Skip to main content

Trump jawboning with Carrier

Trump's first jawboning session.  Carrier vs. Trump
Lots of folks have objected to the $7,000,000 tax break given to Carrier over a ten year period for retaining their Indiana manufacturing operations that were scheduled to migrate to Mexico.  Part of Trump's presidential campaign was to keep American jobs in America.  This is origin of the conflict.  However, ...
No one has observed that if all 1,100 are unemployed in the state of Indiana, the cost to the government for unemployment benefits  would be
1,100 people x 26 weeks x $390/week* = $ 11,154,000

for the first 26 weeks of unemployment.  After that comes welfare, medicaid and more. Serious reduced spending by affected families would be a certainty.  Loss of home and loss of spending power would follow. The total loss is far higher.  Careers are lost, and with them the infrastructure supporting them. 
The mere $7,000,000 cost to taxpayers exceeds the entire tax break in just one-half year!  For a brief phone call more than $4,000,000 was saved to the government.  As well, the price paid for the machines continuing to be manufactured in the US stays in the US. Not being an economist, I cannot give full and accurate measure to the total balance of economics.  It seems there is a quite net gain for the homeland.
*See http://fileunemployment.org/unemployment-benefits-comparison-by-state
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please Comment.

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Lemming Instinct

  In certain vital domains, a pervasive mediocrity among practitioners can stifle genuine advancement. When the intellectual output of a field is predominantly average, it inevitably produces research of corresponding quality. Nevertheless, some of these ideas, by sheer chance or perhaps through effective dissemination, will inevitably gain traction. A significant number of scholars and researchers will gravitate towards these trends, contributing to and propagating further work along these established lines. Such a trajectory allows an initially flawed concept to ascend to the status of mainstream orthodoxy. However, over an extended period, these prevailing ideas invariably fail to withstand rigorous scrutiny; they are ultimately and conclusively disproven. The disheartening pattern then reveals itself: rather than genuine progress, an equally unvalidated or incorrect idea often supplants the discredited one, swiftly establishing its own dominance. This cycle perpetuates, ensurin...
Post a Comment
Read more