Skip to main content

Thoughts XXVII



On the Presidency. With few exceptions, all are humbled, yet intoxicated by the office.

Donald.  Never thought I think it, but his countless unforced errors leads me to think he may fear being President. He fears getting it, understanding that having it is a monumental job.

Hillary. Her unbridled ambition overrides every other consideration. She primarily wants to get it, and then to worry about having it.

Remember the two goals: to get and to have.  They are different. 
------------
Many important leaders have a handler or two.  Almost all lessor leaders, past and present, have handlers. These persons, living in the shadows, suggest  what to do heavy situations, point toward the greater vision,  guide them to say nothing when nothing should be said, and importantly reinforce how great they are in their quest toward the glory to come.  Some have or had no handlers preferring to follow their own vision, perhaps such Eisenhower, T. Roosevelt, Lincoln, and several of the early presidents. All had advisors. Some listen to them; some follow their own compass.  A handler is quite a different animal.  What else do the handlers do?

  • ·       Some  whisper the right thing to do.
  • ·       For some, a careful reading of polls suggests actions.
  • ·       Some whisper the certainty of immortality.
  • ·       Some offer a moral compass as guidance.
  • ·       Some read history following past successes to form guideposts.
  • ·       Some whisper to their client of their personal greatness.
  • ·       Some nourish their own agenda, feeding upon their client.

------------
If you come to a new subject, first think it over. Read a little.  Make your notes and come to a few conclusions.  If you read too soon, what could have been your own ideas will be concealed by vast information.  Your original ideas will be lost.  After you exhaust yourself, then read.  See how original you are and see new things, new approaches and deeper ideas.  Learning is a  process like a predictor-corrector scheme.  You predict. Reading helps you correct.  Repeat this several times.  This leads to your personal ownership of knowledge.
------------
In interpersonal parlance, you do not win the war by winning every argument.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Accepting Fake Information

Every day, we are all bombarded with information, especially on news channels.  One group claims it's false; another calls it the truth. How can we know when to accept it or alternatively how can we know it's false? There are several factors which influence acceptance of fake or false information. Here are the big four.  Some just don’t have the knowledge to discern fact/truth from fiction/fact/false*. Some fake information is cleverly disguised and simply appears to be correct. Some fake information is accepted because the person wants to believe it. Some fake information is accepted because there is no other information to the contrary. However, the acceptance of  information  of any kind become a kind of  truth , and this is a well studied topic. In the link below is an essay on “The Truth About Truth.” This shows simply that what is your point of view, different types of information are generally accepted, fake or not.   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/g-donald-allen-420b03

Your Brain Within Your Brain

  Your Bicameral Brain by Don Allen Have you ever gone to another room to get something, but when you got there you forgot what you were after? Have you ever experienced a flash of insight, but when you went to look it up online, you couldn’t even remember the keyword? You think you forgot it completely. How can it happen so fast? You worry your memory is failing. Are you merely absent-minded? You try to be amused. But maybe you didn’t forget.   Just maybe that flash of insight, clear and present for an instant, was never given in the verbal form, but another type of intelligence you possess, that you use, and that communicates only to you. We are trained to live in a verbal world, where words matter most. Aside from emotions, we are unable to conjure up other, nonverbal, forms of intelligence we primitively, pre-verbally, possess but don’t know how to use. Alas, we live in a world of words, stewing in the alphabet, sleeping under pages of paragraphs, almost ignoring one of

Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious?

  Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious? I truly like the study of consciousness, though it is safe to say no one really knows what it is. Some philosophers has avoided the problem by claiming consciousness simply doesn’t exist. It's the ultimate escape clause. However, the "therefore, it does not exist" argument also applies to "truth", "God", and even "reality" all quite beyond a consensus description for at least three millennia. For each issue or problem defying description or understanding, simply escape the problem by claiming it doesn’t exist. Problem solved or problem avoided? Alternately, as Daniel Dennett explains consciousness as an account of the various calculations occurring in the brain at close to the same time. However, he goes on to say that consciousness is so insignificant, especially compared to our exalted notions of it, that it might as well not exist [1] . Oh, well. Getting back to consciousness, most of us have view