Skip to main content

Thoughts XXVII



On the Presidency. With few exceptions, all are humbled, yet intoxicated by the office.

Donald.  Never thought I think it, but his countless unforced errors leads me to think he may fear being President. He fears getting it, understanding that having it is a monumental job.

Hillary. Her unbridled ambition overrides every other consideration. She primarily wants to get it, and then to worry about having it.

Remember the two goals: to get and to have.  They are different. 
------------
Many important leaders have a handler or two.  Almost all lessor leaders, past and present, have handlers. These persons, living in the shadows, suggest  what to do heavy situations, point toward the greater vision,  guide them to say nothing when nothing should be said, and importantly reinforce how great they are in their quest toward the glory to come.  Some have or had no handlers preferring to follow their own vision, perhaps such Eisenhower, T. Roosevelt, Lincoln, and several of the early presidents. All had advisors. Some listen to them; some follow their own compass.  A handler is quite a different animal.  What else do the handlers do?

  • ·       Some  whisper the right thing to do.
  • ·       For some, a careful reading of polls suggests actions.
  • ·       Some whisper the certainty of immortality.
  • ·       Some offer a moral compass as guidance.
  • ·       Some read history following past successes to form guideposts.
  • ·       Some whisper to their client of their personal greatness.
  • ·       Some nourish their own agenda, feeding upon their client.

------------
If you come to a new subject, first think it over. Read a little.  Make your notes and come to a few conclusions.  If you read too soon, what could have been your own ideas will be concealed by vast information.  Your original ideas will be lost.  After you exhaust yourself, then read.  See how original you are and see new things, new approaches and deeper ideas.  Learning is a  process like a predictor-corrector scheme.  You predict. Reading helps you correct.  Repeat this several times.  This leads to your personal ownership of knowledge.
------------
In interpersonal parlance, you do not win the war by winning every argument.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

The Lemming Instinct

  In certain vital domains, a pervasive mediocrity among practitioners can stifle genuine advancement. When the intellectual output of a field is predominantly average, it inevitably produces research of corresponding quality. Nevertheless, some of these ideas, by sheer chance or perhaps through effective dissemination, will inevitably gain traction. A significant number of scholars and researchers will gravitate towards these trends, contributing to and propagating further work along these established lines. Such a trajectory allows an initially flawed concept to ascend to the status of mainstream orthodoxy. However, over an extended period, these prevailing ideas invariably fail to withstand rigorous scrutiny; they are ultimately and conclusively disproven. The disheartening pattern then reveals itself: rather than genuine progress, an equally unvalidated or incorrect idea often supplants the discredited one, swiftly establishing its own dominance. This cycle perpetuates, ensurin...

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...