Skip to main content

Presidential Politics - III - deep concerns



What concerns me about Republicans is that there seem to be candidates from moderate to far right all advocating courses of action, many contradicting the other.  Moreover, many seem to have a firm constituency that believes in the correctness of their proposals.  It is the lack of internal consensus that is of greatest concern.  All camps delight in extolling their virtues in equal measure to their opponents’ faults.  Another, most troubling concern, is that of the polls.  In this cycle, we see complete amateurs vying for the top spot, with essentially no records of achievement – except possibly with giving speeches.  Overall, there is so much internal dissent, it has become disturbing.  Pollsters, even the most honest, have little experience polling preferences among such a large group of participants.  They give percentages of error not sustainable even by elementary statistical methods.   Moreover, they have no method of accommodating newsworthy visibility.   Yet, polls are driving the competition like nothing else.  

What concerns me about the Democrats is that all the candidates are some flavor of progressive – mostly a far left viewpoint of how this nation should operate.  Progressivism is almost exclusively concerned with social policy.   In this case there are only two (really) candidates, both with similar views, competing over shades of gray.   A recent piece in Solon.com entitled “Just let the Republicans win: Maybe things need to get really bad before America wakes up” summarizes the viewpoint that no matter how bad our person is, morally, ethically, or capably, what is important is the progressive agenda.   What is of more concern is the abject loyalty of Democrats toward the progressive candidates regardless of their positions, their flaws, or their records.  There seems so little internal dissent it has become disturbing. 

However, over the brief 220 year history of this country, we have seen consistent and periodic swings between the relatively liberal and relatively conservative agendas.  It is as if, the country can endure one direction only to unspecified limits before it signals a change is in order.  The observer may quip maybe we should find middle ground, some compromise between the two, leading to a steady and stable future.  However, that is not the way politics works.  It does work by contrast, conflict, and contradiction.  Always has.   A current change has been in the absence of compromise in respective positions among elected officials.  Another is the choices we are offered are no longer “relative” but “extreme.”  This is not good.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please Comment.

Popular posts from this blog

UNCERTAINTY IS CERTAIN

  Uncertainty is Certain G. Donald Allen 12/12/2024 1.       Introduction . This short essay is about uncertainty in people from both secular and nonsecular viewpoints. One point that will emerge is that randomly based uncertainty can be a driver for religious structure. Many groups facing uncertainty about their future are deeply religious or rely on faith as a source of comfort, resilience, and guidance. The intersection of uncertainty and religiosity often stems from the human need to find meaning, hope, and stability in the face of unpredictable or challenging circumstances. We first take up the connections of uncertainty to religion for the first real profession, farming, noting that hunting has many similar uncertainties. Below are groups that commonly lean on religious beliefs amidst uncertainty.   This short essay is a follow-up to a previous piece on certainty (https://used-ideas.blogspot.com/2024/12/certainty-is-also-emotion.html). U...
Post a Comment
Read more

Problem Solving? Then Find Those Gaps

  Problem Solving - Finding Gaps 12/28/2024 Introduction. Solving complex problems often arises from the presence of gaps in knowledge, resources, understanding, or perspectives. These gaps introduce uncertainty, ambiguity, or constraints, making solutions difficult to achieve. Below, we explore the primary types of gaps that complicate problem-solving and their implications. Many are of the technical, informational, theoretical, and social nature. You may discover some of these gaps are also sources of uncertainty in problem-solving, in that they supply us with another list of things that can go wrong based on something missing. Gaps also form a type of impossible problem, that will be discussed in a later chapter. Finally, this essay is about all problems and solutions, not just those of science. Contents Comprehension Gaps Consistency Gaps Solution-Type Gaps Invisible Gaps   Knowledge and Evidence Gaps   Methodological and Technological Gaps Ethical and Cult...
Post a Comment
Read more

CERTAINTY IS ALSO AN EMOTION

  Certainty is also a Feeling Certainty is often viewed as a mental state tied to knowledge and confidence, but it also functions as a feeling with distinct emotional and physiological components. While it arises from cognitive processes, certainty also has a subjective and emotional quality that makes it more than just a rational judgment. It provides a sense of assurance and security that shapes human experience in profound ways. Emotional Dimension . At its core, certainty evokes emotions that influence how we perceive and interact with the world. When someone feels certain, they often experience relief, comfort, or empowerment. These emotions are particularly strong when uncertainty or doubt is resolved, offering a sense of closure. For example, solving a complex problem or having a belief validated by evidence brings not just intellectual satisfaction but also emotional reassurance. Subjectivity. Certainty is inherently personal and subjective. It depends on individual...
Post a Comment
Read more