Presidential Politics

Presidential Politics - I

Who to support????

We see the Democrats performing a type of surgery upon the actions of the President, carefully distinguishing themselves from current policy only on particular matters. They seem to live in fear of a insider condemnation. Or they believe the President is essentially correct but for these particular exceptions. Overall, they are mostly united upon social programs. Overall, they minimize international events, preferring to emphasize domestic issues, upon which there is merit, owing to a world view that every country is an independent agency. If you so believe, this is your expression of what needs to be achieved. If you believe climate change is paramount and more importantly anthropomorphic, these folks are your people.

The Democrats are more-or-less unified in their support for Secretary Clinton. None of her established blemishes seem to matter. Bernie is not viable no matter how many/few like his honest but detached approach. This is inconceivable for Republicans who delight in oppositional dissections.

Yet, the Republican candidates have their own issues, particularly when viewed from a contrast viewpoint. We see a number of approaches, across the board, beyond comparison, with no unifying theme. Let’s look at just a few suggestions offered to us. From these, we pick and choose, hoping to select the correct approach. Most are topical, reflecting current events.

We were a great country, but no longer. It is time to be great again.
We have become a weakened force for maintaining world peace, partly due to our unwillingness to engage terrorists.
Candidate A tells us Candidate B is absolutely wrong, or stupid, or ill-equipped to correct the wrongs before us.
I can do this – because I have the experience, ability, and my record that so demonstrates.
What we should do is create a no fly zone, bomb the enemy, repeal and replace this program, repeal this or that or all Presidential directives, use more troups, and on and on.
I blame the current Administration for … whatever. I won’t do this. The President is weak and incompetent.
The logic of (whatever) is flawed. What we need is consensus and clarity. (I don’t use “transparency” as this term no longer has any meaning in national rhetoric.)

Pick and choose, don’t ask me how. Most of these points engender temporal loyalties. The governors cite experience with executive ability; the senators suggest a deep but fresh understanding; the outsiders claim the time is now for hope and change based on non-political dogmas and experience.

Personally, I have trouble with Hillary partly for her penchant for secrecy, her personal signature. I have trouble with the Republicans mostly because the issues they cite are difficult to prioritize.

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I. I. Introduction. Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II. ...

The Lemming Instinct

In certain vital domains, a pervasive mediocrity among practitioners can stifle genuine advancement. When the intellectual output of a field is predominantly average, it inevitably produces research of corresponding quality. Nevertheless, some of these ideas, by sheer chance or perhaps through effective dissemination, will inevitably gain traction. A significant number of scholars and researchers will gravitate towards these trends, contributing to and propagating further work along these established lines. Such a trajectory allows an initially flawed concept to ascend to the status of mainstream orthodoxy. However, over an extended period, these prevailing ideas invariably fail to withstand rigorous scrutiny; they are ultimately and conclusively disproven. The disheartening pattern then reveals itself: rather than genuine progress, an equally unvalidated or incorrect idea often supplants the discredited one, swiftly establishing its own dominance. This cycle perpetuates, ensurin...

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

The principles we use but don't know it. 1. Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...

First Blog

Search This Blog