Skip to main content

The Darkness of Big Data - IV Medicine



Big Data and Medicine

Even now servers and their machine learning algorithms are digesting as much medical data they can find.  They have now learned to diagnose medical problems at a truly professional level.  One problem confronting the medical community now is whether to accept such diagnoses as the diagnosis.  This is not a little problem. It is a problem with repercussions across all of medicine, from the school to the courtroom.  Let’s look at a few elementary considerations.

Tools will be put in the hands of the medical practitioner and physician's assistant. The patient may not even qualify to see a doctor until after this “procedure.”

The doctor contradicting the diagnosis is put at legal risk.  Medical research and new procedures will be undermined. On the other hand, if the doctor goes with machine learning, he/she has a legal defense built in. 

The medical schools will teach doctors to rely on the software.  This could undermine their diagnostic discipline, making them the tools of the software.  Sure, they will offer comfort and prescribe the recommend medicine. But their self-confidence will be undermined.  They will relax, losing basic sharpness with their fundamental skills.

The drug companies will become fierce competitors to make their new drugs acceptable for diagnostic recommendations. 

One consequence is that new innovations in medicine will be diminished.  Another is that such engines will strongly enhance the "abilities" poor doctors. (This is actually good.)  The poorest doctors will get better; the better doctors will get poorer, or at best extremely more cautious. 
 ---------------------------------
This is the fourth part of a series:
http://used-ideas.blogspot.com/2016/04/the-darkness-of-big-data.html
http://used-ideas.blogspot.com/2016/04/the-darkess-of-big-data-ii.html
http://used-ideas.blogspot.com/2016/04/the-darkness-of-big-data-iii.html 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

UNCERTAINTY IS CERTAIN

  Uncertainty is Certain G. Donald Allen 12/12/2024 1.       Introduction . This short essay is about uncertainty in people from both secular and nonsecular viewpoints. One point that will emerge is that randomly based uncertainty can be a driver for religious structure. Many groups facing uncertainty about their future are deeply religious or rely on faith as a source of comfort, resilience, and guidance. The intersection of uncertainty and religiosity often stems from the human need to find meaning, hope, and stability in the face of unpredictable or challenging circumstances. We first take up the connections of uncertainty to religion for the first real profession, farming, noting that hunting has many similar uncertainties. Below are groups that commonly lean on religious beliefs amidst uncertainty.   This short essay is a follow-up to a previous piece on certainty (https://used-ideas.blogspot.com/2024/12/certainty-is-also-emotion.html). U...

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...

Where is AI (Artificial Intelligence) Going?

  How to view Artificial Intelligence (AI).  Imagine you go to the store to buy a TV, but all they have are 1950s models, black and white, circular screens, picture rolls, and picture imperfect, no remote. You’d say no thanks. Back in the day, they sold wildly. The TV was a must-have for everyone with $250 to spend* (about $3000 today). Compared to where AI is today, this is more or less where TVs were 70 years ago. In only a few decades AI will be advanced beyond comprehension, just like TVs today are from the 50s viewpoint. Just like we could not imagine where the video concept was going back then, we cannot really imagine where AI is going. Buckle up. But it will be spectacular.    *Back then minimum wage was $0.75/hr. Thus, a TV cost more than eight weeks' wages. -------------------------