Skip to main content

Body Cameras



The Police.  There is a strong movement toward which all police officers must wear body cameras.  The claim is that not only will such cameras deter abuse and other conflagrations of the law, but will document the officer’s daily activities.  The camera will create a log of all activities of this officer, and this is becomes a part of the officer’s permanent file.   A few consequences on the pro side include

  • Documentation of abusive actions of the officer. 
  • Clarification of charges made by the officer or by the perpetrator.
  • A strict adherence by the officer to written procedures.

These sound like a welcome relief to the critics.  And for about 1% of all police officers, it means that the tendency to abuse must be curtailed.  This sounds good.  However, there is a con side to this.

1.       As mentioned above, the officer’s permanent file containing all encounters will reveal all mistakes made, and there will be these. 
2.       The camera will make the officer a bit shy about exercising any wisdom involving a situation, and cause a strict adherence to procedures.  Indeed, the officer may be reluctant to release a suspect perceived for intuitive reasons there is no serious offence and there should be taken no action.  It is conjectured these are more numerous than unjustified arrests.
3.       The rise of the PPM (Policy and Procedures Manual) will enlarge to many thousands of pages as police seek to document every possible policing situation.  With this document vaulting to such a magnitude there will certainly be inconsistencies, if not contradictions outright.  Note the US tax code.  Lawyers will be able to authoritatively argue both sides of a case each based on the written word.  
4. Paradoxically, the number of arrests may increase.

The PPM has come into its own with the diminishment of wisdom and the willingness to exercise it.  It has already come to dominate the schools and colleges.  When there is no clear rule about a situation, the same situation will escape action, no matter how much it cries for one.  The next edition of the PPM will get bigger, as second rate administers attempt to codify it.  

The teacher.  Worse still, the beleaguered teacher, having endured accusations of hundreds of possible misappropriations of justice, abuse, and ill-will may soon also become the target of the body cam.  This will also change how teachers respond even to the most trivial classroom event.  The teacher will be unwilling to exact true wisdom in unique circumstances, and will resign herself to procedures as written.  Even slight infractions must be referred; even innocent comments of reprimand may not be allowed.   Good or bad, the teacher will have a new permanent record that may endure for decades.   

Next??  What groups then must follow?  Doctors, civil servants, psychologists,  administrators of all stripes?  Sounds ridiculous?  To me yes, but stay tuned.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Accepting Fake Information

Every day, we are all bombarded with information, especially on news channels.  One group claims it's false; another calls it the truth. How can we know when to accept it or alternatively how can we know it's false? There are several factors which influence acceptance of fake or false information. Here are the big four.  Some just don’t have the knowledge to discern fact/truth from fiction/fact/false*. Some fake information is cleverly disguised and simply appears to be correct. Some fake information is accepted because the person wants to believe it. Some fake information is accepted because there is no other information to the contrary. However, the acceptance of  information  of any kind become a kind of  truth , and this is a well studied topic. In the link below is an essay on “The Truth About Truth.” This shows simply that what is your point of view, different types of information are generally accepted, fake or not.   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/g-donald-allen-420b03

Your Brain Within Your Brain

  Your Bicameral Brain by Don Allen Have you ever gone to another room to get something, but when you got there you forgot what you were after? Have you ever experienced a flash of insight, but when you went to look it up online, you couldn’t even remember the keyword? You think you forgot it completely. How can it happen so fast? You worry your memory is failing. Are you merely absent-minded? You try to be amused. But maybe you didn’t forget.   Just maybe that flash of insight, clear and present for an instant, was never given in the verbal form, but another type of intelligence you possess, that you use, and that communicates only to you. We are trained to live in a verbal world, where words matter most. Aside from emotions, we are unable to conjure up other, nonverbal, forms of intelligence we primitively, pre-verbally, possess but don’t know how to use. Alas, we live in a world of words, stewing in the alphabet, sleeping under pages of paragraphs, almost ignoring one of

Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious?

  Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious? I truly like the study of consciousness, though it is safe to say no one really knows what it is. Some philosophers has avoided the problem by claiming consciousness simply doesn’t exist. It's the ultimate escape clause. However, the "therefore, it does not exist" argument also applies to "truth", "God", and even "reality" all quite beyond a consensus description for at least three millennia. For each issue or problem defying description or understanding, simply escape the problem by claiming it doesn’t exist. Problem solved or problem avoided? Alternately, as Daniel Dennett explains consciousness as an account of the various calculations occurring in the brain at close to the same time. However, he goes on to say that consciousness is so insignificant, especially compared to our exalted notions of it, that it might as well not exist [1] . Oh, well. Getting back to consciousness, most of us have view