Skip to main content

Thoughts XXVII



On the Presidency. With few exceptions, all are humbled, yet intoxicated by the office.

Donald.  Never thought I think it, but his countless unforced errors leads me to think he may fear being President. He fears getting it, understanding that having it is a monumental job.

Hillary. Her unbridled ambition overrides every other consideration. She primarily wants to get it, and then to worry about having it.

Remember the two goals: to get and to have.  They are different. 
------------
Many important leaders have a handler or two.  Almost all lessor leaders, past and present, have handlers. These persons, living in the shadows, suggest  what to do heavy situations, point toward the greater vision,  guide them to say nothing when nothing should be said, and importantly reinforce how great they are in their quest toward the glory to come.  Some have or had no handlers preferring to follow their own vision, perhaps such Eisenhower, T. Roosevelt, Lincoln, and several of the early presidents. All had advisors. Some listen to them; some follow their own compass.  A handler is quite a different animal.  What else do the handlers do?

  • ·       Some  whisper the right thing to do.
  • ·       For some, a careful reading of polls suggests actions.
  • ·       Some whisper the certainty of immortality.
  • ·       Some offer a moral compass as guidance.
  • ·       Some read history following past successes to form guideposts.
  • ·       Some whisper to their client of their personal greatness.
  • ·       Some nourish their own agenda, feeding upon their client.

------------
If you come to a new subject, first think it over. Read a little.  Make your notes and come to a few conclusions.  If you read too soon, what could have been your own ideas will be concealed by vast information.  Your original ideas will be lost.  After you exhaust yourself, then read.  See how original you are and see new things, new approaches and deeper ideas.  Learning is a  process like a predictor-corrector scheme.  You predict. Reading helps you correct.  Repeat this several times.  This leads to your personal ownership of knowledge.
------------
In interpersonal parlance, you do not win the war by winning every argument.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

Where is AI (Artificial Intelligence) Going?

  How to view Artificial Intelligence (AI).  Imagine you go to the store to buy a TV, but all they have are 1950s models, black and white, circular screens, picture rolls, and picture imperfect, no remote. You’d say no thanks. Back in the day, they sold wildly. The TV was a must-have for everyone with $250 to spend* (about $3000 today). Compared to where AI is today, this is more or less where TVs were 70 years ago. In only a few decades AI will be advanced beyond comprehension, just like TVs today are from the 50s viewpoint. Just like we could not imagine where the video concept was going back then, we cannot really imagine where AI is going. Buckle up. But it will be spectacular.    *Back then minimum wage was $0.75/hr. Thus, a TV cost more than eight weeks' wages. ------------------------- 

Fake News

If you've been following the news the last couple of days, you will note the flurry of copy devoted to fake news.  Both sides are blaming whatever has befallen them the consequence of fake news.  Let's look at this phenomenon a bit.    When I was a student years ago, a friend climbed some mountain in Peru.   A article was written in the local newspaper about the event.   In only three column inches, the newspaper made about six errors.   An easy article to write you say?   Just interview and reproduce.   Yet so many errors?   The question is this: was this fake news or bad reporting?   The idea here is that fake news comes in various flavors. Bad reporting – errors made by the author or editor Opinion presented as news     Deliberate creation of falsehoods to favor a point of view       The reporting of selected truths to favor a particular point of view Now we have the big social media ...