Skip to main content

Fraud, Sickness, and Trump



A.    Fraud:  Beware, my friend, of anyone or any party that proposes to pay for any government program by eliminating fraud.  The fundamental problem with this claim is simply that the amount of fraud, how it is done, and to what fiscal extent are largely unknown – admittedly so by the feds.  Only special cases are understood.  Specifically, all flavors of federal medical care should be singled out.  Some estimate it amounts to $60,000,000,000/year.  Fraud is amazingly difficult uncover, to prosecute, and then to prove.  Even organized crime has recognized it as an income source far less dangerous or risky than traditional venues. Miami, for example, is considered the Medicare fraud center of America, with New York a close second. Fraud in the defense industry, largely through cost overruns, has been rampant for decades, but what has been done?  Give just one example?
B.    Sickness to continue:
·       Democrats: Repealing Obamacare will "make America sick again."
·       Republicans: Keeping Obamacare "makes Americans sick."  And broke!

Looks like at least half of us will be sick, one way or the other,
with the remaining disgusted by government ineptitude.

C.    On Trump. For vastly different reasons…

·       Democrats fear most of all a Trump success.
·       Republicans fear the same.
Trump has changed the rules, and neither side understands what’s happening, much less what to do about it. The pollsters have been sent to the woodshed; the pundits keep playing their old tunes; the academics, as usual, are clueless; our foreign opponents are shivering; the business people are hopeful; and the citizens are praying.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Human Simulation is Possible - by Humans

  Human Simulation: Agent-Based Modeling and the Computational Case for Our Reality   1.       Introduction In the essay, we introduce the notion that humanity could be a deliberate simulation based on an extremely simple single-celled organism, hardly anything more complex than that. This will allow an (apparently) new interpretation of the notion that humanity is simulated, but that there is no master engineer at a massive number of dials and switches, responsible for every twist and turn of our universe and lives. We begin with the notion that the universe exists and operates under its own laws. So, given the Earth [2] , when and where life first began, it was infused with a living agent, self-actualized, reproductive, and with other basic rules for its operations, interactions, and much of what single-celled organisms do today. The idea from this occurred some years back when writing code in ActionScript (formerly Flash), I was able to create...

The Calculus of Ideas and Patterns

  Introduction. When dealing with ideas, patterns, intuition, and brainstorming, we need operations or rules not unlike those of arithmetic. The goal is not proof, a finished device, or a fait accompli , but rather a foundation for further investigation and study. In some cases, these operations may yield a proposition, that is, something capable of being proved. In this sense, they form a practical logic of intuition. The article concludes with a few select examples from a variety of venues. Setting. We are working with a given idea, problem, or project, or simply just thinking. Our aim is to discover pathways, patterns, or conceptual connections that may be useful. The following operations describe ways in which ideas and patterns can be generated, transformed, or refined. These also work toward understanding the imagination. Yet, this framework is distinguished from formal logic and proof. We are tempted to call them as “soft logic” because while nothing is proved, reasons...

Freedom of Speech

  Think of freedom of speech as a living organism. Then think of what is required for it to survive. Coming to mind are a population agreeable to its constitution (its environment) and the institutions (its nutrients) that keep it healthy. Currently, many institutions, including some political parties, question unfettered freedom of speech and are working to deny it, claiming it is unhealthy for the body politic. Yes? No?