Skip to main content

High Stakes Testing - 2014

National Standardized Tests. For those interested in the current state of K-12 education in the United States.

The 2014 round of standardized exam administration got underway in several states this week. As predicted by FairTest and our Testing Resistance & Reform Spring (TRRS) allies, opt-out campaigns and other forms of protest exploded in many communities. See http://www.resistthetest.org

The CCSS, Common Core of States Standard, is more-or-less a set of national standards aimed at improving K-12 education.  In mathematics, its goal is to increase thought provoking curricula with an emphasis on problem solving in all grades.  Of coruse, this sounds great.  It sounds as though at least someone has found the true path.  And 47 state agreed.  Currently, only Indiana has opted out. Of course, in the interest of accountability, there are the associated high stakes tests to measure compliance and achievement of the so-called "Core."  An unsurprising controversy has emerged. But why should it with the ultimate goal achieved.

These tests seem to be not an untended consequence of the CCSS but rather an unexpected consequence.  For years we've been hearing about resentment of state standards with their concomitant high stakes testing - for an assortment of reasons.  As long it was confined to states the resentment enjoyed no national platform, and had particularly no extended organizational mechanism.  With the CCSS, we see a pointed example of a  human self-organizing system with sufficient numbers obtained.

This is not a disclaimer of the CCSS, but rather what can happen when a program, regardless of its merits, goes national.  There becomes a resistance to a further intrusion by the new and now unified multitude against something long viewed as undesirable.  In analogy to the so called orphan diseases, those with small numbers infected, high stakes testing has now emerged from relative, local obscurity to reach the front page of educational issues.

For adherents of the CCSS, there is seems remedy in sight. For opponents, the same.
High stakes testing may need serious revision and then rebirth down the road.  But high stakes testing there will be.

This situation is not uncommon these days.  Those in favor of a failing program say we haven't done enough.  Pull out the stops, do more, spend more.  Those against can only say it "doesn't work." This presents us with yet another impossible problem, or a problem with little hope for a solution.

For information in favor of the common core see http://www.shankerinstitute.org/curriculum/

For a rebuttal of this see http://disted6.math.tamu.edu/newsletter/newsletters_new/Closing_the_Door-manifesto-text.pdf
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please Comment.

Popular posts from this blog

UNCERTAINTY IS CERTAIN

  Uncertainty is Certain G. Donald Allen 12/12/2024 1.       Introduction . This short essay is about uncertainty in people from both secular and nonsecular viewpoints. One point that will emerge is that randomly based uncertainty can be a driver for religious structure. Many groups facing uncertainty about their future are deeply religious or rely on faith as a source of comfort, resilience, and guidance. The intersection of uncertainty and religiosity often stems from the human need to find meaning, hope, and stability in the face of unpredictable or challenging circumstances. We first take up the connections of uncertainty to religion for the first real profession, farming, noting that hunting has many similar uncertainties. Below are groups that commonly lean on religious beliefs amidst uncertainty.   This short essay is a follow-up to a previous piece on certainty (https://used-ideas.blogspot.com/2024/12/certainty-is-also-emotion.html). U...
Post a Comment
Read more

Problem Solving? Then Find Those Gaps

  Problem Solving - Finding Gaps 12/28/2024 Introduction. Solving complex problems often arises from the presence of gaps in knowledge, resources, understanding, or perspectives. These gaps introduce uncertainty, ambiguity, or constraints, making solutions difficult to achieve. Below, we explore the primary types of gaps that complicate problem-solving and their implications. Many are of the technical, informational, theoretical, and social nature. You may discover some of these gaps are also sources of uncertainty in problem-solving, in that they supply us with another list of things that can go wrong based on something missing. Gaps also form a type of impossible problem, that will be discussed in a later chapter. Finally, this essay is about all problems and solutions, not just those of science. Contents Comprehension Gaps Consistency Gaps Solution-Type Gaps Invisible Gaps   Knowledge and Evidence Gaps   Methodological and Technological Gaps Ethical and Cult...
Post a Comment
Read more

CERTAINTY IS ALSO AN EMOTION

  Certainty is also a Feeling Certainty is often viewed as a mental state tied to knowledge and confidence, but it also functions as a feeling with distinct emotional and physiological components. While it arises from cognitive processes, certainty also has a subjective and emotional quality that makes it more than just a rational judgment. It provides a sense of assurance and security that shapes human experience in profound ways. Emotional Dimension . At its core, certainty evokes emotions that influence how we perceive and interact with the world. When someone feels certain, they often experience relief, comfort, or empowerment. These emotions are particularly strong when uncertainty or doubt is resolved, offering a sense of closure. For example, solving a complex problem or having a belief validated by evidence brings not just intellectual satisfaction but also emotional reassurance. Subjectivity. Certainty is inherently personal and subjective. It depends on individual...
Post a Comment
Read more