Skip to main content

Trump and Obama - twins having different mothers



Dangerous Quotes – the talking points of our world. Many if not most Americans are moved by quotes, in fact simple quotes.  Here are three that may resonate.

  • What’s good for General Motors is good for the country.
  • Power to the people.
  • In God’s name … (fill it in)


Today we consider a quote from Cervantes’ Don Quixote. “When life itself seems lunatic, who knows where madness lies? Perhaps to be too practical is madness. To surrender dreams — this may be madness. Too much sanity may be madness — and maddest of all: to see life as it is, and not as it should be!”
 
Persuasive? Yes.  Articulate? Yes. Simple? Yes. Accurate?  Well, maybe but…  It is completely open ended, without any indication of what “should be”  should be.  It leaves to the reader the full imagination of possible worlds that could be.  It is attractive to a spectrum of opinion.  The most ardent Nazi and most dedicated Communist can both rally around.
This is one problem today in the USA and even Europe.  Too many see an America as they envision it, irrespective of what it is, irrespective of what it might be, and irrespective of what is possible. The mantra is,
Nothing is impossible if  only you believe.
There can be no question that life for the many can be better, but for some group (such as the progressives) to put as an action item a world where life is better in their particular way is even a greater madness.  This is an invention and then distortion of truth.
Cervantes' quote amounts to a single talking point whereby one makes an interpretation without qualification, where a few make decisions to reform an entire world, and where they cleverly articulate their view to the many. 
This is the stuff of Utopian worlds so much adored by the naive yet so much damned by the experienced. Indeed, the committed activist has little time or capacity for philosophical subtleties.  He or she must act. The committed activist must transmit a simple message, one that resonates, proposing followers will have a better life if only they adhere. 
Even more remarkable is that activists for the new world order usually have little sophistication beyond their single talking point that the “world should be this or that.”
Allowing a little politics here, we note that Donald Trump and Barack Obama are entirely similar, with both promising hope and change, and both without specifics.  Trump and Obama are twins but from opposite poles, each offering a promise for what should be. We suspect similarity of methods. The other Republicans and Democrats simply do not recognize this present force.


Dangerous are the words of Cervantes.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Accepting Fake Information

Every day, we are all bombarded with information, especially on news channels.  One group claims it's false; another calls it the truth. How can we know when to accept it or alternatively how can we know it's false? There are several factors which influence acceptance of fake or false information. Here are the big four.  Some just don’t have the knowledge to discern fact/truth from fiction/fact/false*. Some fake information is cleverly disguised and simply appears to be correct. Some fake information is accepted because the person wants to believe it. Some fake information is accepted because there is no other information to the contrary. However, the acceptance of  information  of any kind become a kind of  truth , and this is a well studied topic. In the link below is an essay on “The Truth About Truth.” This shows simply that what is your point of view, different types of information are generally accepted, fake or not.   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/g-donald-allen-420b03

Your Brain Within Your Brain

  Your Bicameral Brain by Don Allen Have you ever gone to another room to get something, but when you got there you forgot what you were after? Have you ever experienced a flash of insight, but when you went to look it up online, you couldn’t even remember the keyword? You think you forgot it completely. How can it happen so fast? You worry your memory is failing. Are you merely absent-minded? You try to be amused. But maybe you didn’t forget.   Just maybe that flash of insight, clear and present for an instant, was never given in the verbal form, but another type of intelligence you possess, that you use, and that communicates only to you. We are trained to live in a verbal world, where words matter most. Aside from emotions, we are unable to conjure up other, nonverbal, forms of intelligence we primitively, pre-verbally, possess but don’t know how to use. Alas, we live in a world of words, stewing in the alphabet, sleeping under pages of paragraphs, almost ignoring one of

Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious?

  Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious? I truly like the study of consciousness, though it is safe to say no one really knows what it is. Some philosophers has avoided the problem by claiming consciousness simply doesn’t exist. It's the ultimate escape clause. However, the "therefore, it does not exist" argument also applies to "truth", "God", and even "reality" all quite beyond a consensus description for at least three millennia. For each issue or problem defying description or understanding, simply escape the problem by claiming it doesn’t exist. Problem solved or problem avoided? Alternately, as Daniel Dennett explains consciousness as an account of the various calculations occurring in the brain at close to the same time. However, he goes on to say that consciousness is so insignificant, especially compared to our exalted notions of it, that it might as well not exist [1] . Oh, well. Getting back to consciousness, most of us have view