A Chink in the Common Core Armor

For the last several years, we’ve seen a parade of prominent educators, businessmen, and politicians extolling the virtues of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS). Big money has been spent, and in the educational enterprise, big means really big. The US Department of Education conditioned some state funding on the basis of states accepting and implementing the new standards.

Partly because of the probably correct perception our public education system was failing, the CCSS were adopted with virtually no testing by at least forty states. It was hoped, actually expected, that most states would now be rowing with common ores and the result would be a stronger national educational system. But these standards are intellectually demanding as to what is taught and importantly to how they are to be taught. Many of our students and teachers were not up to the challenge. The teachers were given insufficient training, and the students were left in the wake of this giant oil tanker navigating through uncharted and troubled waters. Only as the testing has begun have the early-on efficacy questions been raised – in mass.

This should not be surprising. Even a small change in curriculum can disturb the delicate process of learning and the demands placed upon a vast corps of teachers. Some states have opted out of the CCSS, e.g. Indiana, Oklahoma, and most states are making modifications to them and particularly the testing. (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/02/50-states-common-core_n_5751864.html)

An even a more surprising consequence, and certainly unintended, is the rise of a national test “opting out” movement because the Common Core is now a national platform. Indeed, there are “how to” website giving detailed instructions about the process. (http://saynotocommoncore.com/)

While some states wish very much to maintain the standards, some states have decided they need to be modified. For example, the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) has recently given educators in New York and Connecticut funding to revise the CCSS. Said AFT President Randi Weingarten, “These grants are about giving educators some seed money to take their ideas about educational standards and convert them into practice. Many educators support higher standards but are concerned about particular aspects, especially the Common Core standards' poor implementation and their developmental appropriateness, particularly in the early grades.” Wide latitude is given critiquing the Common Core standards or writing new ones, as judged needed or necessary.

We may expect other states, not simply opting out altogether, to also make modification according to perceived needs. The net result may be a dissembling of a proposed national curriculum to a multiverse of state curricula – just what was in place only a few years ago. It is hoped the overall level of standards will comprise an upgrade to curricula previously in place.

Is this good? The upgrade, if that is the net result, for sure. But the transition will be troublesome for all too many teachers. The students? As usual, the students must learn from whatever dish is served.

Lies, Deceit, and the National Agenda

The world you grew up in is no more. The world of reasonable honesty and reasonable lies has been replaced by abject dishonesty and blatant lies. Lies. Yes. People have always told them. You have told them; so have I. We need lies; they are a foundational structure of social living. They both deceive and protect. Children tell them to their parents to avoid consequences, like punishment. Adults tell them to their bosses, to enhance their position and/or avoid consequences of poor performance. Our bosses tell them to their boards to suggest business is good, the project is on target, or the detractors are wrong. The boards tell them to shareholders to protect their own credibility and most importantly, stock values. Our politicians tell lies to their constituents, though sometimes innocently with them not actually knowing much more than they've been told. They enhance their positio...

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I. I. Introduction. Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II. ...

UNCERTAINTY IS CERTAIN

Uncertainty is Certain G. Donald Allen 12/12/2024 1. Introduction . This short essay is about uncertainty in people from both secular and nonsecular viewpoints. One point that will emerge is that randomly based uncertainty can be a driver for religious structure. Many groups facing uncertainty about their future are deeply religious or rely on faith as a source of comfort, resilience, and guidance. The intersection of uncertainty and religiosity often stems from the human need to find meaning, hope, and stability in the face of unpredictable or challenging circumstances. We first take up the connections of uncertainty to religion for the first real profession, farming, noting that hunting has many similar uncertainties. Below are groups that commonly lean on religious beliefs amidst uncertainty. This short essay is a follow-up to a previous piece on certainty (https://used-ideas.blogspot.com/2024/12/certainty-is-also-emotion.html). U...

First Blog

Search This Blog