Skip to main content

The sandbox, tank, swamp



Metaphors for our day: Sandbox, Tank, Swamp. 

Think outside the sandbox, they say.  There is nothing more true than with the Republicans.  Indeed, for the Republicans there is a new sandbox of populism.  It is a genuine caring for, not assuming of, the people.  Trump, much to the chagrin of the traditional Republicans, has changed the sandbox in which they should be playing.  For Republicans, gone are the days of trying to relive the era of Ronald Reagan. What has evolved is a new party.

A tectonic shift of both parties has taken place.  The New Republican message is populism.  It places Americans first, with their aspirations, dreams, and hopes.

Yet, the Democrat sandbox has changed as well.  The New Democrats are now a party appealing to the very rich and supported by the poor.  The former gets the benefits; the latter gets the promises.
The big switch: The New Democrats are now a party of big money. The New Republicans are now a party of the people. In contrast, Bernie Sanders also offered a party for the people.  He was crushed under the treads of big money.

It is true, the “Sandbox” is a benign term.  Its imagery is just a place to play and have fun.  The more ominous term is “The Tank.”  The tank is not a good place to be.  Once there, you are assumed, bagged, tagged, and then ignored.  When there, what you believe is taken, and then you are forsaken.  The poor is there, the press is there, and the immigrants are there.  The diehards of both parties are there.  Remarkably, the unions were there but now are not.  Nor are evangelicals. Nor are suburbanites. Nor are business people.

The tank is not unlike a well for the owner to drink without compensation, without thanks, and without reward.  The tank is a place where occupants are used and reused – and assumed to stay there. No deviations allowed.  More promises or the pillory are given as the Rx to would be defectors.

A third term, “The Swamp,” images another undesirable place.  It portends a place dominated by alligators, snakes, leeches, and bacteria all quite willing to gobble up, consume, and reduce all inside to quivering, obedient occupants.  Avoid the gators and succumb to another form.  Resistance is impossible.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please Comment.

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Where is AI (Artificial Intelligence) Going?

  How to view Artificial Intelligence (AI).  Imagine you go to the store to buy a TV, but all they have are 1950s models, black and white, circular screens, picture rolls, and picture imperfect, no remote. You’d say no thanks. Back in the day, they sold wildly. The TV was a must-have for everyone with $250 to spend* (about $3000 today). Compared to where AI is today, this is more or less where TVs were 70 years ago. In only a few decades AI will be advanced beyond comprehension, just like TVs today are from the 50s viewpoint. Just like we could not imagine where the video concept was going back then, we cannot really imagine where AI is going. Buckle up. But it will be spectacular.    *Back then minimum wage was $0.75/hr. Thus, a TV cost more than eight weeks' wages. ------------------------- 
Post a Comment
Read more

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...
Post a Comment
Read more