Skip to main content

Thoughts XXVII



On the Presidency. With few exceptions, all are humbled, yet intoxicated by the office.

Donald.  Never thought I think it, but his countless unforced errors leads me to think he may fear being President. He fears getting it, understanding that having it is a monumental job.

Hillary. Her unbridled ambition overrides every other consideration. She primarily wants to get it, and then to worry about having it.

Remember the two goals: to get and to have.  They are different. 
------------
Many important leaders have a handler or two.  Almost all lessor leaders, past and present, have handlers. These persons, living in the shadows, suggest  what to do heavy situations, point toward the greater vision,  guide them to say nothing when nothing should be said, and importantly reinforce how great they are in their quest toward the glory to come.  Some have or had no handlers preferring to follow their own vision, perhaps such Eisenhower, T. Roosevelt, Lincoln, and several of the early presidents. All had advisors. Some listen to them; some follow their own compass.  A handler is quite a different animal.  What else do the handlers do?

  • ·       Some  whisper the right thing to do.
  • ·       For some, a careful reading of polls suggests actions.
  • ·       Some whisper the certainty of immortality.
  • ·       Some offer a moral compass as guidance.
  • ·       Some read history following past successes to form guideposts.
  • ·       Some whisper to their client of their personal greatness.
  • ·       Some nourish their own agenda, feeding upon their client.

------------
If you come to a new subject, first think it over. Read a little.  Make your notes and come to a few conclusions.  If you read too soon, what could have been your own ideas will be concealed by vast information.  Your original ideas will be lost.  After you exhaust yourself, then read.  See how original you are and see new things, new approaches and deeper ideas.  Learning is a  process like a predictor-corrector scheme.  You predict. Reading helps you correct.  Repeat this several times.  This leads to your personal ownership of knowledge.
------------
In interpersonal parlance, you do not win the war by winning every argument.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Accepting Fake Information

Every day, we are all bombarded with information, especially on news channels.  One group claims it's false; another calls it the truth. How can we know when to accept it or alternatively how can we know it's false? There are several factors which influence acceptance of fake or false information. Here are the big four.  Some just don’t have the knowledge to discern fact/truth from fiction/fact/false*. Some fake information is cleverly disguised and simply appears to be correct. Some fake information is accepted because the person wants to believe it. Some fake information is accepted because there is no other information to the contrary. However, the acceptance of  information  of any kind become a kind of  truth , and this is a well studied topic. In the link below is an essay on “The Truth About Truth.” This shows simply that what is your point of view, different types of information are generally accepted, fake or not.   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/...

Teaching an Ant How to Read

You have a goal; teach an ant, (sugar ant, fire ant, army ant, any one of them) how to read.   Here are some tips: 1.       First, get its attention. 2.       Show it some examples of reading sources. 3.       Read to the ant, pointing out the words as you go along. 4.       Point to specific words, pronouncing them clearly. 5.       Explain the alphabet, and discuss how words are formed.             The net result for all your careful effort is the ant doesn’t learn a thing.   The obvious reason is that it hasn’t the “brain-power” to learn reading.    Moreover, it isn’t interested even with your infinite patience. It can’t distinguish your sounds.   In short it simply can’t comprehend what you are doing.   Its brain is not wired for learning written and spoken languag...

Can a good argument be made with a bad premise?

Can a good argument be made with a bad premise? Yes. This is done all the time. Not so much in science because all the practitioners know the premises and are not easily deceived. It is a part of their training. You will find the most excellent arguments made upon bad premises* in politics, political speech, and social communication. Sometimes, bad premises are the basis of demagoguery, to incite, to pass legislation, to go to war. Sometimes, we all make great arguments to others, though with an error in the premises. Now, let’s look for a moment at the many types of bad premises. 1.      Wishful thinking, or you just hope it is so, or you think it should be so. These are deadly to the listener and the speaker. Both parties are deceived. 2.      Expressly for deception. Lawyers make their livings this way with their interpretations of the statues or perhaps what a witness has said. 3.      Vagueness is a leading cause...