Skip to main content

Corruption World-Wide

Corruption.  Everything is measured these days.  It has been said if it cannot be measured, it doesn’t exist. So, even corruption has been measured.  While there is no real method to measure actual corruption, it is measured indirectly by perceptions of residents.  So, we go transparent, that is to the transparency website to examine corruption*.  

A total of 176 countries were evaluated.  The lower ranked countries have the lowest scores (based on a 0-100 score). They are by plagued by untrustworthy and badly functioning public institutions like the police and judiciary.  This includes bribery and extortion. Higher-ranked countries tend to have more freedom of the press, public access to information about public expenditure, higher standards of integrity for officials, and generally independent judicial systems.  

Below, we show the bottom or most corrupt countries (Table 1) followed by the top or least corrupt countries (Table 2).

Table 1. Most corrupt countries

Country CPI2016 Score Rank Population (2015)
Somalia 10 176 10,787,104
South Sudan 11 175 12,339,812
Korea (North) 12 174 25,155,317
Syria 13 173 18,502,413
Libya 14 170 6,278,438
Yemen 14 170 26,832,215
Sudan 14 170 40,234,882
Afghanistan 15 169 32,526,562
Guinea-Bissau 16 168 1,844,325
Venezuela 17 166 31,108,083
Iraq 17 166 36,423,395

This makes Somalia as the most corrupt country on earth.  Only one of these countries is in the Americas, Venezuela. The second worst such country is Haiti, with a score of 20.

Table 2. Least corrupt countries

Country CPI2016 Score Rank Population (2015)
New Zealand 90 1 4,595,700
Denmark 90 1 5,676,002
Finland 89 3 5,482,013
Sweden 88 4 9,798,871
Switzerland 86 5 8,286,976
Norway 85 6 5,195,921
Singapore 84 7 5,535,002
Netherlands 83 8 16,936,520
Canada 82 9 35,851,774
Germany 81 10 81,413,145
Luxembourg 81 10 569,676
United Kingdom 81 10 65,138,232

Of these thirteen countries, ten are in Western Europe.  But where is the USA?  It has a score of 74 and is ranked 18th worldwide.   I suppose that a part of the score is overall perception by residents.  For example, in the USA, there is an undertow of dissatisfaction by many.  This reduces the overall score. 

There is little overall correlation of corruption with population, but the average score (lowest average rank) for Western Europe far exceeds the  next (least) corrupt region, the Americas.  Third least corrupt of the regions are the countries of the Asian Pacific.  The most corrupt region is sub Saharan Africa.

Have a favorite country?  Go to the website below.  Check it out.


* http://www.transparency.org/news/feature/corruption_perceptions_index_2016#regional
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please Comment.

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Lemming Instinct

  In certain vital domains, a pervasive mediocrity among practitioners can stifle genuine advancement. When the intellectual output of a field is predominantly average, it inevitably produces research of corresponding quality. Nevertheless, some of these ideas, by sheer chance or perhaps through effective dissemination, will inevitably gain traction. A significant number of scholars and researchers will gravitate towards these trends, contributing to and propagating further work along these established lines. Such a trajectory allows an initially flawed concept to ascend to the status of mainstream orthodoxy. However, over an extended period, these prevailing ideas invariably fail to withstand rigorous scrutiny; they are ultimately and conclusively disproven. The disheartening pattern then reveals itself: rather than genuine progress, an equally unvalidated or incorrect idea often supplants the discredited one, swiftly establishing its own dominance. This cycle perpetuates, ensurin...
Post a Comment
Read more

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...
Post a Comment
Read more