Skip to main content

Thoughts XXV - Quotes



From Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770-1834) we note both the left (e.g. Marx) and right have used his philosophy in their own interests. Here are two paraphrased quotes and applicable today.

---Freedom under law is a constructive force.  Freedom from law is impossible in nature and destructive in society. 

---Morality must be a common bond, not an individual preference.

An amusing anecdote about Hegel, famous for his opacity, is this. When asked what a particularly difficult paragraph in one of his books actually meant, Hegel responded, "When I wrote it, only God and I understood its meaning.  Now only God does."
------------
Another quote but not from Hegel: The embers of enlightenment may glow for centuries before catching fire.
-------------
Speaking of philosophy, I could give a course on Immanuel Kant***, a philosopher difficult to understand.  I could, in my lectures, give 50 of his philosophical issues with appropriate responses. I could tell my students that ten of these issues in the form of questions would be on the exam and to give the response.  Most students would get them correct.  Almost none would understand what they submitted.  Such is the exam format of modern college courses and modern political debates; they differentiate only those who prepare.
-------------
How to eliminate terrorism?  Just declare it doesn't exist, and if that fails, ignore it.  This is a common technique, used particularly by failing institutions.  For example, United States school children have for years performed poorly on the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) test, the internationally accepted measure of academic performance in math, science, and reading****. In math the US came in 36th, in science 28th and in reading 24th. Not good. Even with much testing and the Common Core Curriculum, which were supposed to improve student performance, student performance still decreased.  In fact, in the past year (Scholastic Aptitude Test) SAT scores dropped again*. Back to the PISA, it is not surprising to hear from the educationalists on this. They say, "Ignore PISA entirely**."  Basically, it is irrelevant to the already great US educational system. In the stroke of a pen, a problem is solved. We will see the education community climb on board quickly.  

Is this something like a country not doing well at the Olympics unilaterally declaring these contests are irrelevant to our already excellent sports programs?

----------------------------
*http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/high_school_and_beyond/2016/09/SAT_results_2016.html
**https://www.tes.com/news/school-news/breaking-news/ignore-pisa-entirely-argues-top-academic
*** https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_Kant
**** http://www.bbc.com/news/business-26249042
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please Comment.

Popular posts from this blog

Accepting Fake Information

Every day, we are all bombarded with information, especially on news channels.  One group claims it's false; another calls it the truth. How can we know when to accept it or alternatively how can we know it's false? There are several factors which influence acceptance of fake or false information. Here are the big four.  Some just don’t have the knowledge to discern fact/truth from fiction/fact/false*. Some fake information is cleverly disguised and simply appears to be correct. Some fake information is accepted because the person wants to believe it. Some fake information is accepted because there is no other information to the contrary. However, the acceptance of  information  of any kind become a kind of  truth , and this is a well studied topic. In the link below is an essay on “The Truth About Truth.” This shows simply that what is your point of view, different types of information are generally accepted, fake or not.   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/g-donald-allen-420b03
Post a Comment
Read more

Your Brain Within Your Brain

  Your Bicameral Brain by Don Allen Have you ever gone to another room to get something, but when you got there you forgot what you were after? Have you ever experienced a flash of insight, but when you went to look it up online, you couldn’t even remember the keyword? You think you forgot it completely. How can it happen so fast? You worry your memory is failing. Are you merely absent-minded? You try to be amused. But maybe you didn’t forget.   Just maybe that flash of insight, clear and present for an instant, was never given in the verbal form, but another type of intelligence you possess, that you use, and that communicates only to you. We are trained to live in a verbal world, where words matter most. Aside from emotions, we are unable to conjure up other, nonverbal, forms of intelligence we primitively, pre-verbally, possess but don’t know how to use. Alas, we live in a world of words, stewing in the alphabet, sleeping under pages of paragraphs, almost ignoring one of
Post a Comment
Read more

Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious?

  Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious? I truly like the study of consciousness, though it is safe to say no one really knows what it is. Some philosophers has avoided the problem by claiming consciousness simply doesn’t exist. It's the ultimate escape clause. However, the "therefore, it does not exist" argument also applies to "truth", "God", and even "reality" all quite beyond a consensus description for at least three millennia. For each issue or problem defying description or understanding, simply escape the problem by claiming it doesn’t exist. Problem solved or problem avoided? Alternately, as Daniel Dennett explains consciousness as an account of the various calculations occurring in the brain at close to the same time. However, he goes on to say that consciousness is so insignificant, especially compared to our exalted notions of it, that it might as well not exist [1] . Oh, well. Getting back to consciousness, most of us have view
Post a Comment
Read more