Skip to main content

Big Data and the NSA

As most everyone knows, the NSA is compiling meta-data on us all.  This means that phone numbers each of us dials, the origin of the call, and the length of the call are compiled.  Who knows what is compiled about email and  text messages?  Who knows what is happening with social media information, though most anyone can get at this.  The effort is to catch the bad guys before they have a chance to be bad.  There are several arguments of why or why not this is moral, ethical, necessary, or even works.  But it happens now and will continue indefinitely. 

Companies are even more invasive.  When my daughter thought her job was at risk, she began circulating inquiries about other employment.  Her then current employer, apparently reading her email, cautioned her about this.  She stopped making such communications. Just about one year later she was suddenly and abruptly terminated.  Is there a connection? 

Circle  of Friends. Here we have all this data, just sitting on some massive drives somewhere in Utah.  What to do with it?  Here's an idea.  This meta-data source should be made available to sociologist specializing in big-data analysis.  What could be determined are circles of friends, circles of acquaintances, associate acquaintances, orbits of influence.  From the mere meta-data vast information about how a society functions in a social-communication manner is just idly sitting there. Hierarchical relationships can be uncovered. The importance of communication within social strata can be compiled.  And more.  This would open a new and vast field of study of societies.  It could be used to compare civilizations, countries, cities, companies, and many other sub-fields of society.  It could become a detector of the health of a nation.  All of this could be of very great importance. 

So we ask the NSA to open their data banks to reputable researchers.   Sure, make safeguards. Even encrypt the numbers - easy.  There is no need to reveal anything more than the meta-data without identifiers,  and then only for counting, the creation of spreadsheets, and the representation of orbits of association.  It would be a shame to let this massive compiling left only to detect the "needle in the haystack" - rare this is.  It could be used for some genuine good.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Comparing phone calls and letters - the new vs. the old.   Suppose the USPS (postal service) were set to the task of recording the sender of every letter you receive by the sender?  Outrage, yes.  But suppose they were also opening the letter - not looking at it though they could - and recording the length of the message.  Double outrage! Unthinkable!  But for phone calls, maybe its ok?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...

The Lemming Instinct

  In certain vital domains, a pervasive mediocrity among practitioners can stifle genuine advancement. When the intellectual output of a field is predominantly average, it inevitably produces research of corresponding quality. Nevertheless, some of these ideas, by sheer chance or perhaps through effective dissemination, will inevitably gain traction. A significant number of scholars and researchers will gravitate towards these trends, contributing to and propagating further work along these established lines. Such a trajectory allows an initially flawed concept to ascend to the status of mainstream orthodoxy. However, over an extended period, these prevailing ideas invariably fail to withstand rigorous scrutiny; they are ultimately and conclusively disproven. The disheartening pattern then reveals itself: rather than genuine progress, an equally unvalidated or incorrect idea often supplants the discredited one, swiftly establishing its own dominance. This cycle perpetuates, ensurin...