Skip to main content

Presidential Politics - III - deep concerns



What concerns me about Republicans is that there seem to be candidates from moderate to far right all advocating courses of action, many contradicting the other.  Moreover, many seem to have a firm constituency that believes in the correctness of their proposals.  It is the lack of internal consensus that is of greatest concern.  All camps delight in extolling their virtues in equal measure to their opponents’ faults.  Another, most troubling concern, is that of the polls.  In this cycle, we see complete amateurs vying for the top spot, with essentially no records of achievement – except possibly with giving speeches.  Overall, there is so much internal dissent, it has become disturbing.  Pollsters, even the most honest, have little experience polling preferences among such a large group of participants.  They give percentages of error not sustainable even by elementary statistical methods.   Moreover, they have no method of accommodating newsworthy visibility.   Yet, polls are driving the competition like nothing else.  

What concerns me about the Democrats is that all the candidates are some flavor of progressive – mostly a far left viewpoint of how this nation should operate.  Progressivism is almost exclusively concerned with social policy.   In this case there are only two (really) candidates, both with similar views, competing over shades of gray.   A recent piece in Solon.com entitled “Just let the Republicans win: Maybe things need to get really bad before America wakes up” summarizes the viewpoint that no matter how bad our person is, morally, ethically, or capably, what is important is the progressive agenda.   What is of more concern is the abject loyalty of Democrats toward the progressive candidates regardless of their positions, their flaws, or their records.  There seems so little internal dissent it has become disturbing. 

However, over the brief 220 year history of this country, we have seen consistent and periodic swings between the relatively liberal and relatively conservative agendas.  It is as if, the country can endure one direction only to unspecified limits before it signals a change is in order.  The observer may quip maybe we should find middle ground, some compromise between the two, leading to a steady and stable future.  However, that is not the way politics works.  It does work by contrast, conflict, and contradiction.  Always has.   A current change has been in the absence of compromise in respective positions among elected officials.  Another is the choices we are offered are no longer “relative” but “extreme.”  This is not good.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please Comment.

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Lemming Instinct

  In certain vital domains, a pervasive mediocrity among practitioners can stifle genuine advancement. When the intellectual output of a field is predominantly average, it inevitably produces research of corresponding quality. Nevertheless, some of these ideas, by sheer chance or perhaps through effective dissemination, will inevitably gain traction. A significant number of scholars and researchers will gravitate towards these trends, contributing to and propagating further work along these established lines. Such a trajectory allows an initially flawed concept to ascend to the status of mainstream orthodoxy. However, over an extended period, these prevailing ideas invariably fail to withstand rigorous scrutiny; they are ultimately and conclusively disproven. The disheartening pattern then reveals itself: rather than genuine progress, an equally unvalidated or incorrect idea often supplants the discredited one, swiftly establishing its own dominance. This cycle perpetuates, ensurin...
Post a Comment
Read more

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...
Post a Comment
Read more