Skip to main content

Discontinuity of understanding

It may be widely believe that knowledge progresses gradually, in small steps, in gentle increments, or in slight gradations.  It may be not so, even for us as individuals.  New knowledge or understanding often begins with insights. 



When you gain an insight, and it is true, it becomes applicable and remains so from then on.   This changes one’s problem solving game. This insight provides a new tool or rule, but importantly  it creates a discontinuity in your problem solving methods.   So, we might ask whether insights can come gradually?  In some cases, probably yes, though examples are difficult to furnish.  The emergence of infinity, often credited to Cantor, took centuries of dancing around the edges by philosophers.  The germ theory of disease so often attributed to Pasteur was anticipated almost with the invention of the microscope.  On the other hand plate tectonics seemed to arise by a simple insight by a single person, Alfred Wegener, in 1912 and took a mere half century to achieve acceptance.   In many cases the insight may incubate in a collective or individual  for some time before emerging in full bloom. 

A few questions.  Must an insight be associated with a particular problem?  Probably.  Can one simply arise out of the blue and then find its application somewhere? Probably not.  Are we always receiving insights and then forgetting them just as quickly? Absolutely yes.  Are some insights wrong?  Yes, and in great numbers.

Knowledge and understanding, it seems, progress not as a continuous evolution, but in discrete steps.  Moreover, it is the solution of a problem that drives insights.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

Where is AI (Artificial Intelligence) Going?

  How to view Artificial Intelligence (AI).  Imagine you go to the store to buy a TV, but all they have are 1950s models, black and white, circular screens, picture rolls, and picture imperfect, no remote. You’d say no thanks. Back in the day, they sold wildly. The TV was a must-have for everyone with $250 to spend* (about $3000 today). Compared to where AI is today, this is more or less where TVs were 70 years ago. In only a few decades AI will be advanced beyond comprehension, just like TVs today are from the 50s viewpoint. Just like we could not imagine where the video concept was going back then, we cannot really imagine where AI is going. Buckle up. But it will be spectacular.    *Back then minimum wage was $0.75/hr. Thus, a TV cost more than eight weeks' wages. ------------------------- 

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...