Skip to main content

Hillary and Bernie

Both Sanders and Clinton have promoted several new programs from free college tuition to health care for all illegal immigrants.  Some sound good.  Some believe the time has come for such government benefits, services, or beneficence, or whatever you want to call them.   Yet both agree there must be a pathway to funding such really expensive programs. Both believe we should tax the filthy rich, and who's not for them paying more.  After all, their proportional wealth has increased dramatically in the last decade or two.

So, with their programs and tax plans in hand they push their give-aways hoping for your vote.

NOTE.  Before going on, let's ask.  Where are you?  If you're reading this, your probably neither filthy rich nor filthy poor.  You're in the middle.  You pay taxes, and likely a lot of them.  But you surely would enjoy those multimillionaires and billionaires paying more.

Suppose either is elected.  Suppose they implement their programs. Suppose they push through their generous tax plans, aimed of course at the rich.  The programs become law.  Now let's reap in the cash.   They soon discover what Panamanian authorities did only weeks ago when they raided the Panama City headquarters of the Mossack Fonseca law firm.  What was found were 10 million documents of how this firm set up financial accounts set up in tax-haven countries for the super rich to conceal their funds, and to avoid paying taxes.

The upshot here is that the government will come up far short in its quest for tax funds from the rich.   The consequence is that the next tier or two down will be slapped with increased taxes, and likely increased considerably.  This means you and I will pay for even more free stuff - for somebody else.

We cry out, "Let's close the loopholes and then get the money."  You will here this.  Attempts will be made.  Alas, it is too late, the money is already gone.  New laws will be written by a congress influenced ( through generous campaign contributions) by those needing or wanting to conceal cash.   We lose again.  Yet, somebody must pay the price for the stuff.  It will be you and I that covers the tab.  The rich will stay rich, and very rich it seems.  Those in the middle will get poorer;  the poor will get some free stuff;  the filthy rich will remain so, and probably filthier still.

If its Cruz or Trump elected, there won't be as much free stuff.    Yet the rich are essentially politically neutral, benefiting regardless of who is in power.

Promising to hit the rich is a non-starter that only the ignorant don't understand.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

Where is AI (Artificial Intelligence) Going?

  How to view Artificial Intelligence (AI).  Imagine you go to the store to buy a TV, but all they have are 1950s models, black and white, circular screens, picture rolls, and picture imperfect, no remote. You’d say no thanks. Back in the day, they sold wildly. The TV was a must-have for everyone with $250 to spend* (about $3000 today). Compared to where AI is today, this is more or less where TVs were 70 years ago. In only a few decades AI will be advanced beyond comprehension, just like TVs today are from the 50s viewpoint. Just like we could not imagine where the video concept was going back then, we cannot really imagine where AI is going. Buckle up. But it will be spectacular.    *Back then minimum wage was $0.75/hr. Thus, a TV cost more than eight weeks' wages. ------------------------- 

Fake News

If you've been following the news the last couple of days, you will note the flurry of copy devoted to fake news.  Both sides are blaming whatever has befallen them the consequence of fake news.  Let's look at this phenomenon a bit.    When I was a student years ago, a friend climbed some mountain in Peru.   A article was written in the local newspaper about the event.   In only three column inches, the newspaper made about six errors.   An easy article to write you say?   Just interview and reproduce.   Yet so many errors?   The question is this: was this fake news or bad reporting?   The idea here is that fake news comes in various flavors. Bad reporting – errors made by the author or editor Opinion presented as news     Deliberate creation of falsehoods to favor a point of view       The reporting of selected truths to favor a particular point of view Now we have the big social media ...