Skip to main content

The Darkness of Big Data - IV Medicine



Big Data and Medicine

Even now servers and their machine learning algorithms are digesting as much medical data they can find.  They have now learned to diagnose medical problems at a truly professional level.  One problem confronting the medical community now is whether to accept such diagnoses as the diagnosis.  This is not a little problem. It is a problem with repercussions across all of medicine, from the school to the courtroom.  Let’s look at a few elementary considerations.

Tools will be put in the hands of the medical practitioner and physician's assistant. The patient may not even qualify to see a doctor until after this “procedure.”

The doctor contradicting the diagnosis is put at legal risk.  Medical research and new procedures will be undermined. On the other hand, if the doctor goes with machine learning, he/she has a legal defense built in. 

The medical schools will teach doctors to rely on the software.  This could undermine their diagnostic discipline, making them the tools of the software.  Sure, they will offer comfort and prescribe the recommend medicine. But their self-confidence will be undermined.  They will relax, losing basic sharpness with their fundamental skills.

The drug companies will become fierce competitors to make their new drugs acceptable for diagnostic recommendations. 

One consequence is that new innovations in medicine will be diminished.  Another is that such engines will strongly enhance the "abilities" poor doctors. (This is actually good.)  The poorest doctors will get better; the better doctors will get poorer, or at best extremely more cautious. 
 ---------------------------------
This is the fourth part of a series:
http://used-ideas.blogspot.com/2016/04/the-darkness-of-big-data.html
http://used-ideas.blogspot.com/2016/04/the-darkess-of-big-data-ii.html
http://used-ideas.blogspot.com/2016/04/the-darkness-of-big-data-iii.html 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

The Lemming Instinct

  In certain vital domains, a pervasive mediocrity among practitioners can stifle genuine advancement. When the intellectual output of a field is predominantly average, it inevitably produces research of corresponding quality. Nevertheless, some of these ideas, by sheer chance or perhaps through effective dissemination, will inevitably gain traction. A significant number of scholars and researchers will gravitate towards these trends, contributing to and propagating further work along these established lines. Such a trajectory allows an initially flawed concept to ascend to the status of mainstream orthodoxy. However, over an extended period, these prevailing ideas invariably fail to withstand rigorous scrutiny; they are ultimately and conclusively disproven. The disheartening pattern then reveals itself: rather than genuine progress, an equally unvalidated or incorrect idea often supplants the discredited one, swiftly establishing its own dominance. This cycle perpetuates, ensurin...

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...