Skip to main content

Presidential Politics V - Carly Fiorina



I used to like Presidential candidate Carly Fiorina for her practical viewpoints on how to proceed to restore our nation to its former greatness. She seems experienced.  She seems knowledgeable.  She does make some great sound bites.   

Yet she scolds, and even preaches to us, explaining mostly how she is the perfect choice to solve the big problems of our day, and also how she could confront delimit and then defeat Hillary Clinton.  She deprecates everyone, not just the democrats.    She talks to us as if we are ignorant and the government is doing nothing and can do nothing.  On security, she talks about applying big data algorithms as though she understands them, but she betrays her ignorance of the size of the data sets (zettabytes) she wishes to examine.  Her broad strokes on security are designed only for the masses and newscasts. 

Let’s face it.  The Presidential job has become almost too large for anyone.   We, the country, may be seeking what we cannot have, or what does not exist.   As the government becomes larger, this search multiplies itself.  The size itself creates a systemic incompetency, an impossible problem of governance, a source of perennial corruption, and a system within which general compliance is not possible.

Fiorina does have experience based on business expertise.  This is true, but it is her single claim.  She has demonstrated little political expertise on how to work with the disparate forces that comprise a government.  She claims to have met the big time leaders in the world, but she has not developed programs with them.  A business meeting does not constitute a relationship.  

What the business candidates running in this cycle tell us is that their experience is needed to run the government.  What none of them, Carly in particular, realize is that the size of the government is on a scale at least four orders or 10,000 times the size of what they previously controlled. To put this in perspective, imagine a leader of a ten million dollar concern ( a modest sized company or a small city) claiming they could jump to command a one hundred billion dollar company (say like IBM), where little actual control is possible from an executive standpoint.   Yet our country is yet ten times this size.   A moment's consideration indicates financial business experience is not impressive and possible not the answer.    For example, I run a modest $100,000/year household, but I do not claim to be capable of running a $1 billion dollar enterprise. 

On the other hand, strictly political experience is not the answer either.  We need an executive with both fiduciary and political experience, or at least a working knowledge. Few of them, on either side have these.   Particularly, the children (Rubio and Cruz) do not have either.   We are left with no clear choice based on criteria; we are left with our intuition.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lies, Deceit, and the National Agenda

The world you grew up in is no more.  The world of reasonable honesty and reasonable lies has been replaced by abject dishonesty and blatant lies. Lies.  Yes. People have always told them.  You have told them; so have I.   We need lies; they are a foundational structure of social living.  They both deceive and protect.  Children tell them to their parents to avoid consequences, like punishment.  Adults tell them to their bosses, to enhance their position and/or avoid consequences of poor performance.  Our bosses tell them to their boards to suggest business is good, the project is on target, or the detractors are wrong.  The boards tell them to shareholders to protect their own credibility and most importantly, stock values.   Our politicians tell lies to their constituents, though sometimes innocently with them not actually knowing much more than they've been told.  They enhance their positio...

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

UNCERTAINTY IS CERTAIN

  Uncertainty is Certain G. Donald Allen 12/12/2024 1.       Introduction . This short essay is about uncertainty in people from both secular and nonsecular viewpoints. One point that will emerge is that randomly based uncertainty can be a driver for religious structure. Many groups facing uncertainty about their future are deeply religious or rely on faith as a source of comfort, resilience, and guidance. The intersection of uncertainty and religiosity often stems from the human need to find meaning, hope, and stability in the face of unpredictable or challenging circumstances. We first take up the connections of uncertainty to religion for the first real profession, farming, noting that hunting has many similar uncertainties. Below are groups that commonly lean on religious beliefs amidst uncertainty.   This short essay is a follow-up to a previous piece on certainty (https://used-ideas.blogspot.com/2024/12/certainty-is-also-emotion.html). U...