
* A win is exactly that; tie counts as a non-win


Now to solve the same problem over two seasons or more you merely select twice the season length.  Thus, while to win five consecutive wins over two seasons of 80 games each, take n to be 160, which gives the requirement to 129 wins. There is a slight possibility that a team could win the last three games of one season and the first two of the next season to get to five.  This forces the win requirement to be slightly smaller than double the previous value. 

The required number of wins is perhaps higher than you thought, but it is the guarantee that drives it upwards.  Treating this problem probabilistically is rather different. 

 P.S. Thanks to John A. for reviewing the problem for clarity
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please Comment.

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Lemming Instinct

  In certain vital domains, a pervasive mediocrity among practitioners can stifle genuine advancement. When the intellectual output of a field is predominantly average, it inevitably produces research of corresponding quality. Nevertheless, some of these ideas, by sheer chance or perhaps through effective dissemination, will inevitably gain traction. A significant number of scholars and researchers will gravitate towards these trends, contributing to and propagating further work along these established lines. Such a trajectory allows an initially flawed concept to ascend to the status of mainstream orthodoxy. However, over an extended period, these prevailing ideas invariably fail to withstand rigorous scrutiny; they are ultimately and conclusively disproven. The disheartening pattern then reveals itself: rather than genuine progress, an equally unvalidated or incorrect idea often supplants the discredited one, swiftly establishing its own dominance. This cycle perpetuates, ensurin...
Post a Comment
Read more

THE ORIGINS OF IMPOSSIBLE PROBLEMS

The Origins of Impossible Problems Introduction. Impossible problems have always been a part of the landscape of human thought. They arise from various sources, often rooted in cognitive, logical, or structural limitations. Some problems are truly unsolvable due to fundamental constraints, while others only appear impossible because of human limitations in understanding, reasoning, or approach. In many situations, we make difficult problems impossible because of our limitations, psychological and otherwise. It is a curious thought problem to consider what sort of limitations AI will reveal when we give it truly difficult problems to solve. We must hope that we humans have not transferred our complete reliance and dependence to machine-learning tools beforehand. Below are key sources of seemingly impossible problems, along with examples and a few references to philosophical and scientific thought. Impossible Problems . To explore impossible problems, we must consider our systems fo...
Post a Comment
Read more