Skip to main content

Send in the Clowns



Is sugar addictive?  Since it was cultivated in the Americas a couple of centuries ago, it has become a staple throughout the world.  People love it.  While sugar effects are so benign and the craving is so universal, it has not been determined to be addictive or not.  (See, the wonderful book, 1493, by Charles C. Mann.) A good case can be made for addiction, but the chemistry is subtle.  Well, sugar does add calories, and our wonderful legislatures wish to do something about apparent consequent obesity.  For most legislatures, doing something must involve money in some way, giving it out or taking it in.  The latter is preferred. The solution this new year in Philadelphia is a sugar tax on sugary soft drinks at the rate of 1.5 cents per ounce**.  For example, the tax on a 42-ounce big gulp will be 63 cents, and for a gallon of sweetened tea, it will be $1.92.   Alcohol is excluded, as are orange, tomato and apple juices – the healthy stuff I guess.  Fans of energy drinks such as Red Bull will also be awarded a tax.  However, there seems no tax on candy bars, ice cream, and honey buns.  So, for many, the new normal will now be two candy bars and a diet coke.  Yummy. 

Let’s follow the logic. The next law to be passed by these clowns will be to legalize heroin and then place a whopping tax on its use – thereby reducing addiction and consumption. :)

**https://billypenn.com/2017/01/03/philly-soda-tax-the-big-list-of-drinks-that-are-and-arent-taxed/

_________________
2017 brings new laws about cell phones.  It is now against the law in some states  even to hold a cell phone while driving*. We know cell phones and particularly texting are distracting and thereby disastrous to on-road safety. It appears finally, our governments are doing something practical.  This is not right-speak or right-think, a preferred target. This is actually something like an achievement.  Yet, a few contradictions obtain.  However, what remains is that in any car two friends, enemies or four can carry on a loud conversation, which can be totally distracting.  Ditto, double ditto, for playing sounds (aka music) at  such a volume you can hear it in your car while their car passes you all too quickly. This is particularly true for younger drivers, as their brain’s wonderful capacity of neuroplasticity has not adjusted to maintain a sense of safety regardless.  Adults have learned after many years to maintain this sense. But when adults are texting they are in the same situation as the younger drivers.  They lose track; they make big mistakes; lives are lost.

*http://www.abc10.com/news/local/california/the-low-down-on-californias-newest-cell-phone-law/327561414
-----------------------------------------------


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Accepting Fake Information

Every day, we are all bombarded with information, especially on news channels.  One group claims it's false; another calls it the truth. How can we know when to accept it or alternatively how can we know it's false? There are several factors which influence acceptance of fake or false information. Here are the big four.  Some just don’t have the knowledge to discern fact/truth from fiction/fact/false*. Some fake information is cleverly disguised and simply appears to be correct. Some fake information is accepted because the person wants to believe it. Some fake information is accepted because there is no other information to the contrary. However, the acceptance of  information  of any kind become a kind of  truth , and this is a well studied topic. In the link below is an essay on “The Truth About Truth.” This shows simply that what is your point of view, different types of information are generally accepted, fake or not.   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/g-donald-allen-420b03

Your Brain Within Your Brain

  Your Bicameral Brain by Don Allen Have you ever gone to another room to get something, but when you got there you forgot what you were after? Have you ever experienced a flash of insight, but when you went to look it up online, you couldn’t even remember the keyword? You think you forgot it completely. How can it happen so fast? You worry your memory is failing. Are you merely absent-minded? You try to be amused. But maybe you didn’t forget.   Just maybe that flash of insight, clear and present for an instant, was never given in the verbal form, but another type of intelligence you possess, that you use, and that communicates only to you. We are trained to live in a verbal world, where words matter most. Aside from emotions, we are unable to conjure up other, nonverbal, forms of intelligence we primitively, pre-verbally, possess but don’t know how to use. Alas, we live in a world of words, stewing in the alphabet, sleeping under pages of paragraphs, almost ignoring one of

Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious?

  Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious? I truly like the study of consciousness, though it is safe to say no one really knows what it is. Some philosophers has avoided the problem by claiming consciousness simply doesn’t exist. It's the ultimate escape clause. However, the "therefore, it does not exist" argument also applies to "truth", "God", and even "reality" all quite beyond a consensus description for at least three millennia. For each issue or problem defying description or understanding, simply escape the problem by claiming it doesn’t exist. Problem solved or problem avoided? Alternately, as Daniel Dennett explains consciousness as an account of the various calculations occurring in the brain at close to the same time. However, he goes on to say that consciousness is so insignificant, especially compared to our exalted notions of it, that it might as well not exist [1] . Oh, well. Getting back to consciousness, most of us have view