Skip to main content

The Case of the Repeated Noun

When the same noun is used on both sides of the verb it has a remarkable effect. It confers a meaning that may entrance, or even inspire the reader. Linking the same stem in this manner confers a deeper meaning and affect an emotional response.  If implies a deeper meaning, which actually upon reflection is incumbent on the reader to create.  It is really just a linguistic trick used by all the our masters* of language.  But they must be applied with the author mindful of just the right application.

Here is a famous quote: "Luck is believing you're lucky." --- Tennessee Williams
Here is another:
Dryden to Lawrence (of Arabia) in the film: "It is recognized you have a funny sense of fun." 

The remaining of these were generated from noun and verb lists.  Though all were constructed in just two hours, it should take you just two minutes to review.  All bunk.
  • Hope is in the imagination of the hopeful.
  • Freedom is life's realization to be free.
  • Memory is in itself a memory.
  • Success breeds success.
  • Depression suffers its own depression.
  • Depression is the mother's milk of the depressed.
  • The optimist survives sometimes only on optimism.
  • Letters from home are the letters of a past life.
  • A tendency in this direction often implies a tendency in that.
  • Thinking thoughts of hope amount to thinking thoughts of joy.
  • We always need more information about the information.
  • A moment is merely a moment, momentarily considered only at the moment.
  • War is a war upon humanity.
  • The proof resides mostly believing in the proof.
  • Proving is believing in the proof.
  • A war is but an episode in the eternal human war.
  • A war is but a single battle in the eternal human war.
  • Timing your actions is also timing your results.
  • Shelter the enslaved is to enslave the sheltered.
  • To throw a switch may be to switch the game.
  • Shaving your odds too close may shave reality from your options.
Your assignment.  Make up a couple of these.  Note how amazing the use of a repeated noun has upon the effect to amaze.
*BTW, I am not one of these masters but just noticed one of the masters' tricks.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

Principles of Insufficiency and Sufficiency

   The principles we use but don't know it.  1.      Introduction . Every field, scientific or otherwise, rests on foundational principles—think buoyancy, behavior, or democracy. Here, we explore a unique subset: principles modified by "insufficiency" and "sufficiency." While you may never have heard of them, you use them often. These terms frame principles that blend theory, practicality, and aspiration, by offering distinct perspectives. Insufficiency often implies inaction unless justified, while sufficiency suggests something exists or must be done. We’ll examine key examples and introduce a new principle with potential significance. As a principle of principles of these is that something or some action is not done enough while others may be done too much. The first six (§2-6) of our principles are in the literature, and you can easily search them online. The others are relatively new, but fit the concepts in the real world. At times, these pri...

The Lemming Instinct

  In certain vital domains, a pervasive mediocrity among practitioners can stifle genuine advancement. When the intellectual output of a field is predominantly average, it inevitably produces research of corresponding quality. Nevertheless, some of these ideas, by sheer chance or perhaps through effective dissemination, will inevitably gain traction. A significant number of scholars and researchers will gravitate towards these trends, contributing to and propagating further work along these established lines. Such a trajectory allows an initially flawed concept to ascend to the status of mainstream orthodoxy. However, over an extended period, these prevailing ideas invariably fail to withstand rigorous scrutiny; they are ultimately and conclusively disproven. The disheartening pattern then reveals itself: rather than genuine progress, an equally unvalidated or incorrect idea often supplants the discredited one, swiftly establishing its own dominance. This cycle perpetuates, ensurin...