Skip to main content

The Common Core and Flying Carpet Soutions

In a recent article Alice Walton comments on the new Common Core State Standards. She establishes that the Common Core has many flaws, particularly that many students develop at differing rates, and a common curriculum demanding a lock-step approach to education is wrong, and wrong from the get-go.http://www.forbes.com/sites/alicegwalton/2014/10/23/the-science-of-the-common-core-experts-weigh-in-on-its-developmental-appropriateness/

My response to this article follows. 

The article is accurate in almost every respect. Let me generalize. One of four flying carpet solutions to the educational mess our nation finds itself are regularly offered. These are grandiose plans advertizing that in a single and simplistic stroke can bring a failing system to the forefront of excellence in education - worldwide. (a) Change the curriculum. (b) Put education on a sound business model. (c) Reduce class sizes. (d) Make education fun. Currently, American education system is suffering the first of these. Despite the number of headliner educator and politician proponents, it will dissemble in time, just as it has multiple times previously. All four solutions involve top-down systemic changes, the only kind "big education" can comprehend and propose.

Always missing from the equation are the kids themselves - and their parents. Unless kids understand the importance of learning, and parents demand excellence rather than abrogate their responsibilities, big solutions cannot and will not work.

What about the other "big" solutions? (b) has been attempted, e.g. Bainbridge schools with limited success, and (c) has be studied extensively with non conclusive findings - at least in California. Indeed, the conclusion was that small class sizes have little effect on actual learning. And (d)? Learning is not always fun. It is work, at least it has been for me. The fun part comes after learning and it is applied to interesting problems.

On high stakes testing. With or without big solutions, high stakes testing will continue. Opting out is not an honest or true option. If the system cannot be measured, it has little value in a world dominated by measured outcomes. Upon a close examination of these tests, it becomes apparent that problems are of limited types, and they cycle every few years.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please Comment.

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Lemming Instinct

  In certain vital domains, a pervasive mediocrity among practitioners can stifle genuine advancement. When the intellectual output of a field is predominantly average, it inevitably produces research of corresponding quality. Nevertheless, some of these ideas, by sheer chance or perhaps through effective dissemination, will inevitably gain traction. A significant number of scholars and researchers will gravitate towards these trends, contributing to and propagating further work along these established lines. Such a trajectory allows an initially flawed concept to ascend to the status of mainstream orthodoxy. However, over an extended period, these prevailing ideas invariably fail to withstand rigorous scrutiny; they are ultimately and conclusively disproven. The disheartening pattern then reveals itself: rather than genuine progress, an equally unvalidated or incorrect idea often supplants the discredited one, swiftly establishing its own dominance. This cycle perpetuates, ensurin...
Post a Comment
Read more

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...
Post a Comment
Read more