Skip to main content

Hillary and Bernie

Both Sanders and Clinton have promoted several new programs from free college tuition to health care for all illegal immigrants.  Some sound good.  Some believe the time has come for such government benefits, services, or beneficence, or whatever you want to call them.   Yet both agree there must be a pathway to funding such really expensive programs. Both believe we should tax the filthy rich, and who's not for them paying more.  After all, their proportional wealth has increased dramatically in the last decade or two.

So, with their programs and tax plans in hand they push their give-aways hoping for your vote.

NOTE.  Before going on, let's ask.  Where are you?  If you're reading this, your probably neither filthy rich nor filthy poor.  You're in the middle.  You pay taxes, and likely a lot of them.  But you surely would enjoy those multimillionaires and billionaires paying more.

Suppose either is elected.  Suppose they implement their programs. Suppose they push through their generous tax plans, aimed of course at the rich.  The programs become law.  Now let's reap in the cash.   They soon discover what Panamanian authorities did only weeks ago when they raided the Panama City headquarters of the Mossack Fonseca law firm.  What was found were 10 million documents of how this firm set up financial accounts set up in tax-haven countries for the super rich to conceal their funds, and to avoid paying taxes.

The upshot here is that the government will come up far short in its quest for tax funds from the rich.   The consequence is that the next tier or two down will be slapped with increased taxes, and likely increased considerably.  This means you and I will pay for even more free stuff - for somebody else.

We cry out, "Let's close the loopholes and then get the money."  You will here this.  Attempts will be made.  Alas, it is too late, the money is already gone.  New laws will be written by a congress influenced ( through generous campaign contributions) by those needing or wanting to conceal cash.   We lose again.  Yet, somebody must pay the price for the stuff.  It will be you and I that covers the tab.  The rich will stay rich, and very rich it seems.  Those in the middle will get poorer;  the poor will get some free stuff;  the filthy rich will remain so, and probably filthier still.

If its Cruz or Trump elected, there won't be as much free stuff.    Yet the rich are essentially politically neutral, benefiting regardless of who is in power.

Promising to hit the rich is a non-starter that only the ignorant don't understand.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Accepting Fake Information

Every day, we are all bombarded with information, especially on news channels.  One group claims it's false; another calls it the truth. How can we know when to accept it or alternatively how can we know it's false? There are several factors which influence acceptance of fake or false information. Here are the big four.  Some just don’t have the knowledge to discern fact/truth from fiction/fact/false*. Some fake information is cleverly disguised and simply appears to be correct. Some fake information is accepted because the person wants to believe it. Some fake information is accepted because there is no other information to the contrary. However, the acceptance of  information  of any kind become a kind of  truth , and this is a well studied topic. In the link below is an essay on “The Truth About Truth.” This shows simply that what is your point of view, different types of information are generally accepted, fake or not.   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/g-donald-allen-420b03

Your Brain Within Your Brain

  Your Bicameral Brain by Don Allen Have you ever gone to another room to get something, but when you got there you forgot what you were after? Have you ever experienced a flash of insight, but when you went to look it up online, you couldn’t even remember the keyword? You think you forgot it completely. How can it happen so fast? You worry your memory is failing. Are you merely absent-minded? You try to be amused. But maybe you didn’t forget.   Just maybe that flash of insight, clear and present for an instant, was never given in the verbal form, but another type of intelligence you possess, that you use, and that communicates only to you. We are trained to live in a verbal world, where words matter most. Aside from emotions, we are unable to conjure up other, nonverbal, forms of intelligence we primitively, pre-verbally, possess but don’t know how to use. Alas, we live in a world of words, stewing in the alphabet, sleeping under pages of paragraphs, almost ignoring one of

Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious?

  Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious? I truly like the study of consciousness, though it is safe to say no one really knows what it is. Some philosophers has avoided the problem by claiming consciousness simply doesn’t exist. It's the ultimate escape clause. However, the "therefore, it does not exist" argument also applies to "truth", "God", and even "reality" all quite beyond a consensus description for at least three millennia. For each issue or problem defying description or understanding, simply escape the problem by claiming it doesn’t exist. Problem solved or problem avoided? Alternately, as Daniel Dennett explains consciousness as an account of the various calculations occurring in the brain at close to the same time. However, he goes on to say that consciousness is so insignificant, especially compared to our exalted notions of it, that it might as well not exist [1] . Oh, well. Getting back to consciousness, most of us have view