Skip to main content

Inside the Box

Boxes. Things I've learned about people and their boxes.  The box metaphor for thought is well described and most appropriate.  Most people do live in some kind of box, though few will admit it.

  • a. Some people cannot think outside the box; moreover they can't think inside the box either.
  • b. Before one can think out of the box, he/she must first learn to think inside it. 
  • c. Some people think only inside the box. Indeed, they live in their box with the lid tightly closed.
  • A thought-box is a shield from unwanted ideas and thoughts. It protects and maintains a personal security. For many, it is a needed construct for day-to-day living. It provides the type of life assurance only babies have.
  • Some people construct a big, a huge box for thinking. It resembles a cathedral, with a foundation and floor, with walls, with buttresses, topped off with a cupola, and protected by a wide moat. This makes their thought free from assault by new ideas or even old ideas. Usually, there are no windows. Once constructed, they become prisoners within it - for life.
  • Many people limit their thinking to the box best described as a catechism. It covers all needed arguments and counter arguments. It is one of the most secure boxes. It is safe, almost free from siege. They are safe within their mainstream of consciousness and free from outside alternatives.
  • Many people that live in the box deny or reject there are other boxes. Intercommunication between two boxes is impossible.
  • Box thinkers are often smug believing they have discovered the ultimate box, i.e. the truth.
  • Box thinkers don't take intellectual risks. Box thinkers fear risks.
  • There are liberal and conservative box-thinkers. They don't talk much to each other.
  • However much you think you think outside the box, all your thoughts are contained in the bigger box, the capacities or sandbox of your brain.
  • You are not thinking outside the box if all you achieve is a small variation or addition to something well within the box. 
  • "New" does not imply "outside the box"  thinking.  It doesn't imply good.  It doesn't imply worthwhile.  Just "new" has little merit in itself. 
On the plus side of all this, thinking inside the box is thinking within a stable environment. It creates a predictable world where eventualities can be calculated and considered. Thinking outside the box creates a “newness” of unknown implications and unknown possibilities.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lies, Deceit, and the National Agenda

The world you grew up in is no more.  The world of reasonable honesty and reasonable lies has been replaced by abject dishonesty and blatant lies. Lies.  Yes. People have always told them.  You have told them; so have I.   We need lies; they are a foundational structure of social living.  They both deceive and protect.  Children tell them to their parents to avoid consequences, like punishment.  Adults tell them to their bosses, to enhance their position and/or avoid consequences of poor performance.  Our bosses tell them to their boards to suggest business is good, the project is on target, or the detractors are wrong.  The boards tell them to shareholders to protect their own credibility and most importantly, stock values.   Our politicians tell lies to their constituents, though sometimes innocently with them not actually knowing much more than they've been told.  They enhance their positio...

Behavioral Science and Problem-Solving

I.                                       I.                 Introduction.                Concerning our general behavior, it’s high about time we all had some understanding of how we operate on ourselves, and it is just as important how we are operated on by others. This is the wheelhouse of behavioral sciences. It is a vast subject. It touches our lives constantly. It’s influence is pervasive and can be so subtle we never notice it. Behavioral sciences profoundly affect our ability and success at problem-solving, from the elementary level to highly complex wicked problems. This is discussed in Section IV. We begin with the basics of behavioral sciences, Section II, and then through the lens of multiple categories and examples, Section III. II.     ...

Fake News

If you've been following the news the last couple of days, you will note the flurry of copy devoted to fake news.  Both sides are blaming whatever has befallen them the consequence of fake news.  Let's look at this phenomenon a bit.    When I was a student years ago, a friend climbed some mountain in Peru.   A article was written in the local newspaper about the event.   In only three column inches, the newspaper made about six errors.   An easy article to write you say?   Just interview and reproduce.   Yet so many errors?   The question is this: was this fake news or bad reporting?   The idea here is that fake news comes in various flavors. Bad reporting – errors made by the author or editor Opinion presented as news     Deliberate creation of falsehoods to favor a point of view       The reporting of selected truths to favor a particular point of view Now we have the big social media ...