Skip to main content

Google's Secret Is Out

The secret is out!  Google and other email service providers track, store, and analyze your email.  They claim that the service is free, and they have every right to monitor and analyze your emails.  Yes?  When you do searches  or even read your email, you see on your screen promotions that not surprisingly address your personal concerns.   It goes even further, in that they maintain permanent records of your email.  This implies corporate secrets, family secrets, and even government secrets are available to third parties, and particularly those to whom they market such information.  It has even been discovered that IRS officials have been using these services for official work. 

Previously we reported on a number of high-level scandals involving the emails  of some officials and their various peccadilloes.  But now the range of activities seems to extend to e v e r y single person.

Example.  If I was the president of Corporation A and I wanted to know what the president of Corporation B is doing, and if a email address is known, this information can be purchased. 

Multiply this over  hundreds or thousands of special interests with a concern about their opponents.  Can foreign governments access the "ZitMail" records of persons or companies with whom they are involved?   The information is sitting on a server somewhere.  The scope of the  full implications are so  momentous it challenges the mind to grasp it.

For those of you familiar with regular postal mail, imagine if you will, that the US Postal Service regularly opened all your mail, copied it, and then analyzed and stored it in perpetuity. This includes letters from your banker, your mom, your business partners, and everybody else.   You would be incensed, not to mention shocked, not to mention outraged.  Yet, the outrage against these email services, while shocking to us all, seems to be hitting a soft landing.  We say, "Oh well, that's our new normal."

All of that said, your should encrypt your email if you really don't want it read.  Period!  You cannot escape through the anonymity of the massive scale of the totality of messages.  There are programs and servers capable of the analysis of this data that range far beyond the scope of your imagination.  For example, Google has a publically availabe Ngram code that has analyzed millions of books for work frequency counts.  See http://books.google.com/ngrams/.  

A rule of thumb is that if you don't want your message read, don't send it.  A former solution was to make the communiques by phone, but now this is even suspect.  In generations past, much serious communications was conducted only face-to-face in a secure location.  Those folks knew the risks of written information - translated now to e- and voice mail.  

The caveat to the rule of thumb above is encryption.  In a previous blog, I outlined how to do this - easily and for free.  See.
http://used-ideas-quickies.blogspot.com/2013/01/encryption-for-those-in-need.html
The code is written for relatively small emails of a few hundred words, but we can make it available to those needing greater capacity. 

Cloud computing.  All the rage these days is cloud computing, wherein you store your data in the "cloud" accessing from any computer anywhere you may be.  It is safe, it is secure.  Maybe.   But you can be assured everything you have in the "cloud" and you don't even know where that cloud is or who owns it, has been mined or is available for mining.  Cloud computing may protect your data from your neighbor, but your data is known nonetheless.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Accepting Fake Information

Every day, we are all bombarded with information, especially on news channels.  One group claims it's false; another calls it the truth. How can we know when to accept it or alternatively how can we know it's false? There are several factors which influence acceptance of fake or false information. Here are the big four.  Some just don’t have the knowledge to discern fact/truth from fiction/fact/false*. Some fake information is cleverly disguised and simply appears to be correct. Some fake information is accepted because the person wants to believe it. Some fake information is accepted because there is no other information to the contrary. However, the acceptance of  information  of any kind become a kind of  truth , and this is a well studied topic. In the link below is an essay on “The Truth About Truth.” This shows simply that what is your point of view, different types of information are generally accepted, fake or not.   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/g-donald-allen-420b03

Your Brain Within Your Brain

  Your Bicameral Brain by Don Allen Have you ever gone to another room to get something, but when you got there you forgot what you were after? Have you ever experienced a flash of insight, but when you went to look it up online, you couldn’t even remember the keyword? You think you forgot it completely. How can it happen so fast? You worry your memory is failing. Are you merely absent-minded? You try to be amused. But maybe you didn’t forget.   Just maybe that flash of insight, clear and present for an instant, was never given in the verbal form, but another type of intelligence you possess, that you use, and that communicates only to you. We are trained to live in a verbal world, where words matter most. Aside from emotions, we are unable to conjure up other, nonverbal, forms of intelligence we primitively, pre-verbally, possess but don’t know how to use. Alas, we live in a world of words, stewing in the alphabet, sleeping under pages of paragraphs, almost ignoring one of

Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious?

  Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious? I truly like the study of consciousness, though it is safe to say no one really knows what it is. Some philosophers has avoided the problem by claiming consciousness simply doesn’t exist. It's the ultimate escape clause. However, the "therefore, it does not exist" argument also applies to "truth", "God", and even "reality" all quite beyond a consensus description for at least three millennia. For each issue or problem defying description or understanding, simply escape the problem by claiming it doesn’t exist. Problem solved or problem avoided? Alternately, as Daniel Dennett explains consciousness as an account of the various calculations occurring in the brain at close to the same time. However, he goes on to say that consciousness is so insignificant, especially compared to our exalted notions of it, that it might as well not exist [1] . Oh, well. Getting back to consciousness, most of us have view