Skip to main content

Presidential Politics - I



Who to support????

We see the Democrats performing a type of surgery upon the actions of the President, carefully distinguishing themselves from current policy only on particular matters.  They seem to live in fear of a insider condemnation.  Or they believe the President is essentially correct but for these particular exceptions. Overall, they are mostly united upon social programs.  Overall, they minimize international events, preferring to emphasize domestic issues, upon which there is merit, owing to a world view that every country is an independent agency.  If you so believe, this is your expression of what needs to be achieved.  If you believe climate change is paramount and more importantly anthropomorphic, these folks are your people.   

The Democrats are more-or-less unified in their support for Secretary Clinton.  None of her established blemishes seem to matter.   Bernie is not  viable no matter how many/few like his honest but detached approach.  This is inconceivable for Republicans who delight in oppositional dissections. 

Yet, the Republican candidates have their own issues, particularly when viewed from a contrast viewpoint.  We see a number of approaches, across the board, beyond comparison, with no unifying theme.  Let’s look at just a few suggestions offered to us.  From these, we pick and choose, hoping to select the correct approach.  Most are topical, reflecting current events. 

  •   We were a great country, but no longer.  It is time to be great again. 
  •  We have become a weakened force for maintaining world peace, partly due to our unwillingness to engage terrorists. 
  •  Candidate A tells us Candidate B is absolutely wrong, or stupid, or ill-equipped to correct the wrongs before us. 
  •  I can do this – because I have the experience, ability, and my record that so demonstrates. 
  •  What we should do is create a no fly zone, bomb the enemy, repeal and replace this program, repeal this or that or all Presidential directives, use more troups, and on and on.
  • I blame the current Administration for … whatever.  I won’t do this.  The President is weak and incompetent.
  •   The logic of (whatever) is flawed.  What we need is consensus and clarity. (I don’t use “transparency” as this term no longer has any meaning in national rhetoric.)

Pick and choose, don’t ask me how. Most of these points engender temporal loyalties.  The governors cite experience with executive ability; the senators suggest a deep but fresh understanding; the outsiders claim the time is now for hope and change based on non-political dogmas and experience.

Personally, I have trouble with Hillary partly for her penchant for secrecy, her personal signature.  I have trouble with the Republicans mostly because the issues they cite are difficult to prioritize.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please Comment.

Popular posts from this blog

UNCERTAINTY IS CERTAIN

  Uncertainty is Certain G. Donald Allen 12/12/2024 1.       Introduction . This short essay is about uncertainty in people from both secular and nonsecular viewpoints. One point that will emerge is that randomly based uncertainty can be a driver for religious structure. Many groups facing uncertainty about their future are deeply religious or rely on faith as a source of comfort, resilience, and guidance. The intersection of uncertainty and religiosity often stems from the human need to find meaning, hope, and stability in the face of unpredictable or challenging circumstances. We first take up the connections of uncertainty to religion for the first real profession, farming, noting that hunting has many similar uncertainties. Below are groups that commonly lean on religious beliefs amidst uncertainty.   This short essay is a follow-up to a previous piece on certainty (https://used-ideas.blogspot.com/2024/12/certainty-is-also-emotion.html). U...
Post a Comment
Read more

Problem Solving? Then Find Those Gaps

  Problem Solving - Finding Gaps 12/28/2024 Introduction. Solving complex problems often arises from the presence of gaps in knowledge, resources, understanding, or perspectives. These gaps introduce uncertainty, ambiguity, or constraints, making solutions difficult to achieve. Below, we explore the primary types of gaps that complicate problem-solving and their implications. Many are of the technical, informational, theoretical, and social nature. You may discover some of these gaps are also sources of uncertainty in problem-solving, in that they supply us with another list of things that can go wrong based on something missing. Gaps also form a type of impossible problem, that will be discussed in a later chapter. Finally, this essay is about all problems and solutions, not just those of science. Contents Comprehension Gaps Consistency Gaps Solution-Type Gaps Invisible Gaps   Knowledge and Evidence Gaps   Methodological and Technological Gaps Ethical and Cult...
Post a Comment
Read more

CERTAINTY IS ALSO AN EMOTION

  Certainty is also a Feeling Certainty is often viewed as a mental state tied to knowledge and confidence, but it also functions as a feeling with distinct emotional and physiological components. While it arises from cognitive processes, certainty also has a subjective and emotional quality that makes it more than just a rational judgment. It provides a sense of assurance and security that shapes human experience in profound ways. Emotional Dimension . At its core, certainty evokes emotions that influence how we perceive and interact with the world. When someone feels certain, they often experience relief, comfort, or empowerment. These emotions are particularly strong when uncertainty or doubt is resolved, offering a sense of closure. For example, solving a complex problem or having a belief validated by evidence brings not just intellectual satisfaction but also emotional reassurance. Subjectivity. Certainty is inherently personal and subjective. It depends on individual...
Post a Comment
Read more