Skip to main content

Inside the Box

Boxes. Things I've learned about people and their boxes.  The box metaphor for thought is well described and most appropriate.  Most people do live in some kind of box, though few will admit it.

  • a. Some people cannot think outside the box; moreover they can't think inside the box either.
  • b. Before one can think out of the box, he/she must first learn to think inside it. 
  • c. Some people think only inside the box. Indeed, they live in their box with the lid tightly closed.
  • A thought-box is a shield from unwanted ideas and thoughts. It protects and maintains a personal security. For many, it is a needed construct for day-to-day living. It provides the type of life assurance only babies have.
  • Some people construct a big, a huge box for thinking. It resembles a cathedral, with a foundation and floor, with walls, with buttresses, topped off with a cupola, and protected by a wide moat. This makes their thought free from assault by new ideas or even old ideas. Usually, there are no windows. Once constructed, they become prisoners within it - for life.
  • Many people limit their thinking to the box best described as a catechism. It covers all needed arguments and counter arguments. It is one of the most secure boxes. It is safe, almost free from siege. They are safe within their mainstream of consciousness and free from outside alternatives.
  • Many people that live in the box deny or reject there are other boxes. Intercommunication between two boxes is impossible.
  • Box thinkers are often smug believing they have discovered the ultimate box, i.e. the truth.
  • Box thinkers don't take intellectual risks. Box thinkers fear risks.
  • There are liberal and conservative box-thinkers. They don't talk much to each other.
  • However much you think you think outside the box, all your thoughts are contained in the bigger box, the capacities or sandbox of your brain.
  • You are not thinking outside the box if all you achieve is a small variation or addition to something well within the box. 
  • "New" does not imply "outside the box"  thinking.  It doesn't imply good.  It doesn't imply worthwhile.  Just "new" has little merit in itself. 
On the plus side of all this, thinking inside the box is thinking within a stable environment. It creates a predictable world where eventualities can be calculated and considered. Thinking outside the box creates a “newness” of unknown implications and unknown possibilities.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Accepting Fake Information

Every day, we are all bombarded with information, especially on news channels.  One group claims it's false; another calls it the truth. How can we know when to accept it or alternatively how can we know it's false? There are several factors which influence acceptance of fake or false information. Here are the big four.  Some just don’t have the knowledge to discern fact/truth from fiction/fact/false*. Some fake information is cleverly disguised and simply appears to be correct. Some fake information is accepted because the person wants to believe it. Some fake information is accepted because there is no other information to the contrary. However, the acceptance of  information  of any kind become a kind of  truth , and this is a well studied topic. In the link below is an essay on “The Truth About Truth.” This shows simply that what is your point of view, different types of information are generally accepted, fake or not.   https://www.linkedin.com/posts/g-donald-allen-420b03

Your Brain Within Your Brain

  Your Bicameral Brain by Don Allen Have you ever gone to another room to get something, but when you got there you forgot what you were after? Have you ever experienced a flash of insight, but when you went to look it up online, you couldn’t even remember the keyword? You think you forgot it completely. How can it happen so fast? You worry your memory is failing. Are you merely absent-minded? You try to be amused. But maybe you didn’t forget.   Just maybe that flash of insight, clear and present for an instant, was never given in the verbal form, but another type of intelligence you possess, that you use, and that communicates only to you. We are trained to live in a verbal world, where words matter most. Aside from emotions, we are unable to conjure up other, nonverbal, forms of intelligence we primitively, pre-verbally, possess but don’t know how to use. Alas, we live in a world of words, stewing in the alphabet, sleeping under pages of paragraphs, almost ignoring one of

Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious?

  Is Artificial Intelligence Conscious? I truly like the study of consciousness, though it is safe to say no one really knows what it is. Some philosophers has avoided the problem by claiming consciousness simply doesn’t exist. It's the ultimate escape clause. However, the "therefore, it does not exist" argument also applies to "truth", "God", and even "reality" all quite beyond a consensus description for at least three millennia. For each issue or problem defying description or understanding, simply escape the problem by claiming it doesn’t exist. Problem solved or problem avoided? Alternately, as Daniel Dennett explains consciousness as an account of the various calculations occurring in the brain at close to the same time. However, he goes on to say that consciousness is so insignificant, especially compared to our exalted notions of it, that it might as well not exist [1] . Oh, well. Getting back to consciousness, most of us have view