Skip to main content

Body Cameras



The Police.  There is a strong movement toward which all police officers must wear body cameras.  The claim is that not only will such cameras deter abuse and other conflagrations of the law, but will document the officer’s daily activities.  The camera will create a log of all activities of this officer, and this is becomes a part of the officer’s permanent file.   A few consequences on the pro side include

  • Documentation of abusive actions of the officer. 
  • Clarification of charges made by the officer or by the perpetrator.
  • A strict adherence by the officer to written procedures.

These sound like a welcome relief to the critics.  And for about 1% of all police officers, it means that the tendency to abuse must be curtailed.  This sounds good.  However, there is a con side to this.

1.       As mentioned above, the officer’s permanent file containing all encounters will reveal all mistakes made, and there will be these. 
2.       The camera will make the officer a bit shy about exercising any wisdom involving a situation, and cause a strict adherence to procedures.  Indeed, the officer may be reluctant to release a suspect perceived for intuitive reasons there is no serious offence and there should be taken no action.  It is conjectured these are more numerous than unjustified arrests.
3.       The rise of the PPM (Policy and Procedures Manual) will enlarge to many thousands of pages as police seek to document every possible policing situation.  With this document vaulting to such a magnitude there will certainly be inconsistencies, if not contradictions outright.  Note the US tax code.  Lawyers will be able to authoritatively argue both sides of a case each based on the written word.  
4. Paradoxically, the number of arrests may increase.

The PPM has come into its own with the diminishment of wisdom and the willingness to exercise it.  It has already come to dominate the schools and colleges.  When there is no clear rule about a situation, the same situation will escape action, no matter how much it cries for one.  The next edition of the PPM will get bigger, as second rate administers attempt to codify it.  

The teacher.  Worse still, the beleaguered teacher, having endured accusations of hundreds of possible misappropriations of justice, abuse, and ill-will may soon also become the target of the body cam.  This will also change how teachers respond even to the most trivial classroom event.  The teacher will be unwilling to exact true wisdom in unique circumstances, and will resign herself to procedures as written.  Even slight infractions must be referred; even innocent comments of reprimand may not be allowed.   Good or bad, the teacher will have a new permanent record that may endure for decades.   

Next??  What groups then must follow?  Doctors, civil servants, psychologists,  administrators of all stripes?  Sounds ridiculous?  To me yes, but stay tuned.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

Where is AI (Artificial Intelligence) Going?

  How to view Artificial Intelligence (AI).  Imagine you go to the store to buy a TV, but all they have are 1950s models, black and white, circular screens, picture rolls, and picture imperfect, no remote. You’d say no thanks. Back in the day, they sold wildly. The TV was a must-have for everyone with $250 to spend* (about $3000 today). Compared to where AI is today, this is more or less where TVs were 70 years ago. In only a few decades AI will be advanced beyond comprehension, just like TVs today are from the 50s viewpoint. Just like we could not imagine where the video concept was going back then, we cannot really imagine where AI is going. Buckle up. But it will be spectacular.    *Back then minimum wage was $0.75/hr. Thus, a TV cost more than eight weeks' wages. ------------------------- 

Fake News

If you've been following the news the last couple of days, you will note the flurry of copy devoted to fake news.  Both sides are blaming whatever has befallen them the consequence of fake news.  Let's look at this phenomenon a bit.    When I was a student years ago, a friend climbed some mountain in Peru.   A article was written in the local newspaper about the event.   In only three column inches, the newspaper made about six errors.   An easy article to write you say?   Just interview and reproduce.   Yet so many errors?   The question is this: was this fake news or bad reporting?   The idea here is that fake news comes in various flavors. Bad reporting – errors made by the author or editor Opinion presented as news     Deliberate creation of falsehoods to favor a point of view       The reporting of selected truths to favor a particular point of view Now we have the big social media ...