Skip to main content

The sandbox, tank, swamp



Metaphors for our day: Sandbox, Tank, Swamp. 

Think outside the sandbox, they say.  There is nothing more true than with the Republicans.  Indeed, for the Republicans there is a new sandbox of populism.  It is a genuine caring for, not assuming of, the people.  Trump, much to the chagrin of the traditional Republicans, has changed the sandbox in which they should be playing.  For Republicans, gone are the days of trying to relive the era of Ronald Reagan. What has evolved is a new party.

A tectonic shift of both parties has taken place.  The New Republican message is populism.  It places Americans first, with their aspirations, dreams, and hopes.

Yet, the Democrat sandbox has changed as well.  The New Democrats are now a party appealing to the very rich and supported by the poor.  The former gets the benefits; the latter gets the promises.
The big switch: The New Democrats are now a party of big money. The New Republicans are now a party of the people. In contrast, Bernie Sanders also offered a party for the people.  He was crushed under the treads of big money.

It is true, the “Sandbox” is a benign term.  Its imagery is just a place to play and have fun.  The more ominous term is “The Tank.”  The tank is not a good place to be.  Once there, you are assumed, bagged, tagged, and then ignored.  When there, what you believe is taken, and then you are forsaken.  The poor is there, the press is there, and the immigrants are there.  The diehards of both parties are there.  Remarkably, the unions were there but now are not.  Nor are evangelicals. Nor are suburbanites. Nor are business people.

The tank is not unlike a well for the owner to drink without compensation, without thanks, and without reward.  The tank is a place where occupants are used and reused – and assumed to stay there. No deviations allowed.  More promises or the pillory are given as the Rx to would be defectors.

A third term, “The Swamp,” images another undesirable place.  It portends a place dominated by alligators, snakes, leeches, and bacteria all quite willing to gobble up, consume, and reduce all inside to quivering, obedient occupants.  Avoid the gators and succumb to another form.  Resistance is impossible.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please Comment.

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...
Post a Comment
Read more

UNCERTAINTY IS CERTAIN

  Uncertainty is Certain G. Donald Allen 12/12/2024 1.       Introduction . This short essay is about uncertainty in people from both secular and nonsecular viewpoints. One point that will emerge is that randomly based uncertainty can be a driver for religious structure. Many groups facing uncertainty about their future are deeply religious or rely on faith as a source of comfort, resilience, and guidance. The intersection of uncertainty and religiosity often stems from the human need to find meaning, hope, and stability in the face of unpredictable or challenging circumstances. We first take up the connections of uncertainty to religion for the first real profession, farming, noting that hunting has many similar uncertainties. Below are groups that commonly lean on religious beliefs amidst uncertainty.   This short essay is a follow-up to a previous piece on certainty (https://used-ideas.blogspot.com/2024/12/certainty-is-also-emotion.html). U...
Post a Comment
Read more

Robin Hood and Cliven Bundy

  Actor Herbert Mundin, playing Munch in the 1938 film The Adventures of Robin Hood (starring Errol Flynn) is charged by Prince John's troops of slaying a royal deer in the royal Sherwood forest.  The punishment is death.  Though the events of this film are a portrayal of events dating to the 15th century, they became by the 19th century a "robbing from the rich for the poor" theme so often depicted in other film genres. The William Tell legend is another. The plot is simple.  A poor man desperate to survive tastes the forbidden fruits owned by the authority, and is condemned. I would love to hear this event debated on the current TV news shows.  On the one hand, Munch would be a champion in service to his family.  On the other hand, his legal rights are restricted by legal authority. so, the argument would proceed.  Legal scholars cite statutes chapter and verse, while others would root for the common man.  Fast forward to 2014. Parallels ...
Post a Comment
Read more