Skip to main content

The Darkness of Big Data - IV Medicine



Big Data and Medicine

Even now servers and their machine learning algorithms are digesting as much medical data they can find.  They have now learned to diagnose medical problems at a truly professional level.  One problem confronting the medical community now is whether to accept such diagnoses as the diagnosis.  This is not a little problem. It is a problem with repercussions across all of medicine, from the school to the courtroom.  Let’s look at a few elementary considerations.

Tools will be put in the hands of the medical practitioner and physician's assistant. The patient may not even qualify to see a doctor until after this “procedure.”

The doctor contradicting the diagnosis is put at legal risk.  Medical research and new procedures will be undermined. On the other hand, if the doctor goes with machine learning, he/she has a legal defense built in. 

The medical schools will teach doctors to rely on the software.  This could undermine their diagnostic discipline, making them the tools of the software.  Sure, they will offer comfort and prescribe the recommend medicine. But their self-confidence will be undermined.  They will relax, losing basic sharpness with their fundamental skills.

The drug companies will become fierce competitors to make their new drugs acceptable for diagnostic recommendations. 

One consequence is that new innovations in medicine will be diminished.  Another is that such engines will strongly enhance the "abilities" poor doctors. (This is actually good.)  The poorest doctors will get better; the better doctors will get poorer, or at best extremely more cautious. 
 ---------------------------------
This is the fourth part of a series:
http://used-ideas.blogspot.com/2016/04/the-darkness-of-big-data.html
http://used-ideas.blogspot.com/2016/04/the-darkess-of-big-data-ii.html
http://used-ideas.blogspot.com/2016/04/the-darkness-of-big-data-iii.html 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Human Simulation is Possible - by Humans

  Human Simulation: Agent-Based Modeling and the Computational Case for Our Reality   1.       Introduction In the essay, we introduce the notion that humanity could be a deliberate simulation based on an extremely simple single-celled organism, hardly anything more complex than that. This will allow an (apparently) new interpretation of the notion that humanity is simulated, but that there is no master engineer at a massive number of dials and switches, responsible for every twist and turn of our universe and lives. We begin with the notion that the universe exists and operates under its own laws. So, given the Earth [2] , when and where life first began, it was infused with a living agent, self-actualized, reproductive, and with other basic rules for its operations, interactions, and much of what single-celled organisms do today. The idea from this occurred some years back when writing code in ActionScript (formerly Flash), I was able to create...

The Calculus of Ideas and Patterns

  Introduction. When dealing with ideas, patterns, intuition, and brainstorming, we need operations or rules not unlike those of arithmetic. The goal is not proof, a finished device, or a fait accompli , but rather a foundation for further investigation and study. In some cases, these operations may yield a proposition, that is, something capable of being proved. In this sense, they form a practical logic of intuition. The article concludes with a few select examples from a variety of venues. Setting. We are working with a given idea, problem, or project, or simply just thinking. Our aim is to discover pathways, patterns, or conceptual connections that may be useful. The following operations describe ways in which ideas and patterns can be generated, transformed, or refined. These also work toward understanding the imagination. Yet, this framework is distinguished from formal logic and proof. We are tempted to call them as “soft logic” because while nothing is proved, reasons...

Freedom of Speech

  Think of freedom of speech as a living organism. Then think of what is required for it to survive. Coming to mind are a population agreeable to its constitution (its environment) and the institutions (its nutrients) that keep it healthy. Currently, many institutions, including some political parties, question unfettered freedom of speech and are working to deny it, claiming it is unhealthy for the body politic. Yes? No?