Skip to main content

Thoughts XX - big money

 
Big money. Want to get rich?  Invent a biodegradable ink.  With such chemistry, errant youths could have all the tattoos they desire, and not suffer their whole lives with visible proof of temporary insanity.

Bigger money.  You see Facebook ,Twitter, Instagram, and the like as social apps.   It seems that modernity has an unlimited appetite for such apps.  These transcend the now ancient letter, morning coffee, and telephone conversation by miles, even light years.  Create a new such app.  Easy to say, difficult to do,but the rewards are extravagant. 

Really big money. We know the national debt (in 2015) is about 19 trillion dollars.  A lot of money this is.  But what does it mean?  We are crossing scales or orders of magnitude, and this is difficult for almost all people.  Suppose I said that a lifetime is about two billion seconds. (Actually, 2.2 billion seconds.) This is a magnitude of such a value to make it incomprehensible by any measure.  But when I say a life is about 70 years, this we understand well – too well for some of us.  Yet, in terms of dollars the national debt spans four orders of magnitude more. Spanning scales is not easy. The brain doesn't do well, but we try to bring such magnitudes within the scope of understanding.  Case-in-point?  Money and the national debt.  What can be purchased with the $19T?  Tough? Yes.  Let’s go easier and ask what can be purchased with just a measly $1T.   This has been the subject of many articles and examples.  Here are some others.
 With one trillion dollars, I could cover the costs of everything I have dreamed of for myself, my family and my friends and additionally
  • Funding the costs of educating all American K-12 students for one year.
  • A cash award of $3,400 for everyone in the USA.
  • The US government discretionary spending for one year.
  • Funding the interest on the US national debt for four years.
  • Funding US Social Security for about one year.
  • Purchasing  a new $100K home for about 10 million people, or a $250,000 home for every single person in the greater Houston area.
  • Purchasing about 2.5 million “fully equipped” Roll Royce’s  or about 22 million “loaded” Ford Expeditions.
  • Everything sold by Wal-Mart for two years.
Philosophy.  On a philosophical note, it is orders of magnitude that makes the heap paradox so very interesting. We have examined above the nature of understanding the national debt as a dollar-by-dollar event, but could not.  Here's another simple example:  We want to measure in seconds when a person becomes old. We agree that everyone at the age of 80 (or 2.5 billion seconds), is old. Others may consider 60 or 70 years as old. Now at the age of one second, you are not old, and so for two seconds, and three seconds, four seconds, and so on.  Continue this question second-by-second until "old age" is reached. You cannot give an consensus answer.  Partly, this is because the term "old" is vague.  That is, when you examine a vague term such as "old," and use precise mico-terms such as seconds to describe it, the brain breaks down.  It will not suffer such considerations.

In the same way, understanding the national debt, by the dollar, is virtually impossible.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Accepting Fake Information

Every day, we are all bombarded with information, especially on news channels.  One group claims it's false; another calls it the truth. How can we know when to accept it or alternatively how can we know it's false? There are several factors which influence acceptance of fake or false information. Here are the big four.  Some just don’t have the knowledge to discern fact/truth from fiction/fact/false*. Some fake information is cleverly disguised and simply appears to be correct. Some fake information is accepted because the person wants to believe it. Some fake information is accepted because there is no other information to the contrary. However, the acceptance of  information  of any kind become a kind of  truth , and this is a well studied topic. In the link below is an essay on “The Truth About Truth.” This shows simply that what is your point of view, different types of information are generally accepted, fake or not.   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/g-donald-allen-420b03

Your Brain Within Your Brain

  Your Bicameral Brain by Don Allen Have you ever gone to another room to get something, but when you got there you forgot what you were after? Have you ever experienced a flash of insight, but when you went to look it up online, you couldn’t even remember the keyword? You think you forgot it completely. How can it happen so fast? You worry your memory is failing. Are you merely absent-minded? You try to be amused. But maybe you didn’t forget.   Just maybe that flash of insight, clear and present for an instant, was never given in the verbal form, but another type of intelligence you possess, that you use, and that communicates only to you. We are trained to live in a verbal world, where words matter most. Aside from emotions, we are unable to conjure up other, nonverbal, forms of intelligence we primitively, pre-verbally, possess but don’t know how to use. Alas, we live in a world of words, stewing in the alphabet, sleeping under pages of paragraphs, almost ignoring one of

Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious?

  Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious? I truly like the study of consciousness, though it is safe to say no one really knows what it is. Some philosophers has avoided the problem by claiming consciousness simply doesn’t exist. It's the ultimate escape clause. However, the "therefore, it does not exist" argument also applies to "truth", "God", and even "reality" all quite beyond a consensus description for at least three millennia. For each issue or problem defying description or understanding, simply escape the problem by claiming it doesn’t exist. Problem solved or problem avoided? Alternately, as Daniel Dennett explains consciousness as an account of the various calculations occurring in the brain at close to the same time. However, he goes on to say that consciousness is so insignificant, especially compared to our exalted notions of it, that it might as well not exist [1] . Oh, well. Getting back to consciousness, most of us have view