Skip to main content

Hate



Just like sin, hate is easy to sell.   Hate is intense dislike.  Hate is with us always.  In many ways hate is the opposite of “love.”

Forms of hate include but are not limited to racism, class warfare, ethnicity, religion, power, spousal, parental, climate, politics, beliefs, and anything contrary to one of the senses, e.g. smell, music.  Probably there are more.   What are your preferences?  Politicians of hate, often called demagogues, are everywhere at every time, in every place. For some, it is a career.

Hate is used frequently in our language.  In the database from the “Word Frequencies in Written and Spoken English”  based on the 100,000,000 word electronic databank sampled from both spoken and written English  British National Corpus  at http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/bncfreq/flists.html  we obtain the work frequency analysis for nouns, verbs, adjectives, and other parts of speech.   We exclude articles of speech, pronouns, prepositions, and the like. 

Interesting points to consider, and you must be a true word geek to want to go further. :)

  1. Nouns. There are about 3030 nouns that measure usage at the rate of at least ten per million.  The top two nouns are “time,” and “year.” They sum up to a frequency about 2%.  The top twenty nouns are time, year, people, way, man, day, thing, child, Mr, government, work, life, woman, system, case, part, group, number, world,  and house. This constitutes about 9% of all nouns used.  The bottom twenty are rehearsal, reluctance, residue, ribbon, scrap, semi-final, shilling, soviet, spelling, spider, stadium, toast, t-shirt, vegetation, velocity, voltage, waiter, waiting, wartime, and wheat.  They constitute about 0.11% of usage.  Remarkably, many of the bottom twenty begin with letters in the bottom register of the alphabet. 
  2.  Nouns. Though “hate” is a verb, not a noun, few of the accepted hate-type or negative-type nouns, of which there are about 45, make few entries with these words.  Hate-type nouns include abhorrence,  abomination,  anathema,  animosity,  animus,  antagonism,  antipathy,  aversion,  black beast,  bother,  bugbear,  bête noire,  detestation,  disgust,  enmity,  execration,  frost,  grievance,  gripe,  hatred,  horror,  hostility,  ill will,  irritant,  loathing,  malevolence,  malignity,  mislike,  nasty look,  no love lost,  nuisance,  objection,  odium,  pain,  rancor,  rankling,  repugnance,  repulsion,  resentment,  revenge,  revulsion,  scorn,  spite,  and trouble.  Actually, only four of these are on the original list of nouns.  This implies they occur rarely.  I, for example, have never used “bugbear.”    I have used most of the others.  One of my early teachers once said I was repugnant to authority.  Despite the truth, is the negative, hateful,  or what?
  3. Verbs. There are about 1113 verbs on this list.  The top twenty include be, have, do, will, say, would, can, get, make, go, see, know, take, could, think, come, give, look, may, and should.  A basic set, if I ever heard one.  As verbs, they occur about 55% of the time.  The bottom twenty include harm, indulge, inject, invade, invoke, level, nominate, obscure, offset, pledge, prohibit, roar, rob, rock, root, smooth, straighten, strive, swell, and venture. Collectively the bottom set occurs about 0.13% of the time.  “Hate” is number 405.  This means that of all the verbs used in this list the rate that “hate” occurs is #405, which translates to 50 uses  of every 100,000,000 words used. 
  4.  Adjectives. There are 1035 adjectives on the list.  The top twenty-one include, in order of occurrence, other, good, new, old, great, high, small, different, large, local, social, important, long, young, national, British, right, early, possible, big, and little.  As adjectives, they occur about 20% of the time.  The bottom twenty include, in order of occurrence, puzzled, worldwide, handicapped, organizational, sunny, eldest, eventual, spontaneous, vivid, rude, nineteenth-century, faithful, ministerial, innovative, controlled, conceptual, unwilling, civic, meaningful, and disturbing.  These occur about 0.36% of the time.
As well, there are variations on the words, hate words, and hate language.  We could go on with adverbs and the like, but it is apparent that “hate” is a player in the game of words, an important though not a major one.  It is not without some significance, that the use of the words “hate” and “love has changed dramatically in the last two centuries.  More on this later.

Conclusion.  While hate and hate speech words are not exactly high on the list of word frequency counts, it is definitely there.  Is it wrong?  The un-blushed advocate would say any and all of these words are wrong but yet use them freely upon their opponents or detractors.   The simple fact is that hate and love are components of our personalities.  While we enjoy defeating and deprecating hate, we need it ourselves, if only to categorize thing we prefer or detest.  (See, another hate word.) Can we reduce “hate” to mere “dislike?”  Probably not.   We are a species of opposites, sometimes benignly in views but more often in activities.  If we love, then we may hate.  If we hate, then we may love.  Anyone who avoids the one at the expense of the other is considered a saint on the one hand or evil incarnate on the other.  

 To my mind love and hate form a balance in our lives.  Is it possible to know one without knowing the other?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

Where is AI (Artificial Intelligence) Going?

  How to view Artificial Intelligence (AI).  Imagine you go to the store to buy a TV, but all they have are 1950s models, black and white, circular screens, picture rolls, and picture imperfect, no remote. You’d say no thanks. Back in the day, they sold wildly. The TV was a must-have for everyone with $250 to spend* (about $3000 today). Compared to where AI is today, this is more or less where TVs were 70 years ago. In only a few decades AI will be advanced beyond comprehension, just like TVs today are from the 50s viewpoint. Just like we could not imagine where the video concept was going back then, we cannot really imagine where AI is going. Buckle up. But it will be spectacular.    *Back then minimum wage was $0.75/hr. Thus, a TV cost more than eight weeks' wages. ------------------------- 

Fake News

If you've been following the news the last couple of days, you will note the flurry of copy devoted to fake news.  Both sides are blaming whatever has befallen them the consequence of fake news.  Let's look at this phenomenon a bit.    When I was a student years ago, a friend climbed some mountain in Peru.   A article was written in the local newspaper about the event.   In only three column inches, the newspaper made about six errors.   An easy article to write you say?   Just interview and reproduce.   Yet so many errors?   The question is this: was this fake news or bad reporting?   The idea here is that fake news comes in various flavors. Bad reporting – errors made by the author or editor Opinion presented as news     Deliberate creation of falsehoods to favor a point of view       The reporting of selected truths to favor a particular point of view Now we have the big social media ...