Skip to main content

Talking Points Nation



The talking points nation. 
We are faced with a huge population whose knowledge base, whose opinions, and whose operational guidelines are contained within a few sheets of talking points. Information is exchanged via talking points, and knowledge is conceived through talking points.  Sure, there is the talking points exchange from time to time, wherein some points are replaced by others, but the total number is conserved.  It is akin to the Malthusian, wherein when the number of talking points exceeds capacity to absorb there results a diminution and constriction of the whole.  Definitely not gestalt. 

This may, under the most generous interpretation, be a consequence of modern information overload, dissembled national viewpoints, or highly crafted antipodal positions.  With less generosity it may be more simply disinterest, preoccupation, or depth of understanding, all as promoted by our schools.
Political demagoguery is paramount in their creation of talking points.  Their platforms are carefully crafted to absorb many on the basis of a single (talking) point. Most modern political campaigns are such collections, almost never with little more than plausibility explanations, almost always appealing to groups for whom the particular talking points dominate everything internal, in contrast to what used to be call the "big" picture.

Have you noticed there is no longer any mention of the big picture?

Here are a few issues.  Liberals and conservatives alike align their votes on these simple bases.


  •     Abortion: (a) Yes, A woman controls her body  (b) No. Sanctity of life is beyond other considerations.
  •     Climate Change (a) Yes, let's do something now before we perish. (b) Maybe, let's continue to study the causes and implications.
  •    Gun control: (a) Guns are a constitutional right and deterrent to crime. (b) Guns kill and continue to kill. Elimination of guns will lead to a harmonious nation.
  •    Immigration: (a) We should welcome all internationals. (b) We have immigration procedures to legally admit newcomers.  You buy the whole package.  Balancing has become difficult. Both camps agree if you accept one or the other, your vote is determined.
  •    Minimum wage increase: (a) This will cause a decrease in lower paid workers due to lay-offs. Small business will suffer. (b) These under paid people need more to live on.  It is only fair.
  •    International relations.  (a)  We are the only possible leaders of the free world. We must lead. (b) We must share power with all other nations. There can be no other way.

The thoughtful reader will certainly say these dichotomies are misleading.  Yet, they command American politics.

Other talking point issues concern Wall Street, the Flag, Military service, gay marriage, planned parenthood, the VA, the IRS, and many more.  Strong opinions for any of them results in a vote for the platform most closely aligned. For example, a strong stance about the VA can override any opinion on the others.  

Talking points promote and encourage intellectual polarization.

Just poll anyone on any of these issues.  Depending on their answer of strong yes or no, you will know most likely how they will vote.  Few will say, for example the independents, the issue is more complicated that just the talking point. Partisans carefully probe this group as to which talking points resonate. 

Even national leaders seldom stray from their talking points.

For the vague or highly complex topics, such as compromise, morality, or alternative solutions, there may be little consideration.  For example, morality is a lost subject applied by some to be sweeping rules to cover each topic without weight, to accept anything non-traditional, as if casting out centuries of custom can only result in enlightenment and a better humanity. The complexity of religion, not really amenable to talking points, is no longer active in consideration of the many preferring sweeping talking points delimiting its content and practice.  Here the century old (note the singular) science is often evoked as proof, usually without understanding, and almost always as a supporting talking point.
____________
He thinking was so far out of the box he got lost.  The goal is to make the box bigger.  Remember, the whole point of thinking outside the box is to find a new solution.  This means one must know what's actually in the box first.
______________
"Education is one of the most complex endeavors of mankind."

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please Comment.

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Lemming Instinct

  In certain vital domains, a pervasive mediocrity among practitioners can stifle genuine advancement. When the intellectual output of a field is predominantly average, it inevitably produces research of corresponding quality. Nevertheless, some of these ideas, by sheer chance or perhaps through effective dissemination, will inevitably gain traction. A significant number of scholars and researchers will gravitate towards these trends, contributing to and propagating further work along these established lines. Such a trajectory allows an initially flawed concept to ascend to the status of mainstream orthodoxy. However, over an extended period, these prevailing ideas invariably fail to withstand rigorous scrutiny; they are ultimately and conclusively disproven. The disheartening pattern then reveals itself: rather than genuine progress, an equally unvalidated or incorrect idea often supplants the discredited one, swiftly establishing its own dominance. This cycle perpetuates, ensurin...
Post a Comment
Read more