Skip to main content

The Darkness of Big Data - III



Rules for Modern Living with Big Data

We, the citizens of our community, have a new presence, almost a consciousness living in parallel with us.  Something of a semi-consciousness, not contained in a single vessel, it make observations, accomplishes tasks, it makes predictions, and it evolves prescriptions. An essential aspect is in the algorithms that massage, manipulate, and matriculate data to actionable spheres of information.

The algorithms, while not individually conscious do extract and store information about us in large volumes.  It does not hesitate to sift and sort information at the behest of an external agent.   Not unlike you, who also stores great volumes of information, they do nothing with it until a task is set - perhaps by a human operative.  With you, it’s all in a single container.  But with the machine, certain tasks operating like “interrupts” can be continuously active.  You also have certain tasks continuously active, e.g. danger, food.

This is not a self-reflecting or self-aware consciousness, but how many folks do you know that are always doing something, though never reflecting before, during, or after?  Irrelevant is the Turing test.  Forget the Turing test.  This is an inhuman consciousness though the progeny of humans.

It is not unlike having an unknown visitor listening outside our door, 24/7.  This visitor cannot be chased away, but what it learns from listening can be limited.  We know this, happily.  It’s not unlike living in an apartment next to another occupied by a busybody - with great hearing.  We talk more softly.

Get accustomed to the fact that you are not really anonymous.  The servers and their algorithms have unlimited time and will scour many resources to make identifications about you.  This “you” is a statistical “you.”  Otherwise put, it is everyone.  

Don’t
  • Take surveys unless you really want to show support for something.  This includes polls and customer satisfaction surveys.   Always say you have no opinion.  Otherwise, you give more information than the value received.  The survey provider wants information about me to compare with information of thousands of others in its task to learn how to sell better.  Example.  A couple of  years ago I contributed to a political campaign.  Ever since that time, I’ve received dozens of requests for more money, but even more requests to complete various surveys. (I never take the surveys.)  The parties are now into predictive and uplift modeling methods to recruit votes - a modern horror. Now used extensively in politics, it is worth looking up.
  •   Engage with social media sites.  Even posting photos can reveal quite a lot, with image recognition software.  Posting information about your day or family frequently gives the algorithms quite a bit information about what kind of person you are and what stimuli make achieve some desired reaction.
Do
  •   Take anonymous surveys.  But be careful, you are not connected  to the website through cookies. Cookies are hidden little information snippets your computer stores on behalf of some client website.  For example, when I go to amazon.com, it knows who I am right away.  No log in  is necessary.  If I use a different computer, it does not.  I am identified by resident cookies.
  • Use “anonymous” windows that many browsers now offer.  Of course, these merely removes the site tracing from your computer, not the information gleaned about you server side. 
  • Minimize any personal profile of information you post or offer.
BTW, confidential email is an oxymoron.  The cloud is not private. Facebook is a food source for the algorithms. Ditto for blogs, like this one.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

UNCERTAINTY IS CERTAIN

  Uncertainty is Certain G. Donald Allen 12/12/2024 1.       Introduction . This short essay is about uncertainty in people from both secular and nonsecular viewpoints. One point that will emerge is that randomly based uncertainty can be a driver for religious structure. Many groups facing uncertainty about their future are deeply religious or rely on faith as a source of comfort, resilience, and guidance. The intersection of uncertainty and religiosity often stems from the human need to find meaning, hope, and stability in the face of unpredictable or challenging circumstances. We first take up the connections of uncertainty to religion for the first real profession, farming, noting that hunting has many similar uncertainties. Below are groups that commonly lean on religious beliefs amidst uncertainty.   This short essay is a follow-up to a previous piece on certainty (https://used-ideas.blogspot.com/2024/12/certainty-is-also-emotion.html). U...

Robin Hood and Cliven Bundy

  Actor Herbert Mundin, playing Munch in the 1938 film The Adventures of Robin Hood (starring Errol Flynn) is charged by Prince John's troops of slaying a royal deer in the royal Sherwood forest.  The punishment is death.  Though the events of this film are a portrayal of events dating to the 15th century, they became by the 19th century a "robbing from the rich for the poor" theme so often depicted in other film genres. The William Tell legend is another. The plot is simple.  A poor man desperate to survive tastes the forbidden fruits owned by the authority, and is condemned. I would love to hear this event debated on the current TV news shows.  On the one hand, Munch would be a champion in service to his family.  On the other hand, his legal rights are restricted by legal authority. so, the argument would proceed.  Legal scholars cite statutes chapter and verse, while others would root for the common man.  Fast forward to 2014. Parallels ...