Skip to main content

Do College Presidents Make Too Much Money?



In a recent report of compensation of university presidents, it is reported that the average annual compensation (in all forms) is just over $428,000 in 2014, up 7% from a year earlier, according to an analysis of 238 chief executives at 220 public universities from the Chronicle of Higher Education, nearly four times what the average full professor makes.  See http://money.cnn.com/2015/06/07/pf/college/highest-paid-public-university-presidents/

That’s a lot of money.  But what is the true compensation?  They suffer universal contempt from the faculty* who think the job is mostly routine, something any (very careful) idiot can do.  They are also living at the whim of their boards that seem to reflect the general public opinion which is about the same as faculty.  Most of them have given up successful research careers, which is what brought them into the business in the first place.  They live in the money world, where all kinds of observation is made about great education, but where their principle task is money and getting more of it.  This is the criteria for their continued survival.

Why do they do it? For some, it is the perception of power, an attractive motivator for many.  For some it is the need to administrate or lead, seeming a primal goal of many humans. For some it is the compensation, pretty good in the minds of your average teacher.  However, overall most have little power, aside from making small changes to a highly rigid structure with inviolable entitlements.  Their pursuit of money for the campus leaves little time to actually lead.  This is deferred to lower level administrators, who often simply seek more money as well.  Travel and events?  Absolutely relentless requirements.

When their administrative tenure is ended, usually after only 5-10 years, most have nothing, and often no collegial respect.  Their research skills have attenuated after years of administrative pursuit.   What they have is still a very good salary in their home department that mostly hopes they will retire to free up a really generous faculty line to hire someone that actually can contribute intellectually. 

As I’ve learned about academic administration… First you learn how to do it, then you get used to it, and finally you get sick of it. :)

*Faculty do not suffer low self-esteem. Very few understand the subtleties of administration.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

Where is AI (Artificial Intelligence) Going?

  How to view Artificial Intelligence (AI).  Imagine you go to the store to buy a TV, but all they have are 1950s models, black and white, circular screens, picture rolls, and picture imperfect, no remote. You’d say no thanks. Back in the day, they sold wildly. The TV was a must-have for everyone with $250 to spend* (about $3000 today). Compared to where AI is today, this is more or less where TVs were 70 years ago. In only a few decades AI will be advanced beyond comprehension, just like TVs today are from the 50s viewpoint. Just like we could not imagine where the video concept was going back then, we cannot really imagine where AI is going. Buckle up. But it will be spectacular.    *Back then minimum wage was $0.75/hr. Thus, a TV cost more than eight weeks' wages. ------------------------- 

Fake News

If you've been following the news the last couple of days, you will note the flurry of copy devoted to fake news.  Both sides are blaming whatever has befallen them the consequence of fake news.  Let's look at this phenomenon a bit.    When I was a student years ago, a friend climbed some mountain in Peru.   A article was written in the local newspaper about the event.   In only three column inches, the newspaper made about six errors.   An easy article to write you say?   Just interview and reproduce.   Yet so many errors?   The question is this: was this fake news or bad reporting?   The idea here is that fake news comes in various flavors. Bad reporting – errors made by the author or editor Opinion presented as news     Deliberate creation of falsehoods to favor a point of view       The reporting of selected truths to favor a particular point of view Now we have the big social media ...