Skip to main content

Thoughts XX - big money

 
Big money. Want to get rich?  Invent a biodegradable ink.  With such chemistry, errant youths could have all the tattoos they desire, and not suffer their whole lives with visible proof of temporary insanity.

Bigger money.  You see Facebook ,Twitter, Instagram, and the like as social apps.   It seems that modernity has an unlimited appetite for such apps.  These transcend the now ancient letter, morning coffee, and telephone conversation by miles, even light years.  Create a new such app.  Easy to say, difficult to do,but the rewards are extravagant. 

Really big money. We know the national debt (in 2015) is about 19 trillion dollars.  A lot of money this is.  But what does it mean?  We are crossing scales or orders of magnitude, and this is difficult for almost all people.  Suppose I said that a lifetime is about two billion seconds. (Actually, 2.2 billion seconds.) This is a magnitude of such a value to make it incomprehensible by any measure.  But when I say a life is about 70 years, this we understand well – too well for some of us.  Yet, in terms of dollars the national debt spans four orders of magnitude more. Spanning scales is not easy. The brain doesn't do well, but we try to bring such magnitudes within the scope of understanding.  Case-in-point?  Money and the national debt.  What can be purchased with the $19T?  Tough? Yes.  Let’s go easier and ask what can be purchased with just a measly $1T.   This has been the subject of many articles and examples.  Here are some others.
 With one trillion dollars, I could cover the costs of everything I have dreamed of for myself, my family and my friends and additionally
  • Funding the costs of educating all American K-12 students for one year.
  • A cash award of $3,400 for everyone in the USA.
  • The US government discretionary spending for one year.
  • Funding the interest on the US national debt for four years.
  • Funding US Social Security for about one year.
  • Purchasing  a new $100K home for about 10 million people, or a $250,000 home for every single person in the greater Houston area.
  • Purchasing about 2.5 million “fully equipped” Roll Royce’s  or about 22 million “loaded” Ford Expeditions.
  • Everything sold by Wal-Mart for two years.
Philosophy.  On a philosophical note, it is orders of magnitude that makes the heap paradox so very interesting. We have examined above the nature of understanding the national debt as a dollar-by-dollar event, but could not.  Here's another simple example:  We want to measure in seconds when a person becomes old. We agree that everyone at the age of 80 (or 2.5 billion seconds), is old. Others may consider 60 or 70 years as old. Now at the age of one second, you are not old, and so for two seconds, and three seconds, four seconds, and so on.  Continue this question second-by-second until "old age" is reached. You cannot give an consensus answer.  Partly, this is because the term "old" is vague.  That is, when you examine a vague term such as "old," and use precise mico-terms such as seconds to describe it, the brain breaks down.  It will not suffer such considerations.

In the same way, understanding the national debt, by the dollar, is virtually impossible.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

Where is AI (Artificial Intelligence) Going?

  How to view Artificial Intelligence (AI).  Imagine you go to the store to buy a TV, but all they have are 1950s models, black and white, circular screens, picture rolls, and picture imperfect, no remote. You’d say no thanks. Back in the day, they sold wildly. The TV was a must-have for everyone with $250 to spend* (about $3000 today). Compared to where AI is today, this is more or less where TVs were 70 years ago. In only a few decades AI will be advanced beyond comprehension, just like TVs today are from the 50s viewpoint. Just like we could not imagine where the video concept was going back then, we cannot really imagine where AI is going. Buckle up. But it will be spectacular.    *Back then minimum wage was $0.75/hr. Thus, a TV cost more than eight weeks' wages. ------------------------- 

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...